Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

phoneticerror

Member
  • Posts

    7,226
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by phoneticerror

  1. That’s a worry cos he was photographed at Seagrave a few days ago
  2. Let’s face it. Probably a typo at the club
  3. Time on contract makes him a saleable asset though, so pros and cons
  4. They’ve started to appear
  5. It’s in the description on the product page
  6. Exactly this. It’s all relative to their share of the pie. For anybody who disagrees, I’d imagine they should stop supporting the club and head down Anstey Nomads instead
  7. They ain’t gonna give a crap if I have the sponsor on my shirt in my garden or SK4. They care about what’s on Jamie Vardy’s shirt
  8. You’d like to think they’d make it easier though instead of hiding it in the description.
  9. So you’d rather they get the living wage and the club keep all the cash? Come on.
  10. That’s different and you bloody know it
  11. I wonder when we will start to sell the £125 ‘player versions’. I’m shocked we haven’t jumped on that band wagon this season.
  12. Correct me if I’m wrong here, but I assumed player heads had been added in post cos this leaked with the original image weeks ago. Who the hell is this guy?
  13. The retro ones feel like shit too. 92 and 94 in particular
  14. Without a sponsor on the kids shirts, they’re gonna be so easy to replicate on the Gate…. The KP logo was the problem with the fakes last year
  15. Still produced locally. If we focus too much on that kinda thing the fan base will only be happy when the club is sponsored by the new market
  16. I have that for my lad. Looks great until you put it up next to the real one. The texture on that fabric is hard to replicate. His England kit is cracking though. Only way you can tell the difference is to pay VERY close attention to the location of the badge and Nike swoosh
  17. What was wrong with the other thread? 🤦‍♂️
  18. Look on DH Gate in a few weeks. It’s the only way if you want to do that.
  19. I’d have loved Walkers back. It meant something because they were local. Whilst I don’t like who the new sponsor are, at least the Pac-Man looks nicer than block letters saying FBS TRADE ONLINE
  20. They’re even worse.
  21. Somebody said on here (I can’t remember who) - “wait until you see the back” A simple “foxes never quit” isn’t really worth that hype 😂😂 On the plus side, (no pun intended), these seem to be regular fit not skinny fit like last year
  22. With that said, it’s nice to have the Premier League font back isn’t it!
  23. Quite proud of my 9 year old. Showed him the shirts. ”why doesn’t the kids one look the same as what the players wear?” ”because the sponsor isn’t suitable for kids” ”oh… yeah, I’ll stick with last years then. I don’t like that”
  24. https://shop.lcfc.com/en/leicester-city-men-s-home-shirt-2024-25-adults
×
×
  • Create New...