Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Dahnsouff

Forum Supporter
  • Posts

    25,802
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Dahnsouff

  1. People need to look at data like this https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/wilfred-ndidi/leistungsdaten/spieler/274839 Just as an example, the squad cannot cover for Wilf being out and in fact it’s laughable we have the best squad in the league. Best first XI sure, best squad, no. Our depth is mid table. Our wingers, if Steph or Abdul out of form, who do we bring on? Who do Leeds bring on? Gnonto or James, that is obviously preferable. Our midfield is light in options. Our defence is poor (apparently) Goalkeeper, sure, Mads is top tier. Only my opinion though.
  2. Agree that Enzo has proven nothing yet, beyond reenergising a derailed and shocked club after relegation, but that would likely have been possible with many managers once he who shall not be named exited. I never put much stock by anything the press say, so generally tend to assume a nefarious or alternate motive.
  3. We can sell, just cannot register beyond loan, free agents and also includes those here already on loan I thought.
  4. We surely are not blaming Enzo because a pet journo is blowing smoke up his arse are we?
  5. If that is our intent then fair play, all for sticking it to corrupt establishment as a basis for a challenge, but as misdirection to hide our poor financial management, then not so much. The deal with the deadlines for accounts, their differences is clear and we won that initial battle, so also fair enough.
  6. Is this a Suffolk judge?
  7. Not sure how that is relevant tbh, stupid rules or not, we signed up to them.
  8. There are two issues, one the rules are bent and two, we and others, broke them, they are not related.
  9. It’s hard not to think we did break the rules though as it seems a slam dunk, but yes innocent until proven guilty.
  10. Suspect we have an embargo in lieu of having a business plan. Bit petty, but I could imagine this being the reason.
  11. I could easily see an 8 points penalty
  12. Seems there is enough sh*t to go around in this case. Worst pass the parcel ever.
  13. Premier League is already saying to the EFL ‘Hold my mother feckin beer’.
  14. But Top is the boss, so of course it’s his fault.
  15. Not certain it’s true, that is just how I read it. It would hamstring us as selling to meet the requirements would mean selling at discount prices. We can sign free agents and get loans I think someone said, so it’s not the end of the world.(just as we know it)
  16. Think it is more a case of we are guilty, but they have overlooked the fact the accountancy period is not over and we could still sell before it closes to solve the issue?
  17. This would require an unexpected and as yet unseen solidarity between EPL and EFL to rapidly apply a new ruling they both agreed to conform too this season, and would almost certainly suggest an agenda.
  18. No, you are right, a fire sale and we are clear I assume, it just does not seem like we would a good job of one.
  19. It’s the letter rather than the spirit that’s the issue I feel, despite how utterly hypocritical that is of both EPL and EFL.
  20. Not at all. If we go up then the EPL screw us, if we stay down the EPL does.
  21. This I know, we are attempting to ‘slip through the cracks’ of the lack of cohesion between EFL and the PL. but this is a short term solution, as wherever we end up, they come at us harder.
  22. I am uncomfortable with how we are acting here tbh, it seems feckin clear we broke the rules, but to come on all billy big bollocks is pretty weird. The rules might be a joke, but it’s their rules for their competition and we signed up for it.
  23. Embargo is null and void with promotion, stop panicking.
×
×
  • Create New...