Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Dahnsouff

Forum Supporter
  • Posts

    25,796
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Dahnsouff

  1. This ref is not a fan of ours clearly
  2. The words "you reap what you sow" should be club motto
  3. He comes everyones darling Wout
  4. Better be two up top, or what is the point?
  5. Might as well put Daka on
  6. In simple terms, so our bunch of pre-schoolers in the first XI can understand
  7. This is a team full of simpletons
  8. God we are shite
  9. Well ,Okoli looking ok
  10. Fair, think I have a misconception that Bouba is a unit and taking him out we lose something.
  11. Know what you mean about the formation, I realise 4231 is the "in vogue" formation right now, but come on....
  12. So you are happy for Skipp or Hamza to play there? Back at you All three are dreadful, we need new.
  13. What a stupid comment
  14. Bouba is naff, he needs bombing out the starting XI, but not for others who are every bit as unreliable/poor. Otherwise we just keep swapping between one-legged men in blind hope. Maybe Page, but its a big ask for the youngster. Skipp, Hamza are not serious options and are every bit as poor as Bouba. We desperately need Midfield reinforcements.
  15. Why are people still moaning cos Soumare starts? Alternatives are Skipp or Page, one is just as bad, one needs easing in. Full expect that to change before the window closes thankfully.
  16. Provide an example of someone who isn't English and has a similar numbers but who then went for 30m?
  17. Hamza definitely fixes this Wrexham defence.
  18. And Brunt, just need Hamza at RB and the gangs all back together….
  19. Aluko? Starting to think we might be seeing so much youth this year it’s going to give @Ric Flair a nosebleed
  20. Quite, but still better than him not!
  21. True, but I still expect him to go for less than the reported clause as he would have been identified as a profit
  22. Not sure this is true, is it? This is just ending the period of "no less than X", after which we may be tempted by profitable low balls
  23. Sell for £5m and send them Soumare (and/or Skipp)
  24. £7.5million and 6 points on his license seems reasonable
×
×
  • Create New...