Master Fox Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Josh Low is an absolute waste of space. He is no way near good enough to play at Championship level. I want him gone with likes of Andy Johnson, Tiatto, Douglas, Sylla, Porter, Elvis, O’Grady, Hughes, and even McCarthy all them are effing useless players. I’ve seen some awful players over the years at Leicester but this crop are the biggest bunch no hopers with absolute no talent whatsoever, I actually feel embarrassed watching these players try and play football. Kelly out and take your bag of with you!
Thracian Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Josh Low is an absolute waste of space. He is no way near good enough to play at Championship level. I want him gone with likes of Andy Johnson, Tiatto, Douglas, Sylla, Porter, Elvis, O’Grady, Hughes, and even McCarthy all them are effing useless players. I’ve seen some awful players over the years at Leicester but this crop are the biggest bunch no hopers with absolute no talent whatsoever, I actually feel embarrassed watching these players try and play football. Kelly out and take your bag of with you! You'd have made a good guard on the railways. All change.....
Fez of Mahrez Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Low is a League One player at best, always has been, always will be. I've said the same all along. However, I thought he looked okay when he came on on Saturday and if we had anyone to attack crosses he would become more effective.
Master Fox Posted 25 September 2006 Author Posted 25 September 2006 Low is a League One player at best, always has been, always will be. I've said the same all along. However, I thought he looked okay when he came on on Saturday and if we had anyone to attack crosses he would become more effective. You have got to be Joking? He was an absolute donkey; he couldn't even make one decent cross! He can't defend, pass or head the ball. His ability as a football player is probably on par with Jr Lewis. It was harder to miss that header than it was to score against Colchester on Saturday
Fez of Mahrez Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 You have got to be Joking? He was an absolute donkey; he couldn't even make one decent cross! He can't defend, pass or head the ball. His ability as a football player is probably on par with Jr Lewis. It was harder to miss that header than it was to score against Colchester on Saturday Yeah that was a bad miss. He was still better than Kenton, Johnson, Wesolowski, Hughes, O'Grady and Fryatt.
Master Fox Posted 25 September 2006 Author Posted 25 September 2006 Yeah that was a bad miss. He was still better than Kenton, Johnson, Wesolowski, Hughes, O'Grady and Fryatt. Well you cannot actually say that anyone of the players (Maybe Hume) actually played well. There is not one positive thing you can take from that game. I was actually ashamed to have spent my afternoon watching these clowns try and play football. None of them ever seem interested either, I’m sick of these players, board and management team thinking it’s acceptable to turn up perform an afternoons work to that awful standard considering they are justifying their salaries to the people technically pays it, the fans! We need serious changes at all levels at this football club before it’s too late.
Floating Fox Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 I agree with most of what you are saying. Low cannot play on the right wing, He is disgracefull. I dont agree about Porter, O'Grady and mccarthy.
eaststandtom Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 hang on a minute!!! O'Grady? - the guy is a genuine threat and deserve's his place ahead of Iain Hume McCarthy? - played well on Saturday, won the headers in the absence of Kisnorbo Hughes ? - well i'll say he didnt play well and hasnt been on the ball for a while now. why? he needs to play with the right players around him ie, williams, wesolowski. quick players who can play one touch football and make triangles with the play like at the end of last season. this will bring the best out of fryatt too. i think kelly has unneccersarily tinkered with the midfield too much.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 hang on a minute!!! O'Grady? - the guy is a genuine threat and deserve's his place ahead of Iain Hume McCarthy? - played well on Saturday, won the headers in the absence of Kisnorbo Hughes ? - well i'll say he didnt play well and hasnt been on the ball for a while now. why? he needs to play with the right players around him ie, williams, wesolowski. quick players who can play one touch football and make triangles with the play like at the end of last season. this will bring the best out of fryatt too. i think kelly has unneccersarily tinkered with the midfield too much. Okay let's have it. You actually think O'Grady is a better player and offers more of a goal threat than Hume? Okay have just seen on the other thread you're going on current form. Well, Hume has more league goals than O'Grady this season, looked dangerous when he came on on Saturday and by all accounts had a good game against Hereford. O'Grady is just physical presence. There is no sign of any goal anywhere. The idea was that playing him in the team would benefit Fryatt. This patently hasn't happened and even if it did, Fryatt isn't good enough to score the goals of two strikers. We need Hume in the side ASAP. Leaving him out was part of the reason Levein failed so horribly. To be honest I'm not even saying we should drop O'Grady as he is the only physical presence we've got up front but he's such an average player.
