Stuliasz Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Hi everyone, can the people who went to the Wigan game please leave their ratings here. The team was: Taylor Makin Tiatto Dabizas Keown Gillespie Stewart Nalis Gudjonsson Scowcroft Connolly Subs: Morris Gemmill Blake Lets get as many as possible before I announce the results on Monday evening.
Muz Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Taylor 7 Makin 5 Tiatto 6 Dabizas 5 Keown 7 Gillespie 6 Stewart 6 Nalis 7 Gudjonsson 8* Scowcroft 7 Connolly 7 Subs: Morris 6 Gemmill 5 Blake 6 (He ran WTF!!)
Anish Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Can't say I was overly impressed with the performance - attacking wise we were poor and I can't see Connolly ever scoring at this rate. Taylor - 6 Makin - 5.5 Keown - 6 Dabizas - 6 Stewart - 7.5* Gillespie 5.5 Nalis - 6 Gudjonsson - 6 Tiatto - 6 Scowy - 5.5 Connolly - 6 Subs: Gemmill - 5 Morris - 6.5 Blake - 6
Craig Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Taylor 7 Makin 2 Tiatto 7 Dabizas 7 Keown 7 Gillespie 6 Stewart 6 Nalis 7 Gudjonsson 8 Scowcroft 7 Connolly 4 Subs: Morris 7 Gemmill 2 Blake 7 :w00t:
Guest Daniel Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Taylor - 9* - Made some good saves on his first match and is to thank for a clean sheet. Makin - 5 Keown - 7 Dabizas - 7 Stewart - 6 Gillespie - 7 Nalis - 6 Gudjonsson - 7 Tiatto - 6 Scowy - 6 Connolly - 5 Subs: Gemmill - 6 Morris - 7 Blake - 7
Scow Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Taylor 8 - Solid, made a few good saves, kicking a bit iffy though. Makin 5 - Poor distribution at times, but generally solid. Keown 9* - Rock at the back. Dealt with Roberts/Ellington with ease. Dabizas 6 - Did Ok, but still gives away far too many free kicks with his 'chesting' the striker from behind. Stewart 7 - Defensively good, still needs to work on his crosses and attacking play. Gillespie 6 - Tried his best, got in a few crosses, but nothing outstanding. Nalis 6 - A bit inconsistent with his passing at times, sometimes tends to not look where he's passing to and gives it away so cheaply. Gudjonsson 6 - A bit like Nalis, but did put some good tackles in and scrapped well. Just lacks that quality on distributing the ball. Tiatto 7 - As committed as ever, linked up well with Stewart down the left, seems to be getting a better understanding with every game. Scowcroft 7 - Held up the ball extremely well and showed some nice touches. Good awareness with his passing, which bought other's in to play. Connolly 6 - Not much of an impact, drops of in to the midfield/wide left too often, and then leaves us short upfront. Subs: Morris 7 - Looked lively again, should have got a penalty when he spun one of their defenders and was blatantly taken out. Gemmill 6 - Average, but kept things ticking over in midfield. Blake 7 - Yes, I gave him a 7. He played well when he came on, Held it up well and spun the defenders a few times. Couldn't believe it when he turned away from two defenders, got free down the right, and crossed the ball well in to the box.
Nathan_Ellington_WAFC Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 i have to agree, keowns experience was vital to you men today, i thought duke and jr would of ran rings round him
Guest Daniel Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 i have to agree, keowns experience was vital to you men today, i thought duke and jr would of ran rings round him 37656[/snapback] You know what thought did, thought he'd shit his pants but only farted.
Guest Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Taylor - 6.5 Makin - 5.5 Tiatto - 6.5 Dabizas - 5 Keown - 8 Gillespie - 6.5 Stewart - 5 Nalis - 6 Gudjonsson - 7 Scowcroft - 6.5 Connolly - 6 Subs: Morris - 6 Gemmill - 6 Blake - 6
Scow Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Blake and Connolly against Plymouth then? 37706[/snapback] Scowcroft and Morris upfront, Connolly behind the front two.
Mark Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Blake and Connolly against Plymouth then? 37706[/snapback] Scowcroft and Morris upfront, Connolly behind the front two. 37730[/snapback] Connolly on the right wing, Morris and Blake then. Makin and Gillespie is suicidal.
