blabyboy

The problem with this article and many others is the 'when'. Give me the when! Otherwise, you may as well be a poster on FT 😂 I've been out of AI for a while and minimising my tech exposure as much as I can. Heck, I'm actually considering moving fully to bonds for a while 🤔

Average 3% dip on the markets today. Wonder how long Trump will run this before his friends ask him to stop

KS-KVS ?

Sniff, sniff.. do I smell the hint of a an ex-FT board member hereabouts... Sniff, sniff, sniff. Sounding a bit familiar to the same type of argument that we should not vote for changes. Need to change your AI prompt mate

About £400 millions

657 springs to mind from last night. It was down, especially over the last few months (one wonders why?!), so it will be interesting to see if it picks back up now that change is occurring.

They could do it online. They could also offer to meet at another (neutral) venue, which would be churlish of the club to refuse. The overall aim for any meeting is for progress and sharing of information, not for it to occur at a specific location, so if the club wants to show it is truly wanting to engage then not all meetings need to be at the stadium. As it's a 'community club', it wouldn't hurt to get out into it.

I could not believe that initially... wtf do they do in the club??

https://www.foxestalk.co.uk/topic/138309-foxes-trust-reform-the-final-step/page/4/#findComment-7971928 for context. Did anyone from the FT Board ask him why he did not go through the normal process? If someone did ask him, what was Bason's response please?

Ok. But can we see the proof of why they need to go please. Otherwise, we're just a lynch mob. It feels as if some posters in this thread have more information than has been publicly released and are making statements based on that information whilst forgetting that the vast majority of us do not have that information. Don't be like the club, don't be like the current FT board, show us that you're the better option and provide the receipts and let us judge for ourselves

Great. But did they offer an opinion?;.and what was it? .. and what points in the opinion are deemed not to be concrete or are irrelevant to the complaint? Without the complaint made, the consultation/opinion provided and then the objections to the provided opinion, we have no clue what's actually being said. Someone needs to start providing receipts.

That's exactly what I thought, and why I've asked the question.

From your email received today: "The ruling that he( Bason -my addition) did not break rules failed to provide concrete justification/evidence as to why not and included largely irrelevant justifications for the ruling." So, are us ordinary members allowed to see this ruling? And secondly, how do we know the justifications are not concrete? "We were also led to believe that the FSA had provided an opinion on the specific case but have since verified they did not." So whoever told you that the FSA had provided an opinion has lied? Who was the person that lied please? TIA

Where please? The accounts linked from here still show last year's (https://foxestrust.co.uk/documents)

Aye, thank you for the full reply. I suspect your are right in your guess. I appreciate you don't have all the answers.