Deathside Posted 15 July 2005 Posted 15 July 2005 IF YOU KNEW THAT YOU`D LOSE YOUR LIFE IF CAUGHT KILLING SOMEONE, OR ROBBING SOMEONE, WOULD YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT IT, LET ALONE DO IT?134017[/snapback] So Mr Lush you would agree that Charlie Sargent should now be a dead man? And should I place David Copeland in the same category?
lush Posted 16 July 2005 Author Posted 16 July 2005 I dont know who they are, but im guessing they committed some sort of crime? I think there should be a law that encourages people not to commit crime.
Thracian Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 IF YOU KNEW THAT YOU`D LOSE YOUR LIFE IF CAUGHT KILLING SOMEONE, OR ROBBING SOMEONE, WOULD YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT IT, LET ALONE DO IT?134017[/snapback] So Mr Lush you would agree that Charlie Sargent should now be a dead man? And should I place David Copeland in the same category? 138969[/snapback] The BBC facilitated yet another party political broadcast on behalf of the Muslim community as part of their news coverage around 9.30 this morning... which can't be bad can it. Kill 54 people and get your own daily publicity forum. Anyway the slant of dialogue was that a young Muslim called for more direction from his Imams in providing a democratic-action alternative to their violent anger about what is happening in Iraq and Afghanistan (whatever that has to do with the women and other workers - including Muslims - murdered in London) . So get ready for the Muslims seeking further political influence and exerting still greater political pressure within our society as a reward for their outrages (while we PROBABLY MISGUIDEDLY try to destroy terrorists and torturers in favour of introducing democracy to an oppressed society and greater freedoms (of education, career, human rights etc) for their women. And get ready for more capitulation aided and abetted, no doubt, by the Government and its puppet broadcaster, the BBC . Much of the TV publicity centred on the "apologies" of bombers families for the actions of their sons. One has to wonder where they went wrong in educating their children and warning them of people who would pray on their minds. "You would never know they were anything but normal," are the words that have rung out clearly about the bombers. Well, if you'd never know, how come so many Muslims are allowed into our society from areas which are a hotbed of fundamentalism? And are people truly suggesting a parent "would never know". I believe I would know and know quickly if something or someone was aggling the mind of my sons and if, as had happened with at least one of the bombers, they went abroad to Pakistan (or anywhere else) I would want to know where they were going, who they were staying with, what they were going to do and, if necessary why they were going to do it. One finally wonders, (after the apologies and pleas for information about potential suspects, which was welcome) what the families themselves will do having the burden of 54 innocent deaths on their consciences. I ask because some Muslim fathers have killed or harshly punished their own daughters for bringing sexual shame on the family. If that is the case what on earth will be the effect and shame of having 54 innocent bodies on their consciences?. Will they have to answer to their God and, if so, what on earth will they say?. Will they seek martyrdom themselves so they can try to finally mend the minds of their sons or will they question or reject a religion which has brought such shame on them (through so-called servants of that religion). In other words will the lethal consequences of those criminal bombings continue in ever-widening directions as if the original consequenses were not enough? Those of course, are the sort of questions I would have put to a Muslim representative on television (which explains why I would never get a job as an interviewer). The BBC interviewers were much more diplomatic and sympathetic. Perhaps they were afraid of their bosses or perhaps THEY didn't have relatives or friends being shovelled off the tube train. If neither of these were true then were the tv interviewers consciously trying to further erode the fabric of our society by brushing over the most monstrous of criminal attrocities by gracefully accepting apologies?. And, was I the only listener who found it absolutely shameful?
Deathside Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 IF YOU KNEW THAT YOU`D LOSE YOUR LIFE IF CAUGHT KILLING SOMEONE, OR ROBBING SOMEONE, WOULD YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT IT, LET ALONE DO IT?134017[/snapback] So Mr Lush you would agree that Charlie Sargent should now be a dead man? And should I place David Copeland in the same category? 138969[/snapback] I dont know who they are, but im guessing they committed some sort of crime? I think there should be a law that encourages people not to commit crime. 138994[/snapback] You really don't know who these people are? - You surprise me Uncle Google can help you with Charlie Sargent You can refresh your memory of London bomber David Copeland here
lush Posted 16 July 2005 Author Posted 16 July 2005 You really don't know who these people are? - You surprise meUncle Google can help you with Charlie Sargent You can refresh your memory of London bomber David Copeland here 139007[/snapback] Why should i know who these people are you do surprise me I remember hearing about copeland, but never heard of the other one. So why did you only mention those scum bags with far right views, why not blair or someone else with far left views for example?
