Guest Daniel Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 I said even gays because of a joke between some members here, about being gay. Why butt in and try and make the worst out of my post? Id make all your posts look wrong and shit id i could be bother Haris, actually.... there all shit anyway.
HarisFox Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 At least I have a decent grasp of how to use punctuation, homophobe! Also, I wasn't trying to make the worst of your post.. Believe it or not, your post WAS offensive. *sigh*
Guest Daniel Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 Whats wrong with my puncuation there then? One letter wrong? wrong and shit id i could be Im sorry i pressed d instead of f. They are next to each other, easy mistake.
BartonFox Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 I said even gays because of a joke between some members here, about being gay.Why butt in and try and make the worst out of my post? Id make all your posts look wrong and shit id i could be bother Haris, actually.... there all shit anyway. 38787[/snapback] Jesus wept, and you were trying to pick fault with my English??????? Once again BM you have demonstarted your inability to construct a sensible adult debate. You always have to turn it into a playground spat and use foul and abusive language.
Guest Daniel Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 I said even gays because of a joke between some members here, about being gay.Why butt in and try and make the worst out of my post? Id make all your posts look wrong and shit id i could be bother Haris, actually.... there all shit anyway. 38787[/snapback] Jesus wept, and you were trying to pick fault with my English??????? Once again BM you have demonstarted your inability to construct a sensible adult debate. You always have to turn it into a playground spat and use foul and abusive language. 38796[/snapback] Im sorry but im sure ive made alot more positive comments on here than you'll ever make. You've made 52 posts at present and non of them have been constructive torwards anyone or anything.
HarisFox Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 I don't know whether to laugh or cry! Is BM actually for real?
BartonFox Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 Coming from someone with that tag line :w00t: It's so easy
Guest Daniel Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 I don't know whether to laugh or cry!Is BM actually for real? 38799[/snapback] For real man, innit. Id cry mate.
HarisFox Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 If you're the future of this country, I think I will. ps try I'd not Id.
Guest Daniel Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 Thanks for the advice. Coming on the forum thinking your all good, no wonder people dislike the OS, it aint just because of the layout, its because of prize arseholes like yourself.
HarisFox Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 I think I can live without your approval, homophobe.
Guest Daniel Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 Pathetic how your making a big deal over this when im not even a homophobe. You must be a homosexual. Nobody else has taken it with offense.
BartonFox Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 Sigmund Freud would have a field day with this one, his constant references to his Id Id The Id contains our primitive drives and operates largely according to the pleasure principle, whereby its two main goals are the seeking of pleasure and the avoidance of pain. It has no real perception of reality and seeks to satisfy its needs through what Freud called the primary processes that dominate the existence of infants, including hunger and self-protection. Who knew all those years ago he'd stumbled across BM.
HarisFox Posted 22 November 2004 Posted 22 November 2004 And what if I was a homosexual? Why do you use it in a negative way? If you don't like being called a homophobe then don't be homophobic. It's not really difficult. Also, I imagine some people are offended by it but know you well enough not to argue. You are so sure of yourself and you're making yourself look stupid... But then who am I to argue, I mean you're a great guy, hell, you EVEN try to get on with homosexuals!
Wilson Posted 22 November 2004 Author Posted 22 November 2004 No BM was just trying to say that he has a wide variety of friends - possibly just worded it wrong
HarisFox Posted 23 November 2004 Posted 23 November 2004 It's more what's in his subconscious that I'm worried about. He clearly sees homosexuals as 'not normal'... he EVEN gets on with them... Anyway, I'm not going to argue with him cos he had a tantrum about it on another thread. Besides which, apparently I MUST be a homosexual, which kinda compromises my argument because I must be biased. ps My girlfriend of over 4 years is standing behind me laughing at BlueMistress and I haven't even said anything to her. In her words you are a 'pathetic schoolboy with more internet presence than trousers'. I'm inclined to agree.
