Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Dahnsouff

Forum Supporter
  • Posts

    25,802
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Dahnsouff

  1. Wondering if we now might decide to swallow our pride and move forward with this - which would be......kinda dumb, so quite possible
  2. No doubting it was silly, do not remotely understand it, but it should not impact us in further signings was my only point. Maybe we are buying under the assumption someone is leaving, if so we deserve all we get
  3. He won’t start, it will be Mav.
  4. Time to bury the hatchet, forget past misdemeanours, forgive him, kiss and make up and go get Fabian Reese.
  5. It is crazy contentious I agree, but I am not convinced it is insurmountable nor that it should prevent us from trying. There are plenty of presented reasons to reject such a tax, from tax flight to over inclusion of current tax payers, but it remains one of the few choices left to perform a wide reaching wealth redistribution across the population, a wealth redistribution that is well overdue. Bit of stuff from the FT if interested :- Who’s afraid of a wealth tax? (ft.com) There are many petitions out there for demanding the change Tax the Super Rich! | WeMove Europe Sign the petition to tax the rich | Fight Inequality Alliance Home - Tax Justice UK and there are loads more
  6. There is plenty of scare material for Wealth Taxes, thinking it applies to you, where in reality if you are worried it applies to you, it likely doesn't or you would not care.
  7. If anyone is unclear who we are talking about here, listen to this guy (Ex-trader) I like Gary, even if he gets a bit repetitive over multiple videos ( https://www.youtube.com/@garyseconomics )
  8. What is the entry fee for Kettering Scooter World? Does it have a cafe?
  9. Although it being an unexpectedly flippant (*snigger*) response from @Daggers it is a genuine response I see from some, specifically that the rate should be "more than what I have", which is of course an undermining argument.
  10. Town centres have not counted as places for the living for some time unfortunately
  11. I don`t earn money, I steal a living
  12. Historically, when tried in Spain, Norway and Switzerland, it hasn't Was discussed I believe during the Heath government, but rejected as too costly and awkward. Not the greatest endorsement I agree, but wealth disparity is now such a problem and it also being a fundamental driver behind many current problems, something must be done or at least tried. The basic principle is that if you have assets (Its all about assets) where assets could be simply quantified as A wealth tax is a tax levied on the net fair market value of a taxpayer’s assets. It applies to the net fair market value of all or some of a variety of asset types held by a taxpayer, including cash, bank deposits, shares, fixed assets, personal cars, real property, pension plans, money funds, owner-occupied housing, and trusts. Typically, wealth taxation often involves the exclusion of an individual's liabilities, such as mortgages and other debts, from their total assets and to calculate net worth, you'll subtract a person's liabilities from their assets. If you have assets over X value, say 1m? 2m? 10m? (Super contentious) then you pay a percentage on it, either as a one-off or recurring due. Is tax flight (People leave because you are taxing them) an issue? Yes according to some, no according to others, so hard to say. (Taxing at the source of generation not registration is the other option I guess, this where you own a supermarket or shares in it in the UK for example, but live in Belize, you would still pay UK tax as the expenditure to mature the asset is from the UK - no idea if this is possible, but it seems fair ) This is all big change, but guess what....it is needed imho
  13. I realise this a popularist and flippant response, but it is also a sure fire way to scupper any such tax
  14. Would personally like to see an attempt be made, but with care so as not to derail it before it can even begin.
  15. A potential vote loser especially with pseudo lobbying, but is it worth trying? (Despite the historic failures in Europe in attempting to do so) Is this something we should pressure for as the voting public? Do not mean count Capital Gains, Inheritance, etc, as this would be a tax on sitting assets. Who’s afraid of a wealth tax? (ft.com)
  16. It looks proper grim right now, but as always, it will be memorable.
  17. Fear we just aren't at all attractive at present.
  18. You wish, Ayew is way out of our league.
  19. Agree seems unlikely wages were the problem.
  20. He wanted to stay in Germany and as Alban said, not agreeing personal terms first is odd. We are as appealing as a shit sandwich at the minute.
  21. He wanted to stay in Germany. We did not push or were not encouraged to Bummer. Quite wanted this lad. Next.
  22. This is just the facetious stage of grief, it'll pass.
  23. Can believe this is more likely the reason, as it seemed odd when I read Rutter sell on justified them moving for Hzolek (After their frontman got crocked)
×
×
  • Create New...