marko Posted 28 July 2005 Posted 28 July 2005 His distribution was poor alot of the time, often opting for the difficult ball. The bloke couldn't find a blue shirt in the City shop. Extremely average
lush Posted 28 July 2005 Posted 28 July 2005 Hey there Sheff utd fan here .Just wondering if Lilian Nalis is a good player capable of playing at this level? Is he a good signing for us? Im not sure about him so i thought id come and ask you. Thanks alot. Brad 145070[/snapback] When he first arrived, we were treated to the call of the jungle (nicknames tarzan). Not long into the premiership season, the foxes jungle was clearly alive when tarzan called upon the foxes faithfull to scream out loud with a rasping 30 yarder against leeds utd (sky tv monday night, you may have seen it?, 4-0). Since then the foxes jungle has been slowly tammed, as tarzan began to lose the hi-speed tree to tree, game to game swing, from rope to rope, tackle to tackle, of the English game. He did however score 5 goals early on last season, but since then was `put down` after severe football illnesses (cant pass, no physical ability, no inteligence etc). But like in the film E.T., if you can revive his glowing heart (long distance shooting), he may come alive and rejoin the wild alien jungle. He will need to sharpen his hunting blade, everyday.
henry's best mate Posted 29 July 2005 Posted 29 July 2005 nalis was a good passer, good at passing the ball backwards that is, when leicester were playin poor CL decided to bring on nalis at half-time, then nalis gets replaced after 20 minutesbecause CL realises that he is crap and wouldn't have got leicester back into the game. the only reason why CL brought on (or played) nalis in season is because the little kids could see nalis, because of 'that goal against leeds'. joey gudjonsson is far better, he might not be able to shoot, but i tought that strikers were for that? not defensive midfielders. makelele can't shoot, gattuso can't shoot, emerson can't shoot, so what? do people think that because nalis can shoot then he is better than these three world-class enforcers and would rather have him playin in front of them? i know that i wouldn't. joey gudjonsson is a carve-and-copy when it comes to possesing the correct qualities of a DMC, breaks up play, and gets stuck into the ball.
davieG Posted 29 July 2005 Posted 29 July 2005 nalis was a good passer, good at passing the ball backwards that is, when leicester were playin poor CL decided to bring on nalis at half-time, then nalis gets replaced after 20 minutesbecause CL realises that he is crap and wouldn't have got leicester back into the game. the only reason why CL brought on (or played) nalis in season is because the little kids could see nalis, because of 'that goal against leeds'. joey gudjonsson is far better, he might not be able to shoot, but i tought that strikers were for that? not defensive midfielders. makelele can't shoot, gattuso can't shoot, emerson can't shoot, so what? do people think that because nalis can shoot then he is better than these three world-class enforcers and would rather have him playin in front of them? i know that i wouldn't. joey gudjonsson is a carve-and-copy when it comes to possesing the correct qualities of a DMC, breaks up play, and gets stuck into the ball. 146434[/snapback] Who said Nalis was a defensive midfielder, by the way Joey's crap even as a defensive midfielder, can't tackle, can't pass and the only thing he can shoot is someone up in row ZZ. Well I think so.
Hazza Posted 29 July 2005 Posted 29 July 2005 I did hear Warnock say Nalis could be like Stuart McCall for Sheff Utd, which is totally wrong as Nalis is a different player. Not likely to put in a load of tackles like McCall anyway, will get a fair few goals if played regularly and on his day could be one of the best passers of the ball in the league. He can just as easily have off-days though. I like him though, very complimentay about Leicester as a place and club.
C-man Posted 29 July 2005 Posted 29 July 2005 Nalis cant defend for his life. he constantly got on the wrong side of the ball, leaving the player a free run at our defense, which on so many occasions caused us problems
Scow Posted 29 July 2005 Posted 29 July 2005 nalis was a good passer, good at passing the ball backwards that is, when leicester were playin poor CL decided to bring on nalis at half-time, then nalis gets replaced after 20 minutesbecause CL realises that he is crap and wouldn't have got leicester back into the game. the only reason why CL brought on (or played) nalis in season is because the little kids could see nalis, because of 'that goal against leeds'. joey gudjonsson is far better, he might not be able to shoot, but i tought that strikers were for that? not defensive midfielders. makelele can't shoot, gattuso can't shoot, emerson can't shoot, so what? do people think that because nalis can shoot then he is better than these three world-class enforcers and would rather have him playin in front of them? i know that i wouldn't. joey gudjonsson is a carve-and-copy when it comes to possesing the correct qualities of a DMC, breaks up play, and gets stuck into the ball. 146434[/snapback] How many times did that happen then?