HarisFox Posted 23 November 2004 Posted 23 November 2004 It's more what's in his subconscious that I'm worried about. He clearly sees homosexuals as 'not normal'... he EVEN gets on with them... Anyway, I'm not going to argue with him cos he had a tantrum about it on another thread. Besides which, apparently I MUST be a homosexual, which kinda compromises my argument because I must be biased. ps My girlfriend of over 4 years is standing behind me laughing at BlueMistress and I haven't even said anything to her. In her words you are a 'pathetic schoolboy with more internet presence than trousers'. I'm inclined to agree.
Wilson Posted 23 November 2004 Author Posted 23 November 2004 Do you do psychology? All this talk of Subconscious & Freud makes me think you do. Anyways no need to have a go at BM it wasn't as if he said he hated gays or anything like that.
Guest Posted 23 November 2004 Posted 23 November 2004 Do you do psychology? All this talk of Subconscious & Freud makes me think you do.Anyways no need to have a go at BM it wasn't as if he said he hated gays or anything like that. 38918[/snapback] It was the way in which he phrased the original comment, Wilson. I've been on these boards for a while, and thought it could be a dig at some of the lads on here, but I can see Harisfox's point of view too, as the wording implied something different to those not familiar with the banter.
Ric Flair Posted 23 November 2004 Posted 23 November 2004 Yet another thread takes a turn for the worst after someone picking fault's with the mighty BM. Leave the lad alone, he's not just ****in raped someone. His comment he made regarding homosexuals wasn't dis-tasteful and i'm sure he didn't mean to come across as branding them. The proof is there when he says he gets on well with them, now you say they aren't different but they are. What shouldn't happen is they shouldn't be treated any differently to hetrosexuals. I wouldn't class my self as homophobic, but I do struggle to accept all that campness that comes with alot of homosexuals. Now that's not being offensive that's only the same as people slagging off chav's by saying you can't understand why they all wear fake burberry and bling themselves up and many people including myself would say that chavs are different to the rest of society. That is just the same as saying homosexuals are different to straight people, so why is one acceptable and one isn't? But again there are certain issues in the world such as racism and sexism where it's a sensitive subject and people can't make any comments without being persecuted yet people find it ok to make comments about germans, obese people, drug addicts, etc. Where's the continuity in things like that? BM's comment wasn't out of order at all if you look at it, it just depends whether your rational or irrational.
Guest Daniel Posted 23 November 2004 Posted 23 November 2004 Yet another thread takes a turn for the worst after someone picking fault's with the mighty BM. Leave the lad alone, he's not just ****in raped someone. His comment he made regarding homosexuals wasn't dis-tasteful and i'm sure he didn't mean to come across as branding them.The proof is there when he says he gets on well with them, now you say they aren't different but they are. What shouldn't happen is they shouldn't be treated any differently to hetrosexuals. I wouldn't class my self as homophobic, but I do struggle to accept all that campness that comes with alot of homosexuals. Now that's not being offensive that's only the same as people slagging off chav's by saying you can't understand why they all wear fake burberry and bling themselves up. But again there are certain issues in the world such as racism and sexism where it's a sensitive subject and people can't make any comments without being persecuted yet people find it ok to make comments about germans, obese people, drug addicts, etc. Where's the continuity in things like that? BM's comment wasn't out of order at all if you look at it, it just depends whether your rational or irrational. 38972[/snapback] Thank you mate, nice to have an adult and maturer post join in the discussion and put some decent input into it. You've been here for a while now and you've seen people trying to get me going, this is just another example. Thanks alot pal.
Jonesy_rules Posted 23 November 2004 Posted 23 November 2004 personally it's people's opinions, unless BM is going out attacking people he doesn't get on with, or people that don't like Chav's are, i do't see the problem, people don't get on with everyone its a fact of life! Live and let Live!
Guest Daniel Posted 23 November 2004 Posted 23 November 2004 People come on here throwing abuse about on chavs, i say one thing that makes me sound homophobe and i get all this shit, ridiculous. Im off to work.
Ric Flair Posted 23 November 2004 Posted 23 November 2004 personally it's people's opinions, unless BM is going out attacking people he doesn't get on with, or people that don't like Chav's are, i do't see the problem, people don't get on with everyone its a fact of life!Live and let Live! 38978[/snapback] Well said.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.