Nalis

Why is Lady Di staring into my soul?

I was in a similar boat to you a few years ago so this is just my advice from my experience. Might not work for you but anyway..... I had in mind 2 or 3 different types of role I wanted to get into so I could focus my applications around those specifically, are you similar or is it more broad for you? If you've had loads of different roles within your current job, use that to your advantage and you can put utilise any of that experience in a CV. If there aspects of some you loved and are linked to the roles you are applying for stick quite a few bullet points about specifics of that, how you added value to the role and don't put in some of the bullet points that don't add value or that are irrelevant. Same for LinkedIn and put that you are open to work, but the one where it's only to recruiters, ie, not the green circle. You'd be surprised at the random contact - some relevant, some not. Have a master CV with loads of points of achievements. This will help massively for the rest of this post. Use that as a base to reduce it down to 2 pages for specific roles and job description - if 2 pages is industry standard for the industry you are in. You might want to tailor again to ensure points cover what the employer is looking for if you don't have it down already. If there are some points you don't have experience in, that's fine but change the order of bullet points so the key ones for that role are higher. Have a brief paragraph 'profile summary' at the top and tailor it for each role, just a 3-4 liner to cover overall experience linked with that role. I know all this sounds like work but it's worth it in the long run. Don't know where you are based but if you arent from North America, ignore the CV advise from US websites unless you are in sales, US CVs are very OTT. Final point - I'm repeating - to tailor your CV submission to the job spec, ie, what the employer is actually looking for. Sounds obvious but people tend to forget that. Good luck!

Haven't watched full games in this but has scrapping extra game made a positive or negative impact? People like Lineker bang on about scrapping it but I would get the impression the more defensive teams would sit back even earlier than normal, making the 2nd half of games practically unwatchable. I know a lot of it depends on the individual game but I'm genuinely interested.

Rio Ferdinand isn't just a crap pundit he has shit banter on top of it all.

How old was Spain's first scorer?

Agreed. There was a period of 5 minutes in the middle of the 2nd half when Spain sat back and you thought they were going to keep doing that painfully but they kept the ball well and got the rewards.

Nice try Yamal, your mate Rodri would have got away with it

Spain has won the gamesmanship, the react to the ref and theatrics Euros already

Forgot how deep Spain went towards the end of the Germany match when defending the lead. At risk doing the same thing again here.

Ngolo my boy

Not everything a keeper does is lucky Jermaine ffs

Ah, the Dean Smith tactic away to Newcastle. Only aim to score with the final chance of the game so the opposition can't even try to equalise.

Don't know why but I still have a feeling France will win this somehow.

The aerial view replay looking towards the goal for that Yamal goal is a thing of beauty

First time France have been losing, will be interesting to see how they react

Love Olmo, always seems to score when I see him play

Turnaround!!

Was not expecting 2 goals at this stage.

Striker!

Refs seem to be letting that go in recent years

Fair point

Fvck sake, France are going to win this aren't they?

Full of flair is a massive stretch. First decent attack by France and they score due to the Spain defence being asleep

Yawn..... even their open play goals are boring as fvck

Guess is the clash with Spain shorts