Ash Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 Pressman - 7 Makin - 6 Stewart- 5 Dabizas - 6 Heath - 6 Tiatto - 7 Gudjonsson - 7 Williams - 8* Scowcroft - 6 Wright - 5 Blake - 4 Subs : Elliott - 7 Wilcox - 6 Gillespie - 6
Mark Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 Pressman - 7 Makin - 4 Stewart- 5 Dabizas - 4 Heath - 6 Tiatto - 8 Gudjonsson - 7 Williams - 5 Scowcroft - 4 Wright - 4 Blake - 5 Subs : Elliott - 6 Wilcox - 3 Gillespie - 6
Scow Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 Pressman 7 Makin 5 Dabizas 4 Heath 4 Stewart 4 Scowcroft 5 Williams 5 Gudjonsson 5 Tiatto 7 Wright 4 Blake 5 Subs: Elliott 7 Gillespie 5 Wilcox 5
Ash Posted 5 October 2004 Author Posted 5 October 2004 I thought Williams played well , won us the penalty,Got in good attackting postions ,passed the ball around well ! Williams & Joey have a good connection in the centre
spirefox Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 Pressman 6 Makin 5 Dabizas 5 Heath 5 Stewart 5 Scowcroft 7 Gud'jons'n7 Williams 6 Tiatto 6 Blake 7 Wright 5 SUBS Elliott 6 Wilcox 6 Gillespie 7 Wright proved he's not up to it,Blake best game by far,Gillespie can beat a man!
Bluefoxtim Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 Pressman 6 Makin 5 Dabizas 5 Heath 5 Stewart 5 Scowcroft 7 Gud'jons'n7 Williams 8* Tiatto 7 Blake 6 Wright 5 SUBS Elliott 7 Wilcox 6 Gillespie 5 WHERE IS NALIS?
Cat Burger Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 Pressman 6 - Can't blame him for the goals but you'd expect a better keeper to have stopped at least 1 of them. Makin 6 - The only member of the starting backline that deserves any credit. Dabizas 4 - Was complete toss to be honest, suprised he didn't get a boo when he came off. Heath 5 - Good in the air, but totally shocking when picking players up. Stewart (bambi on ice) 2 - Total ****ing shit, he's crap and even when he does something good it looks rubbish because 'he did it'. I wish he'd leave. Tiatto 7 - As you'd expect from Tiatto (A.K.A Thug4life) as me and me mates call him. Gudjonsson 7* - Was everywhere, great tackling and pace, shouldn't have been on the losing side! Hit a stinging volley which went close. Williams 7 - Played it around well when he had it, dangerous, I've just realised how hard it is for him to find the ball when the defence lump it up. Deserves credit. Scowcroft 6 - Did pretty much nothing, but didn't play badly. Blake 7 - Played really well, great header, good spirit. Wore himself out though. Wright 5 - Fell over all the time he was on and fouled the defenders - that's it. Subs Elliott 6 - alot better than dabizas when he came on. Gillespie 6 - did really well I thought, difficult to come off the bench into that position. Wilcox 6 - can't give him a bad mark, what he did he did well
Scow Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 I thought Williams played well , won us the penalty,Got in good attackting postions ,passed the ball around well !Williams & Joey have a good connection in the centre 24471[/snapback] Williams was anonymous for large parts of the game. He did show some promise, but he doesn't do it often enough.
Teeno Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 I thought Williams played well , won us the penalty,Got in good attackting postions ,passed the ball around well !Williams & Joey have a good connection in the centre 24471[/snapback] You having a laugh? 3 out of the 4 games we have won Nalis has started. He is our best player so 1 of them has to be dropped, favourably Williams.
Buzzell Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 I thought Williams played well 24471[/snapback] You always do as he's ya favorite player!
Ash Posted 5 October 2004 Author Posted 5 October 2004 I would play all 3 Nalis,Williams & Gudjonsson
Ash Posted 5 October 2004 Author Posted 5 October 2004 Nalis does deserve to play, as he is playing good ! But so do Williams & Joey
Guest Daniel Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 I think Williams is junk and Joey aint alot better. Nalis for sure.
Guest Daniel Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 He is awful, he's been our worst signing, we actually paid for that shit, at least the others are for free.
Ash Posted 5 October 2004 Author Posted 5 October 2004 Williams will come good , When we get a new manager TRUST
Guest Daniel Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 yah he might come good and i hope he does, but what i said is so far hes shit and its true, he hasnt done anything to deserve a start.
Ash Posted 5 October 2004 Author Posted 5 October 2004 He plays because the potential is there , Same as Connolly..Both will become hopefully great players for us , Time will tell i guess !
Guest Daniel Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 To be fair we aint a good enouh club to bring the best out in them. My mates a Forest fan and told me how lucky we are to have him and etc, well at the moment they can have him back, he cant believe he aint performing. Can only be the way he's being trained.
Anish Posted 5 October 2004 Posted 5 October 2004 He plays because the potential is there , Same as Connolly..Both will become hopefully great players for us , Time will tell i guess ! 24563[/snapback] Williams and Connolly play because MA just recently bought them (for more than £1million combined) and we all know Micky is stubborn when it comes to HIS signings. He has to play them to prove that they are good signings, even if they are playing shite.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.