Joe. Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cambrid...ire/6993216.stmI don't see what is so wrong bout it. As if a 14 year old won't have seen something like it before. It's not like he sexually assaulted the lad. What if the same image was sent to him by one of his mates at school? It's not THAT bad tbf. Although I don't know what the image was... if it was an image of him then that is just dirty and perverted. If it's been posted before then I've not seen it but oh well How is it not wrong? You really are an arse.
DB11 Posted 15 September 2007 Author Posted 15 September 2007 You seem to be missing the point.He got sexual gratification from doing so. That is he was sexually aroused by sending images to a 14 year old boy. Maybe he's liking the thought of the boy getting excited by these images, if you catch my drift. Either way it's just not cricket. Ok that explains it better. He should be punished then
Ultra Posted 16 September 2007 Posted 16 September 2007 He has been on the Football League referees' list for three years and can officiate at Championship, League One and League Two games. Now why does that not surprise me? We all know most league refs are the dregs, but this is ridiculous!
Finnegan Posted 16 September 2007 Posted 16 September 2007 Now why does that not surprise me? We all know most league refs are the dregs, but this is ridiculous! er. what?
stez Posted 16 September 2007 Posted 16 September 2007 er. what? haven't you seen the nonces wings? they're full of lower league referees....
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.