Fez of Mahrez Posted 12 January 2008 Posted 12 January 2008 Not convinced by Kavanagh at all. Osbourne, Weso and King would be sufficient backup for Oakley and Clemence, I would say. Scott Sinclair would be a hell of a signing, hope it goes through. Going on today's performance though, how do you fit him in?! He would have to play but seems harsh on Bori to drop him.
lildave3 Posted 12 January 2008 Posted 12 January 2008 Not convinced by Kavanagh at all. Osbourne, Weso and King would be sufficient backup for Oakley and Clemence, I would say.Scott Sinclair would be a hell of a signing, hope it goes through. Going on today's performance though, how do you fit him in?! He would have to play but seems harsh on Bori to drop him. Why would it be Bori? And why would he have to play?
Fez of Mahrez Posted 12 January 2008 Posted 12 January 2008 Why would it be Bori? And why would he have to play? Cos Laczko is bloody brilliant and cos Scott Sinclair is bloody brilliant as well. As decent as Bori was today, I reckon Holloway was only using him reluctantly. Ah well, we'll have to wait and see.
lildave3 Posted 12 January 2008 Posted 12 January 2008 Cos Laczko is bloody brilliant and cos Scott Sinclair is bloody brilliant as well. As decent as Bori was today, I reckon Holloway was only using him reluctantly.Ah well, we'll have to wait and see. Poor old Gabor Who says he's not bloody brilliant? Besides, we could always drop Hume On a serious note, I think it's unlikely we'll get Sinclair.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 12 January 2008 Posted 12 January 2008 Poor old Gabor Who says he's not bloody brilliant? Besides, we could always drop Hume On a serious note, I think it's unlikely we'll get Sinclair. I left the paper in Alex's bag. I would be annoyed if the Sinclair deal fell through now.
lildave3 Posted 12 January 2008 Posted 12 January 2008 I left the paper in Alex's bag. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Bastard. I went to all the effort of getting the paper, seperating the paper from it's actual paper, bringing the paper, giving you the paper, demanding 10% of your eventual wages from said paper, getting offered 65p of your eventual wages from said paper, and then you go and toss it away. Hmph. That's the last time I put effort into anything.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 12 January 2008 Posted 12 January 2008 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:Bastard. I went to all the effort of getting the paper, seperating the paper from it's actual paper, bringing the paper, giving you the paper, demanding 10% of your eventual wages from said paper, getting offered 65p of your eventual wages from said paper, and then you go and toss it away. Hmph. That's the last time I put effort into anything. Yes. It could have gone slightly better, I concur. He's bringing it to Norwich, if we go.
lildave3 Posted 12 January 2008 Posted 12 January 2008 Yes. It could have gone slightly better, I concur.He's bringing it to Norwich, if we go. Besides, I never got my handsome reward. Unless it was Alex ... In which case, I didn't get my handsome reward
Babylon Posted 13 January 2008 Posted 13 January 2008 Still need wingers to cover Bori and Zsolt.Also could need a left back possibly.
morris1234 Posted 13 January 2008 Posted 13 January 2008 left back - capaldi or harley centre back - somebody quick (well, quicker than mcauley) back up winger(s) - might not have to get 2, if one gets injured then hume could be get moved onto the wing and bring hayles, dj or fryatt on! maybe a better back up goalkeeper!!
lcfc_lukey Posted 13 January 2008 Posted 13 January 2008 Why a left back everyone? I think Mattock and Sheehan are good enough for this division. Who would you replace then with? I don't think you have seen many matches this season if you think that? They all look like ducks out of water, defo need full backs for both sides!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.