Strokes

For me thats why i like gambling, you are usually intrested in the game until the very last minute. I usually only put small stakes on but this weekend have steaked about £90. Im about £8 down in total and have been in most bets until the very last minute, so i have enjoyed the £8 i have spent

Don't be daft .Although if you feel you need a break you probably do, gambling can become easily out of control. I usually knock it on the head after cheltenham as i always get carried away, this year i have to be more prudent.

Yeah im on for just over £300, with a slightly embarressing lamby style stake

Todays bet is. Villa Palace v swans draw Spurs Madrids draw Bronby Galatasary Not looking great at the moment but only the odd goal in each match and a nice win.

Nice job, i didnt fancy that when you put it up. Shows what i know

Yeah i need a liverpool win to break even on the day, heres hoping.

Reading are a bunch of nobsacks, how the hell did that just happen

I went for it, damn reading. I almost swapped them for watford

Its got a draw written all over it, I reckon.

That's a cracking little bet to be fair, I am tempted myself.

I cant even be bothered to respond to that, i just dispair

In my defence vac, i was trying to understand why captain pancake face had such liberal veiws on paedophillia. so the he isnt a parent was about the only bone i could throw, to justify it (not that it helped). The debate had moved on to defining a 'paedo' so i did think my comments to you were fair based on the thread context at the time. No hard feelings, i dont think, or suggest you have sympathies to the subject.

My insinuations were regarding your snobby priorities, a parent wouldnt have stepped over a debate on paedophilia to score petty points, thus proving you incorrect.If you were a parent we wouldnt be having this debate as you would have agreed in the first instance.

Yes childless people can have a view, can you direct me to where I said they couldn't. When you become a parent many of your veiwpoints change, especially those of which concern children, hence the comment.Whether you like it or not, parents are more likely to speak up for the protection of children. The fact that out of the discussion taken place, the point you wish to highlight is this, gives me an insight into your position on child abuse.

I don't really want to go over old ground here but personally I find a 25 year old having sexual relations with a 16 year old almost as bad.In all honesty, in not particularly clued up to who John peel is but the same applies.

I am afraid i cannot abide his views on underage sex, i know he doesnt have children but they are far to liberal to be real.

Fùck them over or just fúck them? I know who gets my vote.

Nothing wrong with homosexuals, some of my favourite people like them.

Come over to the darkside, where we dont touch kids

That is beyond creepy, lets see if this gets blamed on smears

I was thinking about my comments earlier in this thread, I said I didn't believe Harman would have endorsed any such thing. I'm not sure i would have been so forgiving if it had been a man who had presided over it. Given what she stands for and everything, i think she should be treated equally.

I would imagine, its more the fact he does not think that image is a kin to paedophillia, just a cheap double smear effort that stinks of hypocrocy. You can defend HH without stooping to such lows imo.

If distributing such picture is a kin to paedophilia, what the hell are you doing posting such an image up on here. Then talk about hypocrocy?