shen Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Walker - 7Maybury - 7 Dabizas - 6.5 Dublin - 6.5 Stewart - 7 Gillespie - 7 Hughes - 7 Williams - 6.5 Gudjonsson - 6.5 Tiatto - 7 de Vries - 6.5 Subs: Nalis - 6 Connolly - 6 69398[/snapback] Haha, I dared not say it, but I was waiting for 'Harsh Lisa' to vote! And you didn't disappoint
Ric Flair Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Walker - 7Maybury - 7 Dabizas - 6.5 Dublin - 6.5 Stewart - 7 Gillespie - 7 Hughes - 7 Williams - 6.5 Gudjonsson - 6.5 Tiatto - 7 de Vries - 6.5 Subs: Nalis - 6 Connolly - 6 69398[/snapback] Pfft. I would love to see what a player has got to do in a match to get above a '7' granted there has been some generous ratings, but there is a reason for that. They played well against a premiership team away from home! Let's hope we find a new Pele for Lisa's sake.
Scow Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Walker 7 Maybury 6 Dabizas 8 Dublin 8 Stewart 7 Gillespie 8 Hughes 7 Gudjonsson 8 Williams 7 Tiatto 9 de Vries 8 Subs: Nalis 6 Connolly 5
Guest Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Pfft. I would love to see what a player has got to do in a match to get above a '7' granted there has been some generous ratings, but there is a reason for that. They played well against a premiership team away from home!Let's hope we find a new Pele for Lisa's sake. 69414[/snapback] I'm sorry, am I not allowed an opinion these days?
Ric Flair Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Pfft. I would love to see what a player has got to do in a match to get above a '7' granted there has been some generous ratings, but there is a reason for that. They played well against a premiership team away from home!Let's hope we find a new Pele for Lisa's sake. 69414[/snapback] I'm sorry, am I not allowed an opinion these days? 69443[/snapback] Absolutely not.
Guest Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Pfft. I would love to see what a player has got to do in a match to get above a '7' granted there has been some generous ratings, but there is a reason for that. They played well against a premiership team away from home!Let's hope we find a new Pele for Lisa's sake. 69414[/snapback] I'm sorry, am I not allowed an opinion these days? 69443[/snapback] Absolutely not. 69446[/snapback] Now we've got that sorted, who wants to do my ratings for me on Wednesday? Obviously I can't choose who does this, so if someone would like to volunteer to choose my ratings picker..............
Chandler Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Lisa's ratings are probably closer to the mark than most but they are all in a narrow band of 0.5 of a point. I noticed some wider differences in performance than that. But it is entirely subjective at the end of the day. It must be remembered though that this is a one off cup tie and players are either 'up for t'cup' or not. Players either psyche themselves up for it or they bottle it. In a straight win or lose situation management rarely has anything to do it with it - unless the manager in question has rare powers (and Levein certainly hasn't got these - he wouldn't be with us if he had). It's worth noting that not a single lower league team went out to Premiership opposition in the fifth round. Does that make all their managers 'great motivators?' If it does then what does that make Sourpuss Souness?
davieG Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Lisa's ratings are probably closer to the mark than most but they are all in a narrow band of 0.5 of a point. I noticed some wider differences in performance than that. But it is entirely subjective at the end of the day.It must be remembered though that this is a one off cup tie and players are either 'up for t'cup' or not. Players either psyche themselves up for it or they bottle it. In a straight win or lose situation management rarely has anything to do it with it - unless the manager in question has rare powers (and Levein certainly hasn't got these - he wouldn't be with us if he had). It's worth noting that not a single lower league team went out to Premiership opposition in the fifth round. Does that make all their managers 'great motivators?' If it does then what does that make Sourpuss Souness? 69580[/snapback] A Sourpuss , good description, sums him up without being 'too rude' or offensive I'll borrow that next time I mention him if you don't mind Chandler
Chandler Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 That makes two people who have been nice to me today. Ordinarily I would think that I must be saying something wrong. Must be 'Cup Fever.' Once a very common disease (particulalry round these parts) now virtually eradicated in the Western world thanks to the Champions League vaccine.
