Chimp Posted 23 May 2005 Posted 23 May 2005 I could be wrong but from what I remember on a previous thread his family once owned a 10% share of the training ground.Either way, I think it's a little unfair to press him for personal information that has the potential to reveal his RL identity. We all enjoy the anonymity that the internet gives us and, imo, it's rude to try to breach that. EDIT: Must learn to type faster... 112638[/snapback] Your memory does not fail you Chimp. But I didn't post that information because it is not true. That was a figment of Step's imagination... 113436[/snapback] Fair enough. I'm not normally one to call for a thred to be locked but in this case I think it's appropriate. No member of any forum should be pressurised into revealing RL information.
stez Posted 23 May 2005 Author Posted 23 May 2005 I could be wrong but from what I remember on a previous thread his family once owned a 10% share of the training ground.Either way, I think it's a little unfair to press him for personal information that has the potential to reveal his RL identity. We all enjoy the anonymity that the internet gives us and, imo, it's rude to try to breach that. EDIT: Must learn to type faster... 112638[/snapback] Your memory does not fail you Chimp. But I didn't post that information because it is not true. That was a figment of Step's imagination... 113436[/snapback] Fair enough. I'm not normally one to call for a thred to be locked but in this case I think it's appropriate. No member of any forum should be pressurised into revealing RL information. 113487[/snapback] if chandler didn't want people asking about his stake he shouldn't of mentioned it in a public forum, besides he's not going to answer the question (gee now theres a suprise) so that leads me to one conclusion..........
Chandler Posted 23 May 2005 Posted 23 May 2005 I could be wrong but from what I remember on a previous thread his family once owned a 10% share of the training ground.Either way, I think it's a little unfair to press him for personal information that has the potential to reveal his RL identity. We all enjoy the anonymity that the internet gives us and, imo, it's rude to try to breach that. EDIT: Must learn to type faster... 112638[/snapback] Your memory does not fail you Chimp. But I didn't post that information because it is not true. That was a figment of Step's imagination... 113436[/snapback] Fair enough. I'm not normally one to call for a thred to be locked but in this case I think it's appropriate. No member of any forum should be pressurised into revealing RL information. 113487[/snapback] if chandler didn't want people asking about his stake he shouldn't of mentioned it in a public forum, besides he's not going to answer the question (gee now theres a suprise) so that leads me to one conclusion.......... 113494[/snapback] 'Shouldn't have mentioned it...' you retard. But of course a RETARD would only be led to one conclusion wouldn't he? His feeble mind would be incapable of entertaining more than one possibility. I'll be generous Stez and give you the benefit of the doubt. Your comment is really intended as a heuristic device. There, that'll keep your long nose in the dictionary all afternoon - instead of in my business.
Ric Flair Posted 23 May 2005 Posted 23 May 2005 I could be wrong but from what I remember on a previous thread his family once owned a 10% share of the training ground.Either way, I think it's a little unfair to press him for personal information that has the potential to reveal his RL identity. We all enjoy the anonymity that the internet gives us and, imo, it's rude to try to breach that. EDIT: Must learn to type faster... 112638[/snapback] Your memory does not fail you Chimp. But I didn't post that information because it is not true. That was a figment of Step's imagination... 113436[/snapback] Fair enough. I'm not normally one to call for a thred to be locked but in this case I think it's appropriate. No member of any forum should be pressurised into revealing RL information. 113487[/snapback] if chandler didn't want people asking about his stake he shouldn't of mentioned it in a public forum, besides he's not going to answer the question (gee now theres a suprise) so that leads me to one conclusion.......... 113494[/snapback] 'Shouldn't have mentioned it...' you retard. But of course a RETARD would only be led to one conclusion wouldn't he? His feeble mind would be incapable of entertaining more than one possibility. I'll be generous Stez and give you the benefit of the doubt. Your comment is really intended as a heuristic device. There, that'll keep your long nose in the dictionary all afternoon - instead of in my business. 113674[/snapback] It's abit early for you isn't it Chandler? You don't usually start posting until after midnight. I got the impression you were a hamster Has your owner decided to clean the cage out and woke you up? Bastards aint they.
Chandler Posted 23 May 2005 Posted 23 May 2005 I could be wrong but from what I remember on a previous thread his family once owned a 10% share of the training ground.Either way, I think it's a little unfair to press him for personal information that has the potential to reveal his RL identity. We all enjoy the anonymity that the internet gives us and, imo, it's rude to try to breach that. EDIT: Must learn to type faster... 112638[/snapback] Your memory does not fail you Chimp. But I didn't post that information because it is not true. That was a figment of Step's imagination... 113436[/snapback] Fair enough. I'm not normally one to call for a thred to be locked but in this case I think it's appropriate. No member of any forum should be pressurised into revealing RL information. 113487[/snapback] if chandler didn't want people asking about his stake he shouldn't of mentioned it in a public forum, besides he's not going to answer the question (gee now theres a suprise) so that leads me to one conclusion.......... 113494[/snapback] 'Shouldn't have mentioned it...' you retard. But of course a RETARD would only be led to one conclusion wouldn't he? His feeble mind would be incapable of entertaining more than one possibility. I'll be generous Stez and give you the benefit of the doubt. Your comment is really intended as a heuristic device. There, that'll keep your long nose in the dictionary all afternoon - instead of in my business. 113674[/snapback] It's abit early for you isn't it Chandler? You don't usually start posting until after midnight. I got the impression you were a hamster Has your owner decided to clean the cage out and woke you up? Bastards aint they. 113675[/snapback] Gnaw, gnaw, nibble, gnaw, gnaw. Piss, nibble, nibble, gnaw, gnaw, Shit, shit, nibble, piss, wheel. Nibble shit, piss wheel, gnaw...
