Scow Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 Please go away, you offer this football club nothing.
Ash Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 He came on today , won nothing in the air , missed a clear cut one on one ......Blake has got to improve or get out !
Benji Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 he wont read this scowy, he'll be too busy at the minute spending his HARD EARNT wages in a nightclub somewhere
Mad Dog Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 It's sad that the best thing he could do for us is to break his leg so he can't play for us again.
Guest freund Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 He's so slow, can't control it, can't head it, can't pass it, doesn't chase it. Useless.
Scow Posted 14 September 2004 Author Posted 14 September 2004 I heard Preston were interested when Fuller left for Pompey, I know Brown has gone, but please make a bid! :!:
Guest Daniel Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 Biggest load of shit since Ade, and i think Ade put more effort in than this piece of *beep*!
Guest freund Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 I heard Stoke are top of the league now!?!?!
dhermon Posted 15 September 2004 Posted 15 September 2004 he gets 2 minutes off the bench if hes lucky then no game in the 2's when will he get match fit i wonder pointless having at the club if he is going to do f$ck all he must have no pride taking money for nothing each week
Joe_Fox Posted 15 September 2004 Posted 15 September 2004 If you replaced "Nathan Blake" with "James Scowcroft" you would have the vast majority of last years posts on your hands. Stop whingeing about ol' Nath. I suppose Scowcroft is your favourite player now? Fickle fools.
Scow Posted 15 September 2004 Author Posted 15 September 2004 Nathan Blake is awful, simple as. Difference is with Scowcroft is that he played the majority of the season out of position, but I still defended him.
andy_croydz Posted 15 September 2004 Posted 15 September 2004 blake is awful so far, benjamin is better than him, hes same build as blake but hes faster better finisher and hes much younger, plus we have wright anyway and o grady and i bet o gradys better than blake
Scow Posted 15 September 2004 Author Posted 15 September 2004 blake is awful so far, benjamin is better than him, hes same build as blake but hes faster better finisher and hes much younger, plus we have wright anyway and o grady and i bet o gradys better than blake 19149[/snapback] I would even go as far as saying Matt Elliott is better upfront that Nathan Blake.
Cobbo Posted 15 September 2004 Posted 15 September 2004 I don't know why we brought him on in that situation surely if we're going to stick one upfront for the final stages of a game you want someone with energy who will chase everyball with a bit of pace. Why was it not Trev or Wright that came on? grrr!
Joe_Fox Posted 15 September 2004 Posted 15 September 2004 I don't know why we brought him on in that situation surely if we're going to stick one upfront for the final stages of a game you want someone with energy who will chase everyball with a bit of pace. Why was it not Trev or Wright that came on? grrr! 19153[/snapback] I think Blake is a confidence player, give him a chance. He is wearing a city shirt so support him.
Guest Daniel Posted 15 September 2004 Posted 15 September 2004 give him a chance. He is wearing a city shirt so support him. Excatly what we used to get told about Ade, not the case, dont cheer him on, sigh when he comes on and Adams will get the hint.
Cobbo Posted 15 September 2004 Posted 15 September 2004 I don't know why we brought him on in that situation surely if we're going to stick one upfront for the final stages of a game you want someone with energy who will chase everyball with a bit of pace. Why was it not Trev or Wright that came on? grrr! 19153[/snapback] I think Blake is a confidence player, give him a chance. He is wearing a city shirt so support him. 19166[/snapback] That wasn't actually a knock at Blake (although he looks lazy and uninterested from what I have seen of him) it was a knock at the decision to bring him on as I don't think he was the best player to put on in that situation.
Stuliasz Posted 15 September 2004 Posted 15 September 2004 I don't know why we brought him on in that situation surely if we're going to stick one upfront for the final stages of a game you want someone with energy who will chase everyball with a bit of pace. Why was it not Trev or Wright that came on? grrr! 19153[/snapback] I can understand why he was brought on, because he is supposed to be able to hold up the ball. I have it on good authority from a Wolves season ticket holder that he is actually good at this, but I have yet to see any evidence of it whatsoever.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.