The Doctor Posted 30 August 2011 Posted 30 August 2011 So they are completely shit to us instead? I am not buying that. Claridge has an ethical issue with our spending which is some personal crusade. The presenter is probably too busy to pay proper attention. In my opinion The Football League show is a shit half cocked attempt to cover the football league that has neither the time of resources to do the job properly. As a result they make important errors and often fail to reflect games accurately. They would probably get a more accurate reflection by letting the respective local radio bods make an appraisal of games, and not some bloke sitting in a booth talking bollocks over 50 seconds of clips for each game. While I agree that the coverage of the football league is sub-par, particularly when you consider the highlights packages for the premiership I'd be tempted to side with Mr Spam here - The 'bias' shown isn't as bad as some make out (although last weeks was terrible - not iffy statements like on other occasions, clear factual inaccuracies such as the claim that Schmiechel threw the ball into the crowd) but that bit shown I would suspect may be down to over-doing the attempts to prevent bias towards us given our strong representation on the show (a fan and ex-player as presenters.) I would add that the anti-Leicester agenda people accuse the beeb of having is minimal in it's existence at most, and more likely a figment of their imaginations due to their own bias towards city.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.