Fez of Mahrez Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 What's the point of having Dawson and O'Grady on the bench and not use them in a pointless end of season fixture? How are they supposed to prove themselves in the first team? It's not as if the first team are impressing today. Blah moan blah moan blah moan blah.
Louise Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 Oooer, as it stands Gillingham will go down on goals scored.
Louise Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 really? 104853[/snapback] No. I stupidly listened to the RL commentators when they said Gillingham and Crewe would have the same GD. As it stands Gillingham will go down on GD, not goals scored <_<
Louise Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 really? 104853[/snapback] No. I stupidly listened to the RL commentators when they said Gillingham and Crewe would have the same GD. As it stands Gillingham will go down on GD, not goals scored <_< 104856[/snapback] Forest 1-2 Gills, Crewe now going down
Louise Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 I feel a bit sorry for our fans, a long way to go for a dull game and no debut for Dawson.
davieG Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 I wished they'd stick to the Plymouth V LCFC game every time they talk about other games we miss all the excitement
Durnerz Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 really? 104853[/snapback] No. I stupidly listened to the RL commentators when they said Gillingham and Crewe would have the same GD. As it stands Gillingham will go down on GD, not goals scored <_< 104856[/snapback] Forest 1-2 Gills, Crewe now going down 104860[/snapback] Unless Ipswich score against Brighton
EmLeee Posted 8 May 2005 Posted 8 May 2005 really? 104853[/snapback] No. I stupidly listened to the RL commentators when they said Gillingham and Crewe would have the same GD. As it stands Gillingham will go down on GD, not goals scored <_< 104856[/snapback] Forest 1-2 Gills, Crewe now going down 104860[/snapback] Unless Ipswich score against Brighton 104865[/snapback] this is confusing me
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.