Dan Posted 3 August 2009 Posted 3 August 2009 Why not? Won't cost us a penny and is probably better than what we've got, Berner and Powell etc. I'm for the move, Mattock's been playing very poorly lately and I think a bit of competition will get the pair of them scrapping like hell for their place.Fair Enough, but i don't think he should be made priority unless we sell mattock Priority is a fast goalscorer without doubt, then a back-up big man, then a back-up keeper, IMO.
Budweiser Posted 3 August 2009 Posted 3 August 2009 where has this Tunchev rumour come from???? if we were to sell him (very unlikely <_< ) it would cost teams 5Mil+ imo. :eek:
Ultra Posted 4 August 2009 Posted 4 August 2009 If Fabian Delph is worth £9m then Tunchev, an experienced international of proven quality, has to be rated at least in the same price bracket.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 4 August 2009 Posted 4 August 2009 If Fabian Delph is worth £9m then Tunchev, an experienced international of proven quality, has to be rated at least in the same price bracket. About four million would be the right price for Tunchev.
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 4 August 2009 Posted 4 August 2009 About four million would be the right price for Tunchev. If we sold Tunchev I would be very very angry. He is the one player who I think could easily play in the Prem.
milan_foxes Posted 4 August 2009 Posted 4 August 2009 Currently linked withElliott Ward - Centre Half Issaiah Osbourne - Defensive Midfield McGivern - Left Back Kermogant - Striker This could mean goodbye to: King Mattock Tunchev Campbell (please, please, please) But even if they don't go we're not going to get the likes of Osbourne & McGivern on loan and not play them. We could therefore play Weale Neilson Hobbs Ward McGivern Oakley Wellens Osbourne N'Guessan Fryatt Kermogant So potentially 8 new players with only one of last years defence left. Personally I wouldn't want Tunchev to leave but Ward is a good player (and scores goals). If we could get 2 million for Mattock and McGivern on loan (possible to be signed at the end of the year) I'd be happy. Osboure would be a great defensive midfielder BUT doesn't scoire goals like King. Kermogant appears to take good free kicks and corners. Agreed or am I talking shite? Cant Miss Howard Out. He's The Key.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 5 August 2009 Posted 5 August 2009 This could mean goodbye to:King Mattock Tunchev Campbell (please, please, please) But even if they don't go we're not going to get the likes of Osbourne & McGivern on loan and not play them. Agreed or am I talking shite? Yes.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 5 August 2009 Posted 5 August 2009 If we sold Tunchev I would be very very angry. He is the one player who I think could easily play in the Prem. Yes. We would be crazy to let Tunchev go. A top class player.
Hackneyisblue Posted 5 August 2009 Author Posted 5 August 2009 Yes. We would be crazy to let Tunchev go. A top class player. So the last three who posted can't mange to read a full thread without jumping in. I think you'll find that we have all agreed that Tunchev isn't leaving.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.