DB11 Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cambrid...ire/6993216.stm I don't see what is so wrong bout it. As if a 14 year old won't have seen something like it before. It's not like he sexually assaulted the lad. What if the same image was sent to him by one of his mates at school? It's not THAT bad tbf. Although I don't know what the image was... if it was an image of him then that is just dirty and perverted. If it's been posted before then I've not seen it but oh well
Webbo Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cambrid...ire/6993216.stmI don't see what is so wrong bout it. 'Sexual gratification' Prosecutor Angela Sassoli told magistrates Lewis exchanged MSN internet messages with the boy over a number of weeks this summer and at this time the indecent images were sent. Lewis admitted gaining "sexual gratification" by sending the images to the youngsters, Mrs Sassoli said. Mr Haselhurst, his lawyer, told the court Lewis would never teach again. "His career as far as teaching is concerned is at an end. He will never be able to teach again." Magistrates asked for reports about Lewis's background and said a Crown Court judge should impose a sentence. Lewis left court without comment.
DB11 Posted 15 September 2007 Author Posted 15 September 2007 Well it doesn't imply that the image was of him now does it?
Libertine Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 Well it doesn't imply that the image was of him now does it? So?
James. Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 Well it doesn't imply that the image was of him now does it? He admitted gaining "sexual gratification" by sending the images to the youngsters... Are you saying that is ok? Do you understand? Why am I even trying?
DB11 Posted 15 September 2007 Author Posted 15 September 2007 So? So it's not like a 14 year old would never have seen it before - whatever the image was. He admitted gaining "sexual gratification" by sending the images to the youngsters... Are you saying that is ok? Do you understand? Why am I even trying? No I don't understand. What is sexual gratification?
James. Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 So it's not like a 14 year old would never have seen it before - whatever the image was. No I don't understand. What is sexual gratification? Satisfaction and pleasure of a sexual nature. Do you see?
Webbo Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 No I don't understand. What is sexual gratification? Come off it, you're obviously quite bright. This thick act is wearing a bit thin now.
James. Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 Come off it, you're obviously quite bright. This thick act is wearing a bit thin now. I gave him the benefit of the doubt. i.e. I thought he really WAS an idiot, instead of just pretending to be one. Maybe there's no difference either way.
Guest Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 I don't see what is so wrong bout it. Are you trying to provoke a reaction?
Steven Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 So it's not like a 14 year old would never have seen it before - whatever the image was. No I don't understand. What is sexual gratification? He is getting his nuts off over sending a porno picture to a fourteen year old boy. It could be you.
OriginalRobboFOX Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cambrid...ire/6993216.stmI don't see what is so wrong bout it. As if a 14 year old won't have seen something like it before. It's not like he sexually assaulted the lad. What if the same image was sent to him by one of his mates at school? It's not THAT bad tbf. Although I don't know what the image was... if it was an image of him then that is just dirty and perverted. If it's been posted before then I've not seen it but oh well WTF!!
Manwell Pablo Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 He is getting his nuts off over sending a porno picture to a fourteen year old boy. It could be you. He probabley wants to be sent porno pictures, hence his reaction.
potter3 Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 Danny isn't 14. Yes he is he's in my brother year
Brainy Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 Yes he is he's in my brother year Is he as thick as he acts on here?
Bert Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cambrid...ire/6993216.stmI don't see what is so wrong bout it. As if a 14 year old won't have seen something like it before. It's not like he sexually assaulted the lad. What if the same image was sent to him by one of his mates at school? It's not THAT bad tbf. Although I don't know what the image was... if it was an image of him then that is just dirty and perverted. If it's been posted before then I've not seen it but oh well Hardly the point. You do know it's illegal to engage in any sexual activity no matter what it is, whether it be intercourse or explicit pictures when one of the persons is under 16?? Come on DB, we all know your not all there, but you've gone one step too far this time, someone your age should know by now the rules regarding topics like this. It's not THAT bad? I don't think the authorities will see it that way.
NorthernFox Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 It's not THAT bad? I don't think the authorities will see it that way. Are you sure, did you see Chris Langhams sentance? Steal Money do 10 years plus, Murder Rape whatever - soft sentances. If the prisons are full - BUILD MORE PRISONS
Bert Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 Are you sure, did you see Chris Langhams sentance? Steal Money do 10 years plus, Murder Rape whatever - soft sentances.If the prisons are full - BUILD MORE PRISONS Ah yeah, good point there pal, and i know what you mean, but DB seems to have just brushed it off like its an every day occurance.
DB11 Posted 15 September 2007 Author Posted 15 September 2007 Hardly the point. You do know it's illegal to engage in any sexual activity no matter what it is, whether it be intercourse or explicit pictures when one of the persons is under 16??Come on DB, we all know your not all there, but you've gone one step too far this time, someone your age should know by now the rules regarding topics like this. It's not THAT bad? I don't think the authorities will see it that way. How is sending a porno image engaging in sexual activity? I'm not trying to defend him (i don't even know him) I just fail to see how it is as bad as something like raping an under 16 year old
Alexikokopops Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 How is sending a porno image engaging in sexual activity?I'm not trying to defend him (i don't even know him) I just fail to see how it is as bad as something like raping an under 16 year old You seem to be missing the point. He got sexual gratification from doing so. That is he was sexually aroused by sending images to a 14 year old boy. Maybe he's liking the thought of the boy getting excited by these images, if you catch my drift. Either way it's just not cricket.
lookwhaticando Posted 15 September 2007 Posted 15 September 2007 Why am I even trying? Good bloody question. No I don't understand. What is sexual gratification? How is sending a porno image engaging in sexual activity?I'm not trying to defend him I don't think you know what you're doing. That's quite obvious to thousands of FTers.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.