Head Honcho Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 I wasn't at the games but listened to them both and the one thing that was evident in both games was that we didn't seem to have a clue! Anyone who attended the games feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but it seemed we were running around like headless chickens and OK you can blame the players but the majority of the blame surely has to go to Kelly. He may well be a good coach but manager forget it! 31% possession at home says it all methinks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROSSINDA Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 I wasn't at the games but listened to them both and the one thing that was evident in both games was that we didn't seem to have a clue! Anyone who attended the games feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but it seemed we were running around like headless chickens and OK you can blame the players but the majority of the blame surely has to go to Kelly. He may well be a good coach but manager forget it! 31% possession at home says it all methinks Yep we are clueless. CRAP team selection, CRAP/non existent tactics, no passion and fight at all. We also went back to a mid field that created nothing. Far too many changes, and will Rob wake up and smell the coffee and realise the Hughes IS NOT A RIGHT WINGER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertine Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 How is he a good coach? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandannieldanok Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 How is he a good coach? That what I ask. It is unbelieveable that people say he may be a good assistant. Kelly is a poor, negative-minded coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe. Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 Yep we are clueless. CRAP team selection, CRAP/non existent tactics, no passion and fight at all. We also went back to a mid field that created nothing. Far too many changes, and will Rob wake up and smell the coffee and realise the Hughes IS NOT A RIGHT WINGER I don't want to keep defending kelly but Hughes is only a makeshift right winger. We are tight for right wingers at the moment and nobody is good enough to fit that bill. At least he was making changes from an awful performace at Southampton. I actually applaud him for that. I know it sounds stupid but at least he's trying ideas. Why not do it? Nothing else seems to work. The players need to be looked at. Everyone seems to think that kelly is all to blame for every loss that occurs. A lot of the mistakes today were from individual players who just insisted on giving the ball away. Sunderland were good, we were not. Southampton were very good, we were terrible. We've just played two decent teams who are bound to be up and around there come end of season. Did you really expect to get positive results against them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mort Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 How is he a good coach? Coz folks desperatly want somthing good to say about him coz he seems like a nice guy... fact is that all he is, wouldnt mind him managing a reserve team but he's out of his depth as City manager and that's obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandannieldanok Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 We've just played two decent teams who are bound to be up and around there come end of season. Did you really expect to get positive results against them? That's not necessarily the point. Maybe if we had given them a run for their money and really attacked them and lost we may be more sympathetic towards Kelly. The fact that the team has failed to muster one shot on target in 180 minutes of football is appalling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommeh Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 We were dreadful today against a sunderland side who were nothing special. The support and atmosphere was imbarrasing and we looking like the same as last year under Levien, couple of good results and everyone thinks everything is fine. IT ISN'T!! Milan is now our only hope, happy new year everyone. Shame it started with a shower of shit at the walkers today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BartonFox Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 That what I ask. It is unbelieveable that people say he may be a good assistant. Kelly is a poor, negative-minded coach. He is f'ckn rubbish and has been part of our decline for 3 years, no coincidence. Nice guy or not, I don't give a toss when it comes the the welfare of the Club I support, he can get to f'ck and never darken our door again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandannieldanok Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 He is f'ckn rubbish and has been part of our decline for 3 years, no coincidence. Nice guy or not, I don't give a toss when it comes the the welfare of the Club I support, he can get to f'ck and never darken our door again. Agreed, we need a real twat in charge who will basically threaten them into getting results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brummie-FOX Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 Yeah, but still, 0/6 points, welcome to Leicester City Football Club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Honcho Posted 1 January 2007 Author Share Posted 1 January 2007 How is he a good coach? I said "he may well be" !! How do you measure if someone is a good coach or not? He's always been in work so he can't be that shite! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brummie-FOX Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 Agreed, we need a real twat in charge who will basically threaten them into getting results. David O' Learys available Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gist Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 So much for that play off push that some people on here thought we were capable of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandannieldanok Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 I said "he may well be" !! How do you measure if someone is a good coach or not? He's always been in work so he can't be that shite! Results of the club and progression of the club's academy determine whether a coach is good or not. And it does not matter whether you have been in the game a while, there is always some fool ready to employ you if you posess the hallowed qualification paper from the FA that bascally says you have helped people kick a ball around a cone. Look at Peter Taylor, he is still managing in the scond division! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brummie-FOX Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 Everytime we go on a 2 match winning streak I think.. Wow, 2-3 more wins on the trot and we're in the mix! Now im thinking ' Ok, lets stop thinking that everytime we do well and just concentrate on sealing 21st place ' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynny Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 Results of the club and progression of the club's academy determine whether a coach is good or not. And it does not matter whether you have been in the game a while, there is always some fool ready to employ you if you posess the hallowed qualification paper from the FA that bascally says you have helped people kick a ball around a cone. Look at Peter Taylor, he is still managing in the scond division! I know it's blasphemous to say so around these parts, but Taylor did a good job with Hull and a bad (okay, fooking awful, but still) period as a manager doesn't make a person a bad manager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcfc_jme Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 Clueless? That was fooking worse than clueless. I was under the impression that we were supposed to be the home team and Kelly wanted to make amends for the shockingly poor performance we gave on Saturday. He didn't. We failed miserably. Sunderland were not and are not a brilliant side. However, for a neutral looking at the stats/watching the game, they'd think Sunderland were probably a Premiership side. Absolutely fooking abysmal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 I wasn't at the games but listened to them both and the one thing that was evident in both games was that we didn't seem to have a clue! Anyone who attended the games feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but it seemed we were running around like headless chickens and OK you can blame the players but the majority of the blame surely has to go to Kelly. He may well be a good coach but manager forget it! 31% possession at home says it all methinks If Kelly is such a good coach why does our team play as if they've never been coached? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynny Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 If Kelly is such a good coach why does our team play as if they've never been coached? Paperwork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 Paperwork. Well he must be obliterating all his best ideas when he wipes his arse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simi Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 In my opinon it showed alot today before kick off when Sunderland had a huddle and our team stayed still and looked on. Kisnorbo hands on hips not looking interseted just little things like that makes me think that morale is getting constantly lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fosseman Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 We were outplayed and outrun. It was awful. Why does our midfield keep passing the ball back (and behind)? We had nothing to offer. Our players were too often beaten to the ball. On the positive side, I thought Henderson was excellent and Cadamarteri looked as if he could be more useful than Low. Happy New Year! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynny Posted 1 January 2007 Share Posted 1 January 2007 Cadamarteri looked as if he could be more useful than Low. To be fair he could have played one of the ballboys and achieved the same net effect there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.