Jackubu

Should've helped them write their statement. That's exactly the sentiment they believe in and profess to the football club

The bloke literally encourages the club to ban fans he doesn't like and makes up lies about other supporters groups to support his agenda.

This is exactly what people need to register for https://www.lcfc.com/pages/en/your-90-minutes?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwMH0WNjbGNrAwfRU2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAAEe1T5P9aer3t5EiDBfOGP7NTEmHVm4_t6djkyG_wj4GP-hUPNP2X_8J6FrHqE_aem_AqJgBa8230gRTn_8PBpU8g

We used to have a stall at the ground on matchdays which was a great way for us to interact with the wider fan base. The club unfortunately shut it down citing health and safety/lack of space

It really needs fans who support the tifos or broadly UFS, to contact the club about removing barriers to tifos and making the groups life less excruciating.

I disagree. He "leads" fan engagement at board level so is directly accountable.

Nailed it.

That's exactly how it works now tbf

I'm only one member of UFS but for me, very unpopular. It's a shambles

Thank you for your work on this. I've criticised the trust for its lack of action over the past few years under Bason. Lynn and the new board members have re-energised the trust. You will make a difference

I was stood about 10m from it, it was an incredibly clear penalty from my view (middle of the pitches) and the ref was bang on. Think one of the lads told me I'd been drinking all day when I told them it was a correct decision - amusing really as it's the only year I've not hammered the bevs during the tournament 😂 Good effort from the Kasey lot though, played brilliant football and I'd called them out to be winners early on, so not surprised it came down to small margins.

Good for them to see a team worse than Bochum tbf.

Not one important topic or outcome from that meeting - it's been that way for years. So boring reading every meeting minutes where the club are lambasted for poor communication and they just nod their heads before moving on. Supporter groups really need to withdraw support from these committees and meetings until there are assurances the club take them seriously.

And the person who agreed to it was told by various people it'd be a bad idea to do so. The overall reaction seen to the FAB in recent weeks shouldnt be surprising to anyone who had conversations about it prior to it being confirmed.

But the board hasn't demonstrated that. It's the complete opposite

I would like to thank the previous chair of the Foxestrust board for agreeing with the FAB structure, thus creating no fan engagement but helping the club tick it's fan engagement box.

You only needed the second paragraph here, FYI.

😂😂 Of course

Man drinks at football and uses expletives = ban. Cool 👍

Crazy thing here is seeing how many other bans are coming out of the woodwork. Dread to think how many there actually is...

Saw his FB post. Would be very surprised if he's done anything actually wrong. Poor bloke

Have tried the FA before and they're not the most supportive. They have alot of admin & fees around being an affiliated tournament before they'll help.

Only blindfolded.

Beaumont seems to be fully booked for May & June already. Didn't expect that. Have sent a message to AP