stez Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 <_< he's an odd one, and for that reason he gives good 'i'm a....'
davieG Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 ..and good looking He's dead ugly compared to me, younger granted but ugggggggglllllllllyyyyyyyy
cisono Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 He's dead ugly compared to me, younger granted but ugggggggglllllllllyyyyyyyy He's dead ugly full stop! (Too much - rubbish - plastic surgery... allegedly?)
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 We're going to need photographic evidence, davieG.
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 We're going to need photographic evidence, davieG. or pornographic evidence will do
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 or pornographic evidence will do Not all of us are into public displays of lust... ... Mr. Collymore.
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Not all of us are into public displays of lust... ... Mr. Collymore. Is that a cry for help Mr LWICD? I'm sure you will find someone who will be!
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Is that a cry for help Mr LWICD? Why, you offering some?
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Why, you offering some? what of davieg? I promised him i'd never publish it. Edit to say, this is not making sense now! But who cares!
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 what of davieg? I promised him i'd never publish it. Edit to say, this is not making sense now! But who cares! I was thinking more in terms of car parks than footballers.
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 I was thinking more in terms of car parks than footballers. I was think more in terms of public toilets than car parks.
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 I was think more in terms of public toilets than car parks. Never gave it much though. I prefer to be away from places like that, it seems too unhygienic and impersonal. Especially when you can't see the other person involved.
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Never gave it much though. I prefer to be away from places like that, it seems too unhygienic and impersonal. Especially when you can't see the other person involved. Now you see what happens to a thread when you call it 'davieG'
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Now you see what happens to a thread when you call it 'davieG' This thread, or most of it, is heading straight for the bin and onwards to the local tip/incinerator. Which, coincidentally, is not a good place for it either.
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Never gave it much though. I prefer to be away from places like that, it seems too unhygienic and impersonal. Especially when you can't see the other person involved. Is that through lighting or positioning issues?
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 This thread, or most of it, is heading straight for the bin and onwards to the local tip/incinerator. Which, coincidentally, is not a good place for it either. ...or it could go on to beat the 'MM formal bid' thread!
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Is that through lighting or positioning issues? In the worst cases, both. Positioning, mostly.
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 ...or it could go on to beat the 'MM formal bid' thread! What for - gossip, innuendo and lunacy; or are we just talking strictly in terms of post count?
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 In the worst cases, both. Positioning, mostly. Well buy a torch and find a disabled loo
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Well buy a torch and find a disabled loo Size isn't the issue here... walls are. If only one had x-ray vision, one may see...
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Size isn't the issue here... walls are. If only one had x-ray vision, one may see... Who needs x-ray vision when peep hole cameras are so effective
lookwhaticando Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 Who needs x-ray vision when peep hole cameras are so effective To be honest, the whole lark costs enough as it is, without havin' to buy a friggin' camera too. Park bench?
Collymore Posted 17 November 2006 Posted 17 November 2006 To be honest, the whole lark costs enough as it is, without havin' to buy a friggin' camera too. Park bench? Is that a rhetorical question!?!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.