Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davieG

What Leicester City’s finances mean for Nigel Pearson’s future

Recommended Posts

And people say we should have kept Sven?

Another season of his regime would have sent us bust...no doubt about it.

People have questioned why NP has not bought players in on loan etc....now we see why.

This summer we need to continue to rebuild, get rid of the high earners, beckford, danns, wellens, gallagher, konch, maybe even the likes of Kasper and Nuge aswell. Then we can look at the 3 clubs which have gone down for any replacements.

e.g.

Peterborough - Tomlin, Boyd , Gayle, Rowe, Zakuani.....

Bristol City - Adomah, Davies, Cunningham

All of the above would add something to the club, most are young, and relatively cheap aswell.

Getting rid of Pearson would only add to our costs, reducing any investment in players we can make...we really have been left in a sticky situation due to last season, but we have to get on with it.

Are you me in disguise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent, insightful article.

Regarding investment in players - why do so many people still seem to be fooled by the notion that big investment in transfer fees / wages equals success? So many teams have blown absolute fortunes to absolutely no avail. Conversely, look at some of the better teams in our division - Cardiff, Palace, Watford - none of them have spent particularly big.

.

Erm..what?

They paid almost £3 for Maynard. £2m for Kim. The same amount for Jordan Mutch and Craig Noone. £1.5 for Turner and Gunarsson. Plus extortionate wages for Craig Bellamy. How is this not spending big?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...