HankMarvin

They had a good start there form has been worse that our over the last 6 and just 2 more points in the last 10

He might be shit at defending but he has the joint second assists and joint second big chances created in this wank team

We are actually above them over the last 6 and 2 points behind over the last 10 and that’s considering how shit we are and have been it’s definitely the right time to play them

Sniff loads of coke and shags loads of different younger blokes. Top mum

You are all enjoying him playing shit, but shouldn’t we hoping he plays well so we see the back of the useless mop haired *****

Someone capable of scoring at this level would be nice, but I guess it will depends on the finances or if we have any

Wasn’t exactly spending when they had a sponsor, so wouldn’t get your hopes up

And dodgy sponsorship deals

Nope definitely not tried to find “loopholes” 👀 “Leicester City will pay the Football League £3.1m after settling a Financial Fair Play (FFP) disputefrom the 2013/14 season when the club won the Championship. The Foxes exceeded the permitted £8m loss when they won promotion. They posted a loss of £20.8m but said £13m of it was "allowable" as it included promotion and academy costs. The EFL said, external that Leicester "did not make any deliberate attempt to infringe the rules or to deceive". It added: "The dispute arose out of genuine differences of interpretation of the rules between the parties” A familiar defence, there was also the shady Trestellar deal, which allowed the club to spend £36m on wages. £5m more than their total income before getting promoted

He says had, past tense and is there any reason why you think that a player that had publicly stated he wanted to leave twice before, would want to play in the championship a league he made it clear he didn’t want to play in previously, would delay it.

That wasn’t the issue, as the business model allowed one significant expensive player to be sold year after year. The problem is when the market becomes more and more competitive the harder it is to find these players unless you adapt. It all goes hand in hand the more successful you are, the more the good players are desired and the higher fees you can get. We didn’t have a slow slip off like most clubs flirting with relegation for a few seasons. 5th 5th 8th 18th it was the perfect storm for a club living beyond its means

I guess it’s how creative you can get now days. Villa with a similar wages to turnover ratio as we had, sell the women’s team to a parent company nothing to see there. The player swaps a while back, nothing to see there. Player 'swaps' can be mutually beneficial for two or more clubs who need to make a quick profit." Maguire lays out a hypothetical scenario in which 'Club A’ has a former academy player who it would normally look to sell for £8m, while 'Club B' has a former academy player it would usually value at £10m. "However, if a swap deal is made there is nothing to stop the 'official' price to be £28m and £30m," explains Maguire. "This way there is still a cash settlement of £2m, but the profits in the accounts are £28m and £30m - fantastic for PSR. The additional cost of signing both players is then spread using amortisation over the contract life of five years, so is effectively kicked down the road. "Given that it is so difficult to determine the market price for a player, the swap market can be seen as exploiting a weakness in the rules, but is not necessarily breaching anything."

He didn’t start the first four games we got 9/12 The next 9 he started 10/27

I was alluding to the point of the manager saying he was eager to go to a good club.

Makes it awkward when he comes back after Monaco have realised he is dog shit and don’t want him.

I didn’t mean by looks I meant by the cartoon filter smoothing, ok crack on keep uploading

Not sure it’s 80s I think they call it a Katie Price special. Probably best to move on Helen.

On a side note just saw this pop up

Not long as there are only 2 parachute payments should we stay in the league. So if the cash is utilised prematurely, and not for the second season then there will have to be another substantial source of income to assist in the 2nd season.

Not seen you post for a while.

I had already edited the previous post, I saw there was a rule change to stop the “gaming of the system” 👍🏻

I think it drops every year, Parachute payments Given to clubs relegated from the Premier League in the last three years (and not promoted in that period) 55% of equal share in Year One 45% in Year 2 20% in Year 3 Edit, no you’re correct there was a rule change in 2016/17 to stop clubs gaming the system

45% of the stake wouldn’t be that much, but if Terraloon is correct and he seems fairly well versed in these matters it’s being potentially used to aid cash flow for some reason.

What about if they do the same thing again next season? And utilise the 20 percent early if we are still a championship side in the hope that by then overheads have massively reduced and we are much more inline with championship financials by season 3

Or a shit or bust approach this season by utilising the second parachute payment and either spend or limit breaches this season