Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

HankMarvin

Member
  • Posts

    15,889
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by HankMarvin

  1. Our squad worth £70m on transfermarket now, the time Faes, VK, Fatawu, Souter leave it will be worth about £30m Shocking fall from grace
  2. We should learn our lesson and any players that are not happy should be sold, if it’s true he isn’t content
  3. Italian club expiring contract won’t sign another probably offering 3m
  4. Would block the pathway of young and talented strikers like ings coming through
  5. And Gray on loan from Leeds
  6. Fans probably said that at Sheffield united, and fans said it about Daka and nacho dropping divisions
  7. If he was on just 30k a week that’s 1.6m he could earn so maybe offered 800k to 1m thats shit business that we can’t offload him for a low fee to save the above
  8. Charlie Austin was busy building houses again
  9. Not so great having to pay up his contract/settlement though
  10. Someone who scores goals Our 2 former shit bags scored more in a relegated team
  11. Because no one wants shit players on high wages, hence having to pay up Vesterguard contract
  12. How old is Jannicks Dog? Ings will be happy to see it
  13. Worse record than Daka the last 2 seasons He was on 30k at Sheffield U 125k West Ham so we probably offered 50k 🤣
  14. I think I alluded to that by showing Bradfords spending over the last 20 years and the fees involved, it would only be deemed as good business if it was a (realistic) decent fee. Or If he would’ve have been surplus to requirements here because we end up having either adequate replacements within the squad or newly brought it in. Or he ends up being shit and it’s all irrelevant
  15. What’s to say it’s good business? A random poster on a Bradford forum suggesting the fee? Bradford have a business model since administration and in the last 25 odd years have spent £250k once. Their money is historically spent on agent fees and hovering up free transfers this includes time in the championship and after selling players. So it’s seems unlikely that they would all of a sudden spend 10 to 20 times more than they have spent in the last 9 seasons on one player.
  16. So with no new faces in how do you know he could not have been used this season? the fee received for a young player is so paltry it probably covered Aribos loan period for a few weeks.
  17. Bradford have spent 25k on transfers since 18/19.
  18. It’s dynamic real time reporting, not a one off. We must be sustainable throughout the whole season.
  19. I hate to say it but because a player is not deemed good enough when you’re a prem team or even championship doesn’t mean he is surplus to requirements when you’re playing the likes of Bromley.
  20. Or the fact that there is a 65 percent salary wage cap (which include coaches and manager) related to limited turnover
  21. That would depend on the value 100 percent of 500k is **** all in terms of money in
  22. Doesn’t help when the manager wants him and thinks he will sign even in Jan 23 Brendan Rodgers, the Leicester manager, is confident - publicly at least - that Tielemans can still be persuaded to stay, and is not for sale in January.
  23. What would you suggest? Gun point negotiations? Its well documented that negotiations took part for over 2 and a half years
  24. Be a pleasant surprise to see some new players coming n rather than see **** all every day
×
×
  • Create New...