5waller5 Posted 16 January 2012 Posted 16 January 2012 i dint realise Andy King had been playing for us this season . . . . . . . . ... he stands the other side of Wellens. Move seats and you can see him from a different angle!
Fox92 Posted 16 January 2012 Posted 16 January 2012 I think that Sven brought some of the wrong players in the summer. I think he brought players that we didn't need (for example, Ball), he didn't give some players a chance (such as Kennedy) and I questioned some of the transfers out (Hobbs for instance). And under Sven, I thought we didn't look organised or motivated. The team didn't look good enough and we were beaten easily. I was pleased when Nigel came in, regardless of whether Sven should have been sacked or not. I still believe he can get it right, but again it is though the players are not bothered anyway. But then again, they do not support Leicester and they do not know what it is like when we loose. I think we are playing the wrong football, we need it on the ground and not in the air. Although I think the defence look better under Nigel, I still think we are easy to beat which is something Keith Hill has come out and said. I still feel too many of our players are too weak, especially Gallagher, Dyer and King. We cannot afford to carry players, all 11 players need to work hard for each other and not back out of challenges. I also think we need some and a mobile target man, in particular, which is another downfall of Sven. Only a few positives have come out of the season so far... Kasper, Konchesky and Nugent. As for this poll, I know what you are getting at, but I don't understand why King is mentioned. This whole season isn't his fault, regardless of whether he plays good or bad.
wellyfox Posted 16 January 2012 Posted 16 January 2012 This really is a fooking joke. So you look to blame King when wellens and others have not done it. I will admit I have a problem with wellens Tired at 31 can't train then fvckin move closer to the club. Do I blame him for our shite season NO. Get over yourself it ain;t one mans fault and not king's. As for them that think we will still go up lol lol lol lol lol lol
There's only one Izzet Posted 17 January 2012 Author Posted 17 January 2012 i dint realise Andy King had been playing for us this season . . . . . . . . Exactly.
There's only one Izzet Posted 17 January 2012 Author Posted 17 January 2012 I think that Sven brought some of the wrong players in the summer. I think he brought players that we didn't need (for example, Ball), he didn't give some players a chance (such as Kennedy) and I questioned some of the transfers out (Hobbs for instance). And under Sven, I thought we didn't look organised or motivated. The team didn't look good enough and we were beaten easily. I was pleased when Nigel came in, regardless of whether Sven should have been sacked or not. I still believe he can get it right, but again it is though the players are not bothered anyway. But then again, they do not support Leicester and they do not know what it is like when we loose. I think we are playing the wrong football, we need it on the ground and not in the air. Although I think the defence look better under Nigel, I still think we are easy to beat which is something Keith Hill has come out and said. I still feel too many of our players are too weak, especially Gallagher, Dyer and King. We cannot afford to carry players, all 11 players need to work hard for each other and not back out of challenges. I also think we need some and a mobile target man, in particular, which is another downfall of Sven. Only a few positives have come out of the season so far... Kasper, Konchesky and Nugent. As for this poll, I know what you are getting at, but I don't understand why King is mentioned. This whole season isn't his fault, regardless of whether he plays good or bad. Thanks for the response. I am not blaming him for how the season has gone, but i do thin that he is out of his depth and doesn't offer much for the team.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.