potter3 Posted 6 June 2007 Author Posted 6 June 2007 What the fock is going on in here?? Music lessons
stez Posted 6 June 2007 Posted 6 June 2007 much as i dislike single smilie replies; actually, it's not a single smilie reply, because, interesting as all this is, what use is it? no really...... see, i'm not big on stats, i'm a free thinker (when i'm allowed) i live on the cutting edge (on bedding schemes and such) i'm dangerous; stez-dangerous and i feel a name change coming on
lookwhaticando Posted 6 June 2007 Posted 6 June 2007 Or Biology. Classic. After the fiasco that was maximum likelihood estimates and multivariate distributions I decided to stop doing stats. MLE's were piss easy - says me. They could get ugly at times, but at least they were predictable. Power and Hypothesis testing were the only troublesome crap in terms of theory. Practical Hypothesis testing is sensationally easy, but actually developing the test to begin with... that's the troublesome bit. Particularly for multivariate distributions. Moral: let someone else find the best test or use an existing test. Pardon If you ever take stats (theory course) at university, you'll know.
lookwhaticando Posted 6 June 2007 Posted 6 June 2007 :laugh: Imeant: What, where did this come from, dear moderators? Oh yes... that ol' chestnut. I decided that it had no place in the Leicester City forum... so like a midwife, I ripped this little string of posts from the Womb of the Metric Point system by Daggers... and placed it on the scales known as General Chat. Like any good midwife, I dropped the bastard on it's head before I got to the scales, but I did clean up the blood and goo once I placed it safely on said scales. Who said I couldn't do analogies?
Alexikokopops Posted 6 June 2007 Posted 6 June 2007 MLE's were piss easy - says me. They could get ugly at times, but at least they were predictable. Power and Hypothesis testing were the only troublesome crap in terms of theory. Practical Hypothesis testing is sensationally easy, but actually developing the test to begin with... that's the troublesome bit. Particularly for multivariate distributions. Once I understood them they were ok, unfortunately my poor attendance last year didn't help. I think my mark in the Math Stats module I did last year show this. 22% in Math Stats A, 72% in Math Stats B. From a fail to a first, ideal.
Zingari Posted 7 June 2007 Posted 7 June 2007 Once I understood them they were ok, unfortunately my poor attendance last year didn't help. I think my mark in the Math Stats module I did last year show this. 22% in Math Stats A, 72% in Math Stats B. From a fail to a first, ideal. alexikokopops sounds like a greek name so you've got a head start on the rest of us
potter3 Posted 7 June 2007 Author Posted 7 June 2007 alexikokopops sounds like a greek name so you've got a head start on the rest of us Sounds like a Nestlé name to me
Alexikokopops Posted 7 June 2007 Posted 7 June 2007 Apparently I'm half Greek, half Egyptian and half English. Make of that what you will.
potter3 Posted 7 June 2007 Author Posted 7 June 2007 Apparently I'm half Greek, half Egyptian and half English. Make of that what you will. And halk chocolate flavoured cereal?
Alexikokopops Posted 7 June 2007 Posted 7 June 2007 And halk chocolate flavoured cereal? All all chocolate covered cereal baby.
AoWW Posted 7 June 2007 Posted 7 June 2007 All all chocolate covered cereal baby. "tasty, tasty, very very tasty, it's very tasty"... oops, sorry, wrong cereal.
Alexikokopops Posted 7 June 2007 Posted 7 June 2007 "tasty, tasty, very very tasty, it's very tasty"... oops, sorry, wrong cereal. Oh I'm tasty...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.