Fez of Mahrez Posted 16 October 2006 Author Posted 16 October 2006 Sell em all. Buy some more - at least you'll prove that its our midfield that's starving the strikers. It was no different Saturday either. Oh you're no fun! I wanted a lecture about Dodds! If we had a decent midfield Fryatt and Hume could get 35 goals between them in my opinion. Even if they were all playing all season, can't see those sort of figures from Hammond or O'Grady. More like 6 or 7 each at the most.
Cobbo Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 I think they're both assets at this level. Technically however, O'Grady is far superior and if asked who would I keep if I had to seel one I would say COG.
newms Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 you have to ask the question if you were a centre back who would you least like to play against? The answer everytime would be Hammond as although he is a rubbish footballer defenders hate playing against pace
Cobbo Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 you have to ask the question if you were a centre back who would you least like to play against? The answer everytime would be Hammond as although he is a rubbish footballer defenders hate playing against pace Playing against an awkward 6ft 3 brick shit house can be aekward too. Not that COG is slow either.
lildave3 Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 O'Grady. Just watching him in the warm-up trying to finish a couple makes me laugh
newms Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 Playing against an awkward 6ft 3 brick shit house can be aekward too. Not that COG is slow either. you sure hes 6ft 3 because he doesnt look it, i'd be surprised if he was over 6 foot which is bread and butter for most the centre backs in the championship
Cobbo Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 you sure hes 6ft 3 because he doesnt look it, i'd be surprised if he was over 6 foot which is bread and butter for most the centre backs in the championship Yer wah?
Cobbo Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 http://www.lcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Match...4~23709,00.html
newms Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 Yer wah? hes not 6ft 3 and hes only got average pace
ScrumpyFox Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 you sure hes 6ft 3 because he doesnt look it, i'd be surprised if he was over 6 foot which is bread and butter for most the centre backs in the championship hes definately a brick shit house though, a friend of mine played with him at rushden and said that he is a unit!!! weve had elvis for a while and im still waiting for him to come to life so im gonna say him
Cobbo Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 http://www.lcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Match...4~23709,00.html hes not 6ft 3 and hes only got average pace I refer you to the above link.
newms Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 I refer you to the above link. funny in his yahoo profile it says hes 6ft. If hes 6 ft 3 them Mark de Vries must be taller than Peter Crouch
newms Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 I refer you to the above link. funny in his yahoo profile it says hes 6ft. If hes 6 ft 3 them Mark de Vries must be taller than Peter Crouch refer you to here and here Its clear that the OS often lies
Cobbo Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 funny in his yahoo profile it says hes 6ft. If hes 6 ft 3 them Mark de Vries must be taller than Peter Crouch refer you to here and here Its clear that the OS often lies The OS lie about the height and weight of players? Is that a propoganda stunt?
newms Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 i've checked about 6 other sites and none say he is as tall as 6 ft 3, he doesnt look 6ft 3 either. He isnt 6ft 3 give it up
Cobbo Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 i've checked about 6 other sites and none say he is as tall as 6 ft 3, he doesnt look 6ft 3 either. He isnt 6ft 3 give it up http://www.lcfc.premiumtv.co.uk//javaImage...~2952977,00.jpg Tiny.
lookwhaticando Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 The numbers don't lie. Goals this season. Elvis Hammond: has scored goals in the league. Chris O'Grady: hasn't scored goals in the leage. Says it all really.
AyewJoking Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 Both struggling but at least Hammond scores once in a while.
lookwhaticando Posted 16 October 2006 Posted 16 October 2006 Both struggling but at least Hammond scores once in a while. .. and he often manages to put the ball in the back of the net from time to time. As for O'Grady, I think the afro hampered his attempts to score.
Thracian Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 The numbers don't lie. Goals this season. Elvis Hammond: has scored goals in the league. Chris O'Grady: hasn't scored goals in the leage. Says it all really.
Joe. Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 You have to admit though, O'Grady does have years on his side...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 17 October 2006 Author Posted 17 October 2006 I thought this was going to be closer. I think Elvis would have won this before the Birmingham game.
lcfc_jme Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 I'd have to go COG really. He has youth on his side and so he should get better and improve with age, but that doesn't excuse him from going down pretty easily for a big lad and generally not doing too much. At least Elvis, albeit rubbish with the ball, doesn't stop running and actually scares opposition defenders
.png.0e7438f54a80a2f2566907f77fd7a32a.thumb.png.0ea5e31693d284629c473304eabd4568.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.