Annoyed letter to F.A

[ozleicester]

If your going to shut up shop do it properly, lack of temprement and nerve cost us the game on Saturday as much as the ref.

Agreed

And given the amount of money we have spent we really should be the Barcelona of the league.

Disagree

However it is still early days and hopefully we can get back on track, a point at the City Ground when all is said and done is not really a bad result.

Agreed

[danlcfc4ever]

yes

I'm a big fan of Dom , tenacious little blighter ain't he ?

The blokes an ankle biter! haha

In regards to the letter, be interesting to see if you get a response! If you do, i assume you will post it on here?

[pyro79]

can you also add in your letter that nugent was offside.

forest would then have won 2-1

cheers mate

[okie fox]

can you also add in your letter that nugent was offside.

forest would then have won 2-1

cheers mate

Nugent was level with the ball when it was passed, hence not offside.

[pyro79]

Nugent was level with the ball when it was passed, hence not offside.

the french stream i watched proved nugent was offside.

[Guest MattP]

can you also add in your letter that nugent was offside.

forest would then have won 2-1

cheers mate

It was tight as anything, could of gone either way.

[philce]

It was tight as anything, could of gone either way.

What about Boateng's foul before he scored?

[Guest MattP]

What about Boateng's foul before he scored?

I don't think it was a foul, he jumped and attacked the ball, Konchesky stayed on the floor (no idea why)

I would absolutely fume if we had a goal dissallowed for a player attacking the football. The benefit of the doubt should always go with the attacker. Nugent's goal should stand as any doubt on offside should go with attackers and so should Boatengs.

Of course again the whole thing can be avoided if our goalkeeper does his job properly.

[philce]

I don't think it was a foul, he jumped and attacked the ball, Konchesky stayed on the floor (no idea why)

I would absolutely fume if we had a goal dissallowed for a player attacking the football. The benefit of the doubt should always go with the attacker. Nugent's goal should stand as any doubt on offside should go with attackers and so should Boatengs.

Of course again the whole thing can be avoided if our goalkeeper does his job properly.

Looked like he pushed him over to me.

[Darkon84]

can you also add in your letter that nugent was offside.

forest would then have won 2-1

cheers mate

The ball was played backwards. Therefore no offside

EDIT: scrap what i said before

[C.J]

Good on ya mate, shame you probably wont get a reply.

[Guest ttfn]

I don't think it was a foul, he jumped and attacked the ball, Konchesky stayed on the floor (no idea why)

I would absolutely fume if we had a goal dissallowed for a player attacking the football. The benefit of the doubt should always go with the attacker. Nugent's goal should stand as any doubt on offside should go with attackers and so should Boatengs.

Of course again the whole thing can be avoided if our goalkeeper does his job properly.

Anywhere else on the pitch, that's a foul.

I thought at the time Nugent was offside - I've not seen anything since that disproves it due to the woeful coverage provided by the FLS. They didn't even consider the possibility that it might be offside.

[Blue Maniac]

Christ.