Brad-Blade Posted 2 August 2005 Author Posted 2 August 2005 Well i think he can pass! Set up our goal against sunderland last saturday with a pearler! Brad :-)
Muz Posted 2 August 2005 Posted 2 August 2005 Well i think he can pass! Set up our goal against sunderland last saturday with a pearler!Brad :-) 148475[/snapback] Oh i wish we could have him back *No Sarcism Intended *
Brad-Blade Posted 2 August 2005 Author Posted 2 August 2005 Oh i wish we could have him back *No Sarcism Intended * 148478[/snapback] Ull stand corrected if he scores a 30 yarder against you on saturday which i doubt Brad
Brad-Blade Posted 2 August 2005 Author Posted 2 August 2005 Hey Brad the blunt, where abouts do you live in Sheff? 145224[/snapback] Killamarsh u?
Scow Posted 2 August 2005 Posted 2 August 2005 From what I can gather, Nick Montgomery is due to play in the centre of midfield with Nalis, which should help him. Montgomery is the type of player who will cover plenty of the pitch and should provide the legs for Nalis.
Muz Posted 2 August 2005 Posted 2 August 2005 Killamarsh u? 148486[/snapback] Turns out Brad the Blade lives near me , you know where Worksop is ?
Brad-Blade Posted 2 August 2005 Author Posted 2 August 2005 From what I can gather, Nick Montgomery is due to play in the centre of midfield with Nalis, which should help him. Montgomery is the type of player who will cover plenty of the pitch and should provide the legs for Nalis. 148487[/snapback] yep,they seem a good partnership,Monty wins the ball and since he cant pass to save his own life,gives it to nalis (with a bit of luck) Nalis boots it to Webber and then ey presto! Blades 1-0 Foxes
Brad-Blade Posted 2 August 2005 Author Posted 2 August 2005 Turns out Brad the Blade lives near me , you know where Worksop is ? 148492[/snapback] hmmmmm,yeh!
Muz Posted 2 August 2005 Posted 2 August 2005 hmmmmm,yeh! 148496[/snapback] Well thats the shit hole i live in
Brad-Blade Posted 2 August 2005 Author Posted 2 August 2005 hmmmmm,yeh! 148496[/snapback] What do we all think the score will be on Sat? 2-1 Blades
Muz Posted 2 August 2005 Posted 2 August 2005 What do we all think the score will be on Sat? 2-1 Blades 148505[/snapback] Heart says 3-2 to the Foxes , head says 2-0 to you We always play shit at Brammal Lane!
Brad-Blade Posted 2 August 2005 Author Posted 2 August 2005 Heart says 3-2 to the Foxes , head says 2-0 to you We always play shit at Brammal Lane! 148508[/snapback] 2 Nalis goals? Brad Ps.I havnt been smoking crack
Muz Posted 2 August 2005 Posted 2 August 2005 2 Nalis goals? Brad Ps.I havnt been smoking crack 148513[/snapback] If Nalis scores 2 goals on saturday ill chop my right testicle off and donate it to a Charity of your choice
Janx Posted 2 August 2005 Posted 2 August 2005 Unlucky ground for me...and Im going so Im going to be pessimistic and think a draw would suit, hoping to win...obviously!
Brad-Blade Posted 2 August 2005 Author Posted 2 August 2005 If Nalis scores 2 goals on saturday ill chop my right testicle off and donate it to a Charity of your choice 148518[/snapback]
Stuliasz Posted 2 August 2005 Posted 2 August 2005 My record at Bramall Lane has been very bad for Sheff Utd, except when playing Leicester. Since I moved up there 2 years ago, I've seen about 9 or 10 games there altogether, only seeing them win twice, both against us!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.