Forest's Goal

[spirefox]

Just before his goal Taylor was booked for late challenge on Heath who had to leave pitch after treatment.Virtually immediately afterwards Taylor scores without challenge.I haven't seen a replay but I felt at the time that Heath had not had time to get back into position.Did anybody else think this?

[Craig]

We were punished by not taking our chances. If they'd have scored 4, with the chances we had, i'd still have expected us to win.

[Anish]

You're being too kind on Heath I think - he was on the pitch long enough to mark Taylor...which he obviously didn't do.

[spirefox]

You're probably right ,in which case we can expect McCarthy to start on Tuesday.I still think it's a crap rule when a fouled player has to go off and leave his team short.Why don't they make the fouling player go off as well,especially when they've been booked.

[Benji]

agreed the rule sucks, why should you be at a disadvantage for being fouled surely you should only go off if play is stopped for you

oh well, but like craig says, rogers might have been offside i dunno not seen replay yet but we shouldn't need to rely on officials. We should have been 3 or 4 up before that point

only ourselves to blame

[TrickyTrev]

He was on the pitch long before the goal, it was just poor defending by Heath, Maybury and somebody else who let Taylor stand in between all three of them unmarked.

[Benji]

tiatto on the back post, made me chuckle to be fair, if only someone with a bit of height read the game like he did to get on the back post

[Bedford Fox]

That Law is stupid and needs to be scrapped! Why doesnt a goalie have to do it is inconsistant and pointless!

[Scow]

Two players unmarked at the back post, shocking defending.

The ball shouldn't have got to Rogers wide left in the first place...