Guest ttfn Posted 12 September 2014 Posted 12 September 2014 A response Pretty sure I explained in some detail last time why one of the key tenets of that argument - the "inefficiency" of the crown estate - was complete guff and betrayed a fundamental lack of understanding of the mantra of that organisation and the property market in general.
Harry - LCFC Posted 12 September 2014 Posted 12 September 2014 Pretty sure I explained in some detail last time why one of the key tenets of that argument - the "inefficiency" of the crown estate - was complete guff and betrayed a fundamental lack of understanding of the mantra of that organisation and the property market in general. You probably did. You seem rather proud of it after all.
Guest ttfn Posted 12 September 2014 Posted 12 September 2014 You probably did. You seem rather proud of it after all. There's a difference between being proud and being confused as to why the same ill-informed nonsense continues to be posted. I don't have an opinion on this, but you can't go around posting things as fact when they're anything but. Royal finances are opaque and that is a problem in itself. Transparency would allow people to make an informed argument rather than the speculation which exists on both sides.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.