Katy Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Josh Low was shite on saturday Andy Johnson was shite on saturday Stephen Hughes was shite on saturday etc etc
Master Fox Posted 25 September 2006 Author Posted 25 September 2006 What qualities does O'Grady offer upfront apart some big bloke to lump the ball forward to for him only then to lose it? He can't score goals and is totally unaware of what's around him. I actually think O'Grady is worse than Trev Benjamin. At least Big Trev could score goals at Championship level
Master Fox Posted 25 September 2006 Author Posted 25 September 2006 Josh Low was shite on saturday Andy Johnson was shite on saturday Stephen Hughes was shite on saturday etc etc No, they are all just shite Great point Kayteh, you know your football!!
eaststandtom Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Okay let's have it. You actually think O'Grady is a better player and offers more of a goal threat than Hume? Okay have just seen on the other thread you're going on current form. Well, Hume has more league goals than O'Grady this season, looked dangerous when he came on on Saturday and by all accounts had a good game against Hereford. O'Grady is just physical presence. There is no sign of any goal anywhere. The idea was that playing him in the team would benefit Fryatt. This patently hasn't happened and even if it did, Fryatt isn't good enough to score the goals of two strikers. We need Hume in the side ASAP. Leaving him out was part of the reason Levein failed so horribly. To be honest I'm not even saying we should drop O'Grady as he is the only physical presence we've got up front but he's such an average player. yeah based, on current form i do think o'grady should be in the team. he was unlucky to be dropped after the west brom game where (i maintain) city didnt play as bad as people have made out. having said that it makes me wonder why hume hasnt got himself in the team. he has the ability to be first on the team sheet and be an attacking threat as we all know. for whatever reason this isnt happening. but lets remember just because he can do this doesnt mean he has to prove himself week in week out which he hasnt been doing. whether this is personal form/attitude etc whatever or kelly tinkering with the midfield is another matter. change the midfield back to resemble what it was hughes williams wesolowski porter then hume must play as it suits his and everyone of those players styles. quick, high tempo (a phrase rob kelly likes to use) and incisive. it is peculiar why the manager has fiddled so much with a winning formula
Katy Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 No, they are all just shite Great point Kayteh, you know your football!! To be honest, it's not rocket science is it?
eaststandtom Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 ''doesnt mean he has DOESNT to prove himself week in week out '' sorry, let me clear up the appalling english there
Fez of Mahrez Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 ''doesnt mean he has DOESNT to prove himself week in week out '' sorry, let me clear up the appalling english there Well cleared. The bottom line is that Hume has to be in the team and the team has to play to his strengths because he is one of only two dynamic players we have who can create something despite the overall team playing like a bunch of twats.
OBO Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Low wasn't up to much on Saturday I'll admit, and that header he missed was probably harder to miss than it was to score, but I don't think he's been THAT bad in the majority of games he's played. He's a lot better than anyone else who has played on that side for us in a while (although that's not saying much I know) and for the most part he will manage to put in a few decent crosses and cause defenders problems. He's not brilliant, but I'd hardly say he's disgraceful or put him in the 'waste of space' bracket alongside Andy Johnson.
DanTheFoxBhoy Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Low wasn't up to much on Saturday I'll admit, and that header he missed was probably harder to miss than it was to score, but I don't think he's been THAT bad in the majority of games he's played. He's a lot better than anyone else who has played on that side for us in a while (although that's not saying much I know) and for the most part he will manage to put in a few decent crosses and cause defenders problems. He's not brilliant, but I'd hardly say he's disgraceful or put him in the 'waste of space' bracket alongside Andy Johnson. Echoing my thoughts, a crap match Sat, but has been a consistent performer in the games he has started. He has definitely added, although overall a small contribution to the midfield problems, the much needed attacking elements that we're seeking. He should be played on the right, Cobblers fans have been through him being played out of position and he's shite if you move him.
