dog_4 Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 bet u any money his four signings will be shite. if i was him i'd sign stewart taylor,commons and kazim-richards and someone else but instead we will sign shite like momo sylla and that goalkeeper on trial
Durnerz Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 bet u any money his four signings will be shite. if i was him i'd sign stewart taylor,commons and kazim-richards and someone else but instead we will sign shite like momo sylla and that goalkeeper on trial 105075[/snapback] So you'd like a goalkeeper who cannot kick, a man who looks good in a bad team and shite in an average one and an unproven, you have no right to say Leveins signings will be shite when you make those suggestions IMO. Were you saying the same when he signed hughes and maybury?
dog_4 Posted 8 May 2005 Author Posted 8 May 2005 hmmm taylor is a fine goalkeeper. part from goalkicking he is better then walker and three times cheaper. can easily rectify the problem with his goalkicking,commons went to white hart lane and ripped them apart so i wudn't say he is a player who looks good in a poor side and kazim richards is quality by the way so give him a chance. had no problem with maybury and hughes but i don't wanna see us signing shit players the standard of mark de vries
Mad Jacks Eyes Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 bet u any money his four signings will be shite. if i was him i'd sign stewart taylor,commons and kazim-richards and someone else but instead we will sign shite like momo sylla and that goalkeeper on trial 105075[/snapback] Bloody hell, the season has just finished and already people are slagging off signings we haven't even made. Do you have a bloody crystal ball or something???? Wait until 1)The signings are made 2) We have played a few games next season. And then decide what the signings are like. Have a nice day!
Durnerz Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 hmmm taylor is a fine goalkeeper. part from goalkicking he is better then walker and three times cheaper. can easily rectify the problem with his goalkicking,commons went to white hart lane and ripped them apart so i wudn't say he is a player who looks good in a poor side and kazim richards is quality by the way so give him a chance. had no problem with maybury and hughes but i don't wanna see us signing shit players the standard of mark de vries 105097[/snapback] Three times cheaper??? Arsenal will want at least a million for him You cannot judge commons on one game, at the walkers he was nothing special, likewise when he was at Stoke. You said to give Kazim Richards a chance yet Mark De Vries has yet to gain full fitness with us and you're already slagging him off!
Anish Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 hmmm taylor is a fine goalkeeper. part from goalkicking he is better then walker and three times cheaper. can easily rectify the problem with his goalkicking,commons went to white hart lane and ripped them apart so i wudn't say he is a player who looks good in a poor side and kazim richards is quality by the way so give him a chance. had no problem with maybury and hughes but i don't wanna see us signing shit players the standard of mark de vries 105097[/snapback] You say give Kazim Richards a chance - so give the players who actually come to the club a chance before slagging them off saying they are gonna be shit signings!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.