Guest Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Lisa's ratings are probably closer to the mark than most but they are all in a narrow band of 0.5 of a point. I noticed some wider differences in performance than that. But it is entirely subjective at the end of the day. 69580[/snapback] I thought that the team performance, as a whole, was good, and didn't think anyone particular stood out as being particularly good or bad. My scores reflected the fact that I still think we can play better. Fantastic as the result was, I don't want it to cloud my judgement, and if we were to play fantastically well, how can I score the players if a performance like Saturday's is full of 8's and 9's?
BartonFox Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Walker - 7 - good save from Hughes and that was about it. Maybury - 6 - Sloppy for the goal and Thomas gave him a bit of a torrid time. Dublin - 7 - Used his experience well and scored Dabizas - 6.5 - Scored and could of had another but was sloppy for their goal. Stewart - 6.5 - Nothing wrong and nothing spectacular. Gillespie - 8 - Could of had a couple of goals, squared up to Hermann but helped Maybury out tremendously against Thomas. Hughes - 7 - Energietic and dynamic. Gudjohnsson - 8 - One of his best games for us. Williams - 7 - See Hughes. Tiatto - 9 - The player we hoped we were getting when MA signed him up. de Vries - 8.5 - Purely for taking the workload on the chin and running himself int the ground for the cause. Subs - 6 a piece. A terrific performance and one form which we should be able to build some serious momentum into next season. It'll be interesting to see who Levein can add before the next round as the prospect of Dickov/Gallacher or Stead against our double "D's" is a bit scarey.
Chandler Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Lisa's ratings are probably closer to the mark than most but they are all in a narrow band of 0.5 of a point. I noticed some wider differences in performance than that. But it is entirely subjective at the end of the day. 69580[/snapback] I thought that the team performance, as a whole, was good, and didn't think anyone particular stood out as being particularly good or bad. My scores reflected the fact that I still think we can play better. Fantastic as the result was, I don't want it to cloud my judgement, and if we were to play fantastically well, how can I score the players if a performance like Saturday's is full of 8's and 9's? 69598[/snapback] Lisa, You are beginning to worry me. You're beginning to sound too rational, particularly for a GIRLIE. You're supposed to be unreasonable and come over all emotional like. Like the rest of the girls on here...
davieG Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 Lisa's ratings are probably closer to the mark than most but they are all in a narrow band of 0.5 of a point. I noticed some wider differences in performance than that. But it is entirely subjective at the end of the day. 69580[/snapback] I thought that the team performance, as a whole, was good, and didn't think anyone particular stood out as being particularly good or bad. My scores reflected the fact that I still think we can play better. Fantastic as the result was, I don't want it to cloud my judgement, and if we were to play fantastically well, how can I score the players if a performance like Saturday's is full of 8's and 9's? 69598[/snapback] Lisa, You are beginning to worry me. You're beginning to sound too rational, particularly for a GIRLIE. You're supposed to be unreasonable and come over all emotional like. Like the rest of the girls on here... 69612[/snapback] Duck everyone I can see the proverbials hitting the fan, Louise, Katy, Rachel, kerryH, emmalcfc and even Chandlers Wife are a coming
Chandler Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 ...another bonehead misses the ironic use of the word 'girl.'
davieG Posted 21 February 2005 Posted 21 February 2005 ...another bonehead misses the ironic use of the word 'girl.' 69686[/snapback] And of course you're the only clever dick on here Chandler
MADLEVEIN Posted 22 February 2005 Posted 22 February 2005 walker 8 maybury7 dabizas 8 dublin 9 Stewart 7 Gillespie 7 Hughes 8 Gudjohnsson 8 Williams 7 Tiatto 9* de Vries 8 nalis 7 connolly 6 great result great day out best team performance since oneil days.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.