Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Sir Steve Howard

Member
  • Posts

    906
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sir Steve Howard

  1. 12 hours ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

    Me and my pals had a top weekend in Eindhoven. We stopped at Ghent on the way and Genk coming back.

     

    FC Eindhoven 3-2 Almere City 

    Last minute screamer won it, felt like non league level despite it being 2nd tier and Almere being in the top division last season. 

    Fell in love with the place tbf, just everything you want from a match day and so pure. I haven't celebrated a Leicester goal like I did their winner and I'd only been there 2 hours.

     

    Genk 0-3 Standard Liege 

    I think Genk looked leggy after winning in Zagreb in the week and never got going. Both sets of support amazing. Genk halted the game with pyro and fireworks at the start of the second half and Liege didn't stop all game.

     

    I love visiting Belgium and Netherlands, just so easy to get to, yet so different for all the right reasons.

     

    Looking forward to planning another.

    what, ever?!?

  2. 1 hour ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

    Peterborough (A) 1-5 in 2018.

     

    Great day out and we took a very good end. 

     

    I'm pretty much against modern football and love grounds with character, but that away end has been a massive upgrade on the terrace. 

    Couldn't disagree more

    • Like 2
  3. 20 hours ago, Lionator said:

    People just get completely caught in their context and moment. It’s why we should probably teach more emotion regulation stuff in schools.

     

    I gave up playing local cricket as week after week my team and opponents were verbally abusing each other, threatening violence and generally just being arses. Nobody needs it, it’s supposed to be the release away from the grind.

    This is exactly why I love playing sunday league football. Bandit country.

  4. 7 hours ago, Lionator said:

    Neither of those should be even in the event. One pretending she’s Kazakh and the other from the other war crime country. It’s a disgrace. 

    Not sure if this is satire, shall we ban all Yanks while we're at it?

  5. 33 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

    They need to stop allowing so many teams from one country joining and reduce the number of teams qualifying.

     

    It shouldn't be anyone's right to qualify.

     

    If it was up to me I would let only the winners of the leagues and cups qualify.

     

    Make clubs like Arsenal, Spurs, Newcastle, Villa, Atleti, Sevilla, Dortmund, Leverkusen, Roma, Lyon, Monaco etc earn their spots in the Champions League by actually winning things.

     

    I hate that Newcastle lost 12 league games last season yet qualified for the Champions League in 5th place.

    I know it's out of character but Spurs won the Europa last year. Newcastle won the league cup.

    I understand the sentiment of only allowing clubs who've won stuff in, but this contradicts your above point on poor sides being allowed in.

    If we returned to European cup entry requirements, you'd have Real Madrid beating HB Torshavn by a cricket score over two legs

  6. 1 hour ago, AKCJ said:

    All teams playing at the same time is fun but I still don't prefer this method to the old group stage.

     

    We have lost 5 teams who play in one of the top 5 leagues out of 36 clubs. We were a goalkeeper scoring a 97th minute goal away from that only being 4 teams.

     

    The UCL is needlessly bloated with some really poor sides. 

    there are 4 more teams at this stage than there were previously, two of which being newcastle & villarreal. admittedly the latter have been dire but wouldn't say the prev method was noticeably better in terms of quality.

    what you're seemingly suggesting is more in line with Super League proposal. 18 of the same 'elite' teams would become so stale in my eyes. No more Bodo/////Glimt

     

  7. 1 hour ago, BKLFox said:

    Going into the next rounds is this format an improvement on the previous and does it make for more jeopardy?

    I’m thinking not really as now Arsenal (just using them as an example but goes for 2nd, 3rd etc placed) coming 1st means they can’t play anyone lower than 15th & when they get through that then no one lower than 7th (or something like that)

    Wouldn't it just be better to open it up to free balls & luck of the draw with yes maybe given home advantage for finishing this 1st phase in top 8 or what ever but after that round it’s back to luck of draw.

    It’s still geared around ensuring the supposed big teams are still around in the 1/4s

    this is a poor take

×
×
  • Create New...