Scow Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Blake and Connolly against Plymouth then? 37706[/snapback] Scowcroft and Morris upfront, Connolly behind the front two. 37730[/snapback] Connolly on the right wing, Morris and Blake then. Makin and Gillespie is suicidal. 37733[/snapback] Blake over Scowcroft, you mad man.
Mark Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Blake and Connolly against Plymouth then? 37706[/snapback] Scowcroft and Morris upfront, Connolly behind the front two. 37730[/snapback] Connolly on the right wing, Morris and Blake then. Makin and Gillespie is suicidal. 37733[/snapback] Blake over Scowcroft, you mad man. 37736[/snapback] Just desperate. We seriously need a change up front but have no options.
Guest Daniel Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Blake and Connolly against Plymouth then? 37706[/snapback] Scowcroft and Morris upfront, Connolly behind the front two. 37730[/snapback] Connolly on the right wing, Morris and Blake then. Makin and Gillespie is suicidal. 37733[/snapback] Blake over Scowcroft, you mad man. 37736[/snapback] Just desperate. We seriously need a change up front but have no options. 37753[/snapback] Blake for Connolly then. Scowys better than Connolly will ever be.
Mark Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Blake and Connolly against Plymouth then? 37706[/snapback] Scowcroft and Morris upfront, Connolly behind the front two. 37730[/snapback] Connolly on the right wing, Morris and Blake then. Makin and Gillespie is suicidal. 37733[/snapback] Blake over Scowcroft, you mad man. 37736[/snapback] Just desperate. We seriously need a change up front but have no options. 37753[/snapback] Blake for Connolly then. Scowys better than Connolly will ever be. 37756[/snapback] Blake and Scowcroft up front, well that'll be a sight :w00t:
Teeno Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Morris and Connolly I'd go for, Morris was excellent when he came on. Lee Lee Lee Lee Morris!!!
Mark Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Morris and Connolly I'd go for, Morris was excellent when he came on.Lee Lee Lee Lee Morris!!! 37833[/snapback] Good call that
Teeno Posted 20 November 2004 Posted 20 November 2004 Morris and Connolly I'd go for, Morris was excellent when he came on.Lee Lee Lee Lee Morris!!! 37833[/snapback] Good call that 37835[/snapback] I really do think Morris will be a great player for this club, he deserves a start and I think he is fit enough to. Doing this I would drop Scowy to the bench rather than the wing so we can keep our natural shape.
Anish Posted 21 November 2004 Posted 21 November 2004 Morris and Connolly up front for me too - although Connolly needs to be told to stay up front and not drift into midfield or out wide. He keeps losing his position far too often, no wonder he's not scored more than 2 goals if he's never in the box at the right time.
Wilson Posted 21 November 2004 Posted 21 November 2004 Sounds like Blake had a good game overall Was williams deemed unfit to be in the squad or was he just a un-used sub?
Sparky Posted 21 November 2004 Posted 21 November 2004 taylor 7 ( did what he had to) makin 5 (distrabution was poor) Dabizas 7 (better than usual , vital challenges) keown 9 (rock) stewart 8 (excellant defensivly) gillespie 7 (worked hard , not like him at all!) gudjohnsson 8 (seemed to be everywhere , endless energy) nalis 5 (gave ball away too often , looked knackered) tiatto 6 ( lots of energy but final ball lets him down) connolly 6 (usual performance, worked hard but didnt look dangerous) scowcroft 6 (another who failed to bother wigan) subs morris 7 blake 7 (slimline :w00t:) gemmill 6
Anish Posted 21 November 2004 Posted 21 November 2004 Sounds like Blake had a good game overall Was williams deemed unfit to be in the squad or was he just a un-used sub? 37971[/snapback] Must have been deemed unfit cos he wasn't on the bench.
kirkup21 Posted 21 November 2004 Posted 21 November 2004 Taylor 7 Makin 4 Tiatto 7 Dabizas 5 Keown 7 Gillespie 5 Stewart 6 Nalis 5 Gudjonsson 7 Scowcroft 7 Connolly 6 Subs: Morris 6 Gemmill 5 Blake 6
Ash Posted 21 November 2004 Posted 21 November 2004 Taylor -7 Makin - 6 Tiatto - 7 Dabizas - 6 Keown - 8 Gillespie - 6 Stewart - 7 Nalis - 6 Gudjonsson - 5 Scowcroft - 7 Connolly - 6 Subs: Morris - 7 Gemmill - 6 Blake - 7
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.