Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
dandannieldanok

D. Bent Vs Defoe

Who is better in your opinion?  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. Darrent Bent or Jermain Defoe

    • Darren Bent
      21
    • Jermain Defoe
      27


Recommended Posts

Posted
I'd say Defoe's the better player because unlike Bent, he has the ability to create chances for himself. Bent relies on other players to create his chances for him, so if he were in a crap team he wouldn't look half as good. That's why he never really set the world alight when he was at Ipswich.

Still managed to get 13 in a poor Charlton side last year.

And the year before that, they weren't exactly flushed with good players.

Posted
What the **** are Charlton going to do with 16 and a half million. :blink::blink:

Buy more 'Paddy 'bomb scare' McCarthy' type players for ridiculous prices with any luck.

Posted
Bent relies on other players to create his chances for him, so if he were in a crap team he wouldn't look half as good. That's why he never really set the world alight when he was at Ipswich.

Charlton ARE a crap team you loon.

Bent's the better player. No way he's worth even 10 million, though. Let alone half a million MORE than Henry. I'm assuming Jol is thinking he needs people who can play alongside Berbatov. With him as the creative striker his partner should be the sort of player Bent is.

Posted

Had to say bent really because I think Defoe is useless, however I don't really rate Bent much either. Do any of you guys think he is actually worht 16.5 million ? Seriously.

Posted
Had to say bent really because I think Defoe is useless, however I don't really rate Bent much either. Do any of you guys think he is actually worht 16.5 million ? Seriously.

There is obviously a huge premium in bringing home grown talent in. so looking at recent English players moves £18m for carrick, £17m for Hargreaves, £21m for SWP, £12m for walcott plus the huge prices discussed for Micah Richards I actually think £16 is about right for Bent. Don't get me wrong its still way too much but the figure certainly ties in with the way football is going.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...