Master Fox Posted 25 September 2006 Author Posted 25 September 2006 Echoing my thoughts, a crap match Sat, but has been a consistent performer in the games he has started. He has definitely added, although overall a small contribution to the midfield problems, the much needed attacking elements that we're seeking. He should be played on the right, Cobblers fans have been through him being played out of position and he's shite if you move him. I cannot believe people are actually defending one of the worse players to ever put on a city shirt. If anyone of you that had actually ever played the game you would realise that you have probably played alongside better players in your own teams. Josh Low is not good enough to play at a professional level. It makes me so angry we actually pay him money to play for Leicester City.
holly Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Josh Low is an absolute waste of space. He is no way near good enough to play at Championship level. I want him gone with likes of Andy Johnson, Tiatto, Douglas, Sylla, Porter, Elvis, O’Grady, Hughes, and even McCarthy all them are effing useless players. I’ve seen some awful players over the years at Leicester but this crop are the biggest bunch no hopers with absolute no talent whatsoever, I actually feel embarrassed watching these players try and play football. Kelly out and take your bag of with you! i am sorry but WHAT are u on about?? how the hell can u put porter in that list?? he was our best player on saturday! Low didnt play well on sat and missed a sitter but i would say thats his first bad game and MCarthy wasnt exactly inundated with work to do so how can he of had a bad game! and gettin rid of kelly is going to do nothing, the players all play for him so whats the point in getting rid??? we just cant score and are lacking creativity and this is going to sound really strange but...... the team he picks is an extremly capable team they just arent puttin in the right amount of effort, ie johnson if he put as much effort into chasing balls down and being creative as he does to waving his arms about telling other people what to do he would be really good! anyway i am rambling i just dont see how u have managed to put some of them names in ur list, yeh people are entitled to there own opinions but who else are u suggesting we play???????????
Thracian Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Okay let's have it. You actually think O'Grady is a better player and offers more of a goal threat than Hume? Okay have just seen on the other thread you're going on current form. Well, Hume has more league goals than O'Grady this season, looked dangerous when he came on on Saturday and by all accounts had a good game against Hereford. O'Grady is just physical presence. There is no sign of any goal anywhere. The idea was that playing him in the team would benefit Fryatt. This patently hasn't happened and even if it did, Fryatt isn't good enough to score the goals of two strikers. We need Hume in the side ASAP. Leaving him out was part of the reason Levein failed so horribly. To be honest I'm not even saying we should drop O'Grady as he is the only physical presence we've got up front but he's such an average player. I'd argue that Fryatt is performing worst of the front three and never seems to have been fully fit this season but I still cannot see what'swrong with playing all three in a more flexible formation. Indeed with spend so long playing narrow that I can only see benefits to having Hammond, Hume, Wesolowski, Porter in midfield. If Hammond makes width and/or Hume attacks from midfield Porter can still offer cover in midfield ascan Stearman from right back. Hume and Hammond are also fairly strong players in a physical sense and both seem to enjoy playing with our young team members. Just as important they seem to have the energy in stark contrast to Johnson and Hughes.
Ultra Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Low is, as I've said before, a poor man's Scowcroft. How many of his fans can give one example of how he has improved the team? He's woefully slow, cannot cross a ball and his finishing is of park standard, as was shown AGAIN on Saturday. Not one of our better signings. In fact he may do for Rob Kelly what Joe Hamill did for Levein!
stez Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 Josh Low is an absolute waste of space. He is no way near good enough to play at Championship level. I want him gone with likes of Andy Johnson, Tiatto, Douglas, Sylla, Porter, Elvis, O’Grady, Hughes, and even McCarthy all them are effing useless players. I’ve seen some awful players over the years at Leicester but this crop are the biggest bunch no hopers with absolute no talent whatsoever, I actually feel embarrassed watching these players try and play football. Kelly out and take your bag of with you! so where is all the money coming from to replace these then? maybe he'll write back and say: dear fan, invest millions £ in the club and maybe i could buy someone decent instead of the freebees and nomarks i've had to get from lower leagues and out of contracts yours, your most humble servant RK
Thracian Posted 25 September 2006 Posted 25 September 2006 so where is all the money coming from to replace these then? We're having a collection at the Southampton game. Please save your change!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.