Yes N'Didi

I also agree with Sunderland camp that the time added on both halves was an absolute disgrace. 1 min added on for the first half when there should have been 3, then plays over the 1 to see out a promising Sunderland attack. 5 mins in the second half when there should have been 9. If we were losing we would be in uproar.

As someone said, Iheanacho shouldn't have sarcastically applauded, but when he's missed six clear arm round the waist and shirt pulling when the long ball has come over the top, the first time it's the other way round and he blows the whistle, you can understand the frustration. It's all about consistency. I can excuse decisions I don't like as long as they are applied consistently across both teams. Some referees have a style, which is to let the game flow, or to call up every foul. It was like last night he couldn't decide at any one point what he wanted to do and the result was he lost all control and authority.

I'm not one for throwing unnecessary jibes on here, but I imagine the lack of transparency regarding their role/who they represent doesn't help. They have been asked multiple times by multiple posters how many paid members are part of the Foxes Trust, for months, and not one reply. If people can't trust them to be open about who they represent, why would anyone trust anything else?