lush Posted 16 July 2005 Author Posted 16 July 2005 And, was I the only listener who found it absolutely shameful? 139003[/snapback] On newsnight, last night, a reporter said "a group of 50 white men, believed to be linked to the far right". "believed"? so is it ok for me to go on national tv and say that reporter is "believed" to be a paedophille? Wheres his evidence that there of far right nature, and if they are, since when has that been a crime, thats the impression he gave. My point is, such media wrong doings inflate tensions, where there arnt any, and thats seriously unprofessional. The same could be said about the same company about similar politically motivated people in that infamous bnp documentary. By fueling the racists with alcohol and encouraging them to say all kinds of hate fulled resetment towards the bradford asian community, on national tv, could`ve sparked serious tension, and blame would then be attached to the bbc. The bbc have a resposibility to the community they work for, yes Thracian, i too find their production sometimes shameful.
Deathside Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 You really don't know who these people are? - You surprise meUncle Google can help you with Charlie Sargent You can refresh your memory of London bomber David Copeland here 139007[/snapback] Why should i know who these people are you do surprise me I remember hearing about copeland, but never heard of the other one. So why did you only mention those scum bags with far right views, why not blair or someone else with far left views for example? 139010[/snapback] Quite simply, I am interested to see how you connect these characters with your view that the bnp most represent the indigenous way of life
lush Posted 16 July 2005 Author Posted 16 July 2005 You really don't know who these people are? - You surprise meUncle Google can help you with Charlie Sargent You can refresh your memory of London bomber David Copeland here 139007[/snapback] Why should i know who these people are you do surprise me I remember hearing about copeland, but never heard of the other one. So why did you only mention those scum bags with far right views, why not blair or someone else with far left views for example? 139010[/snapback] Quite simply, I am interested to see how you connect these characters with your view that the bnp most represent the indigenous way of life 139017[/snapback] The bnp talk about preserving indigenous culture, more than any other political party that i know of. You cant blame a company when idiots attach themselves to you. you can only disasociate yourselves from them. On the flip side, if you think labour represent the indigenous population, what about their searchlight fascists, who attack the indigenous `protecters`? Attacking people is NOT part of indigenous culture.
Deathside Posted 16 July 2005 Posted 16 July 2005 The bnp talk about preserving indigenous culture, more than any other political party that i know of.You cant blame a company when idiots attach themselves to you. you can only disasociate yourselves from them. On the flip side, if you think labour represent the indigenous population, what about their searchlight fascists, who attack the indigenous `protecters`? Attacking people is NOT part of indigenous culture. 139020[/snapback] If attacking people is not part of indigenous culture then clearly your bnp friends are unable to represent the indigenous way of life
Guest Posted 17 July 2005 Posted 17 July 2005 Isn't this the same person who the other day wanted non-Britons out of this country? 138688[/snapback] Quote me? Where is the next dictatorship country to England, where people fear their very lives? 138695[/snapback] I was asking a question, not stating a fact, you thicko. Can't someone shut this narrow-minded imbecile up? It's getting very tedious now. It's quite clear he can't think rationally, and seems incapable of holding a reasoned debate, and seeing as nobody agrees with his paranoid and melodrantic views, I say close this thread and every other one he's kept going over and over the same point with.
lush Posted 19 July 2005 Author Posted 19 July 2005 The bnp talk about preserving indigenous culture, more than any other political party that i know of.You cant blame a company when idiots attach themselves to you. you can only disasociate yourselves from them. On the flip side, if you think labour represent the indigenous population, what about their searchlight fascists, who attack the indigenous `protecters`? Attacking people is NOT part of indigenous culture. 139020[/snapback] If attacking people is not part of indigenous culture then clearly your bnp friends are unable to represent the indigenous way of life 139027[/snapback] "friends"? you have a wildly assuming set of bones. Attacking people unecessarily is not part of indigenous culture, or any other decent culture, but defending yourself from evil is. What about labours "searchlight" criminal gang? Do labour represent the indigenous peoples?
lush Posted 19 July 2005 Author Posted 19 July 2005 Isn't this the same person who the other day wanted non-Britons out of this country? 138688[/snapback] Quote me? Where is the next dictatorship country to England, where people fear their very lives? 138695[/snapback] I was asking a question, not stating a fact, you thicko. Can't someone shut this narrow-minded imbecile up? It's getting very tedious now. It's quite clear he can't think rationally, and seems incapable of holding a reasoned debate, and seeing as nobody agrees with his paranoid and melodrantic views, I say close this thread and every other one he's kept going over and over the same point with. 139537[/snapback] Your full of contradictions Run on.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.