Lord Nibblington Posted 29 June 2007 Posted 29 June 2007 I'd say Defoe's the better player because unlike Bent, he has the ability to create chances for himself. Bent relies on other players to create his chances for him, so if he were in a crap team he wouldn't look half as good. That's why he never really set the world alight when he was at Ipswich. Still managed to get 13 in a poor Charlton side last year. And the year before that, they weren't exactly flushed with good players.
Stuliasz Posted 30 June 2007 Posted 30 June 2007 Surely this now gives Charlton enough money to restart the women's team?
Father Ted Posted 30 June 2007 Posted 30 June 2007 Keane just recently signed a new contract at 'spurs. I expect Keane and Berbatov to be the starting two.
Simi Posted 30 June 2007 Posted 30 June 2007 What the **** are Charlton going to do with 16 and a half million. Buy more 'Paddy 'bomb scare' McCarthy' type players for ridiculous prices with any luck.
Flynny Posted 30 June 2007 Posted 30 June 2007 Bent relies on other players to create his chances for him, so if he were in a crap team he wouldn't look half as good. That's why he never really set the world alight when he was at Ipswich. Charlton ARE a crap team you loon. Bent's the better player. No way he's worth even 10 million, though. Let alone half a million MORE than Henry. I'm assuming Jol is thinking he needs people who can play alongside Berbatov. With him as the creative striker his partner should be the sort of player Bent is.
city1993 Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Had to say bent really because I think Defoe is useless, however I don't really rate Bent much either. Do any of you guys think he is actually worht 16.5 million ? Seriously.
Tommeh Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Had to say bent really because I think Defoe is useless, however I don't really rate Bent much either. Do any of you guys think he is actually worht 16.5 million ? Seriously. There is obviously a huge premium in bringing home grown talent in. so looking at recent English players moves £18m for carrick, £17m for Hargreaves, £21m for SWP, £12m for walcott plus the huge prices discussed for Micah Richards I actually think £16 is about right for Bent. Don't get me wrong its still way too much but the figure certainly ties in with the way football is going.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.