Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

HankMarvin

Member
  • Posts

    15,850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by HankMarvin

  1. Whilst at it maybe they could line up Andrea Bocelli for the final home game of the season
  2. What a load of shit asking them to come back to a toxic environment. They deserve better, and before anyone says it’s for charity Top could just make a donation
  3. I don’t think it was as quite as simple as that. He wage was based on the fact that he had been here 10 plus years and what he had achieved. I very much doubt that he was willing to take the sort of salary he finally got offered at Cremonese here. The delay in getting a deal probably meant he was more desperate to accept by that point.
  4. Not to mention 50 games in league 2. Win percentages are pretty irrelevant for managers that have had long careers. Football moves on and managers that don’t adapt get found out. A bit like big Sam who has “good win percentages”
  5. Got an assist in the second game he played as an attacking midfielder only made 4 starts all season and 2 of those are listed as DM. Shocking he hasn’t been utilised more when you consider players like Skip has no assists Winks has 2 Mavididi 2
  6. If the aim was to try to avoid relegation and give more game time to the younger players he would’ve been better than his replacement. At the time of his sacking they was still thinking about promotion and the playoffs 🤣 A competent board might have had something lined up as opposed to first try someone that didn’t want the Job, before ending up with a candidate sacked from relegation threatened team 12 points worse off and 3rd from bottom at the time of his sacking.
  7. Yet people don’t take into account selling their two best players for £60m plus
  8. And that’s benefited us how? He has won 25 percent of the games the sacked manager won over the same period. The fact of the matter is the longer he has with us the worse we have got. 3 points from the last 6 against teams all in the lower half of the table.
  9. Made it into the sun
  10. Rowett has managed 2 teams down the bottom their records under his management are near identical, Oxford have improved in his absence I think that highlights short comings in his management skills. Something we have seen first hand. Rigid, stubborn and one dimensional. Martis football was often dogshit but he got results, if we knew what was coming how many would’ve pulled the trigger.
  11. At some point over 30 odd games you make your own luck, it’s quite the sample size. No luck for Garry over 11 then?
  12. Apart from wins against Ipswich, Derby x2 and WBA before he was sacked, in the same amount of time his replacement has one solitary win in what was being creamed over by many as the easiest run in
  13. You can only go on their respective records, Marti was capable of winning games and scoring 3 goals in a game. Rowett also had the benefit of the additional players signed late in the window. Based on their points per game and goals per match they are worlds apart.
  14. If by getting a tune you mean not winning one in 11 look at the last professional manager.
  15. No words of wisdom full stop. yes the players are underperforming and confidence is low. But what exactly are you doing through the week? Basically the team picks itself based on experience (your choice) and the formation has been the same through 11 games. Goal scoring will be down 50% if they have another stinker, that’s a Rowett problem
  16. .82 but still a shit c¥nt
  17. Which is exacerbated by a limited manager. ”but the squad is shit” A sentiment echoed around the The Hawthorns under Ramsey. Or Norwich Or Sheffield united Or Southampton under still or Oxford under Rowett
  18. Doesn’t really matter how many he loses if he can’t win 8 points from 33
  19. Southampton relegated in a multiverse.
  20. On the plus at least we are still breaking records 10 years later
  21. Just not where it matters Goals per game down 40% and points per game down 38%
  22. 0.9 goals a game scored just what you need when facing relegation.
  23. For those leaving lets be honest why would any one of them give a shit about the club. Some have been alienated then brought back in. It’s the perfect storm of toxicity a whole host of players leaving. They should be ****ed off now
  24. They way you speak about them it’s amazing they was 4th after 10 games in October and 14th when Marti was sacked. its like they have never been capable of winning a game
×
×
  • Create New...