Scow Posted 14 December 2004 Posted 14 December 2004 I've been reading some posts from Forest supporters on another forum, and surprise surprise, they don't rate Impey and Rogers now. I remember last season when they were raving about them, claiming that the comedy duo were one of the main reasons why they stayed up. Impey's been getting some abuse this season, he gave away a penalty at Derby by handballing. Not surprising given how he was known for using his hands in he area when he played for us. I think we could get some joy down the wings on Friday, Gilespie should give Rogers the run around, and Tiatto (If available) should be able to rip in to Impey.
Teeno Posted 14 December 2004 Posted 14 December 2004 Allthough I don't like the Idea this might be a good game to revert to Adams idea of playing strikers on the wings to win the aerial battle there. They are both poor players and I can't wait to rip into them.
Mark Posted 14 December 2004 Posted 14 December 2004 Allthough I don't like the Idea this might be a good game to revert to Adams idea of playing strikers on the wings to win the aerial battle there. 46547[/snapback] No. No. No. Them days are gone, don't try and bring them back
Teeno Posted 14 December 2004 Posted 14 December 2004 Allthough I don't like the Idea this might be a good game to revert to Adams idea of playing strikers on the wings to win the aerial battle there. 46547[/snapback] No. No. No. Them days are gone, don't try and bring them back 46550[/snapback] Don't want to bring them back mate, but we'll need to take advantages of their weaknesses.
Anish Posted 14 December 2004 Posted 14 December 2004 Agreed Petrescu - we needn't hoof it up towards Impey and Rogers - our wingers can't head and if we hoof it to Scowy he'll misdirect his headers and we'll lose the ball Besides, Impey and Rogers are shocking enough without the need to resort to hoofball. We should skin them anyway!
Guest Daniel Posted 14 December 2004 Posted 14 December 2004 There both terrible and ill be laughing my head off at Rogers, hated the guy from day one.
Cobbo Posted 14 December 2004 Posted 14 December 2004 Impey was a good servant for this club, give the guy a break Big part of the O'Neill glory days!
trentend Posted 15 December 2004 Posted 15 December 2004 the all round fitness of the forest players is crap,ie david johnson, cant score to save his life this season, its all down the fattys tactics as a gaffer
Red Mist Posted 15 December 2004 Posted 15 December 2004 I've been reading some posts from Forest supporters on another forum, and surprise surprise, they don't rate Impey and Rogers now. I remember last season when they were raving about them, claiming that the comedy duo were one of the main reasons why they stayed up. Impey's been getting some abuse this season, he gave away a penalty at Derby by handballing. Not surprising given how he was known for using his hands in he area when he played for us. I think we could get some joy down the wings on Friday, Gilespie should give Rogers the run around, and Tiatto (If available) should be able to rip in to Impey. 46541[/snapback] No-one raved about either Impey or Rogers, but they did have an impact last season. They improved things because they filled in two gaping holes in the squad, not because of any intrinsic quality. Bringing in Impey allowed us to play 4-4-2 and provided natural balance that we'd lacked. Rogers was predictably crap last season, but he was the lesser of two evils as he replaced the most out-of-his-depth player I've ever seen. To be fair, Impey was reasonable (if somewhat uninspiring) on loan last season when he was playing for a contract. This season he's been an utter disgrace - completely disinterested as well as being inept and a liability. They were decent stopgaps for last season and served a purpose. Kinnear's mistake was to think that, because we'd had a good run at the end of the season, he had to keep that squad together - there would have been far better options than wasting two wages on that pair.
Forest fan Posted 17 December 2004 Posted 17 December 2004 I've been reading some posts from Forest supporters on another forum, and surprise surprise, they don't rate Impey and Rogers now. I remember last season when they were raving about them, claiming that the comedy duo were one of the main reasons why they stayed up. Impey's been getting some abuse this season, he gave away a penalty at Derby by handballing. Not surprising given how he was known for using his hands in he area when he played for us. I think we could get some joy down the wings on Friday, Gilespie should give Rogers the run around, and Tiatto (If available) should be able to rip in to Impey. 46541[/snapback] No-one raved about either Impey or Rogers, but they did have an impact last season. They improved things because they filled in two gaping holes in the squad, not because of any intrinsic quality. Bringing in Impey allowed us to play 4-4-2 and provided natural balance that we'd lacked. Rogers was predictably crap last season, but he was the lesser of two evils as he replaced the most out-of-his-depth player I've ever seen. To be fair, Impey was reasonable (if somewhat uninspiring) on loan last season when he was playing for a contract. This season he's been an utter disgrace - completely disinterested as well as being inept and a liability. They were decent stopgaps for last season and served a purpose. Kinnear's mistake was to think that, because we'd had a good run at the end of the season, he had to keep that squad together - there would have been far better options than wasting two wages on that pair. 46982[/snapback] Totally agree, Rogers a Impey are both shite & no Forest fan bragged about them, no Forest fan said that they were a major part in us staying up so cut the bullshit Scowy!
Scow Posted 17 December 2004 Author Posted 17 December 2004 I've been reading some posts from Forest supporters on another forum, and surprise surprise, they don't rate Impey and Rogers now. I remember last season when they were raving about them, claiming that the comedy duo were one of the main reasons why they stayed up. Impey's been getting some abuse this season, he gave away a penalty at Derby by handballing. Not surprising given how he was known for using his hands in he area when he played for us. I think we could get some joy down the wings on Friday, Gilespie should give Rogers the run around, and Tiatto (If available) should be able to rip in to Impey. 46541[/snapback] No-one raved about either Impey or Rogers, but they did have an impact last season. They improved things because they filled in two gaping holes in the squad, not because of any intrinsic quality. Bringing in Impey allowed us to play 4-4-2 and provided natural balance that we'd lacked. Rogers was predictably crap last season, but he was the lesser of two evils as he replaced the most out-of-his-depth player I've ever seen. To be fair, Impey was reasonable (if somewhat uninspiring) on loan last season when he was playing for a contract. This season he's been an utter disgrace - completely disinterested as well as being inept and a liability. They were decent stopgaps for last season and served a purpose. Kinnear's mistake was to think that, because we'd had a good run at the end of the season, he had to keep that squad together - there would have been far better options than wasting two wages on that pair. 46982[/snapback] Totally agree, Rogers a Impey are both shite & no Forest fan bragged about them, no Forest fan said that they were a major part in us staying up so cut the bullshit Scowy! 47451[/snapback] Oh yes they did. Last season they were a major part in you staying up according to a number of Forest fans, but you don't want to admit how silly you sound now.
FOREST4EVA Posted 18 December 2004 Posted 18 December 2004 did we ####. 47454[/snapback] Nope we didn't
Cobbo Posted 18 December 2004 Posted 18 December 2004 Rogers' wing work was immense. Impey's beard was good to be fair
FOREST4EVA Posted 18 December 2004 Posted 18 December 2004 Rogers' wing work was immense. Impey's beard was good to be fair 47589[/snapback] so you don't want then back then
Forest fan Posted 18 December 2004 Posted 18 December 2004 Rogers' wing work was immense. Impey's beard was good to be fair 47589[/snapback] so you don't want then back then 47590[/snapback] £2mill each! giveaway price for some wworld class youngsters
Wellman Posted 18 December 2004 Posted 18 December 2004 After watching them both last night, i'm glad we got rid of them both . They've come on leaps and bounds
Scow Posted 18 December 2004 Author Posted 18 December 2004 did we ####. 47454[/snapback] Nope we didn't 47587[/snapback] Yes you did.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.