Collymore Posted 23 May 2005 Posted 23 May 2005 I could be wrong but from what I remember on a previous thread his family once owned a 10% share of the training ground.Either way, I think it's a little unfair to press him for personal information that has the potential to reveal his RL identity. We all enjoy the anonymity that the internet gives us and, imo, it's rude to try to breach that. EDIT: Must learn to type faster... 112638[/snapback] Your memory does not fail you Chimp. But I didn't post that information because it is not true. That was a figment of Step's imagination... 113436[/snapback] Fair enough. I'm not normally one to call for a thred to be locked but in this case I think it's appropriate. No member of any forum should be pressurised into revealing RL information. 113487[/snapback] if chandler didn't want people asking about his stake he shouldn't of mentioned it in a public forum, besides he's not going to answer the question (gee now theres a suprise) so that leads me to one conclusion.......... 113494[/snapback] 'Shouldn't have mentioned it...' you retard. But of course a RETARD would only be led to one conclusion wouldn't he? His feeble mind would be incapable of entertaining more than one possibility. I'll be generous Stez and give you the benefit of the doubt. Your comment is really intended as a heuristic device. There, that'll keep your long nose in the dictionary all afternoon - instead of in my business. 113674[/snapback] It's abit early for you isn't it Chandler? You don't usually start posting until after midnight. I got the impression you were a hamster Has your owner decided to clean the cage out and woke you up? Bastards aint they. 113675[/snapback] Gnaw, gnaw, nibble, gnaw, gnaw. Piss, nibble, nibble, gnaw, gnaw, Shit, shit, nibble, piss, wheel. Nibble shit, piss wheel, gnaw... 113689[/snapback] hope you were off the wheel during all that toilet action
stez Posted 23 May 2005 Author Posted 23 May 2005 I could be wrong but from what I remember on a previous thread his family once owned a 10% share of the training ground.Either way, I think it's a little unfair to press him for personal information that has the potential to reveal his RL identity. We all enjoy the anonymity that the internet gives us and, imo, it's rude to try to breach that. EDIT: Must learn to type faster... 112638[/snapback] Your memory does not fail you Chimp. But I didn't post that information because it is not true. That was a figment of Step's imagination... 113436[/snapback] Fair enough. I'm not normally one to call for a thred to be locked but in this case I think it's appropriate. No member of any forum should be pressurised into revealing RL information. 113487[/snapback] if chandler didn't want people asking about his stake he shouldn't of mentioned it in a public forum, besides he's not going to answer the question (gee now theres a suprise) so that leads me to one conclusion.......... 113494[/snapback] 'Shouldn't have mentioned it...' you retard. But of course a RETARD would only be led to one conclusion wouldn't he? His feeble mind would be incapable of entertaining more than one possibility. I'll be generous Stez and give you the benefit of the doubt. Your comment is really intended as a heuristic device. There, that'll keep your long nose in the dictionary all afternoon - instead of in my business. 113674[/snapback]
Chandler Posted 23 May 2005 Posted 23 May 2005 I could be wrong but from what I remember on a previous thread his family once owned a 10% share of the training ground.Either way, I think it's a little unfair to press him for personal information that has the potential to reveal his RL identity. We all enjoy the anonymity that the internet gives us and, imo, it's rude to try to breach that. EDIT: Must learn to type faster... 112638[/snapback] Your memory does not fail you Chimp. But I didn't post that information because it is not true. That was a figment of Step's imagination... 113436[/snapback] Fair enough. I'm not normally one to call for a thred to be locked but in this case I think it's appropriate. No member of any forum should be pressurised into revealing RL information. 113487[/snapback] if chandler didn't want people asking about his stake he shouldn't of mentioned it in a public forum, besides he's not going to answer the question (gee now theres a suprise) so that leads me to one conclusion.......... 113494[/snapback] 'Shouldn't have mentioned it...' you retard. But of course a RETARD would only be led to one conclusion wouldn't he? His feeble mind would be incapable of entertaining more than one possibility. I'll be generous Stez and give you the benefit of the doubt. Your comment is really intended as a heuristic device. There, that'll keep your long nose in the dictionary all afternoon - instead of in my business. 113674[/snapback] 113837[/snapback] Clearly a slip on the ol' keys Stez so I'll let you off. A true fickle bonehead would never acknowledge such an error. IT would have attacked me instead. Isn't that right Cambridge?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.