Zingari

if i didn't know better , i'd swear you were implying the film was anti white propaganda that was trying to depict blacks as always victims of brutal oppression. surely not ?

Careful what you wish for Lamby lad it really isn't pleasant when mass brawls occur , unless you're a psychopath or summat. i wouldn't mind if i never see one again , it's fook all like hollywood westerns

i suppose it was pretty scary stuff actually wasn't it ? i remember being in a bar in Blackpool when a mass brawl erupted and glasses started flying . at the time it's very very scary. i must admit i soon made a bolt for the nearest exit .

Blimey , that sounds like a whole lotta fun . And they say people don't know how to enjoy themselves these days .

It's probably just an alien space ship preparing to invade but they need more info about us . They're using mobile phone signals to track and select humans suitable for abduction and experimentation Nah it's probably one of the planets , Venus maybe ? .

ah , by being "reliant on the state" , you mean Gordon was getting the masses "reliant on working for the state". i thought you meant "reliant on state benefits".( which is what we were talking about at the time) While this may be true , and yes it does seem to have happened that more people were employed in these jobs than previously , it still means that most people will work if the job is available to them rather than laze about smokin anna drinkin anna shaggin., you were implying that people won't take jobs regardless and were intent on living on benefits But i really must leave it here as i'm supposed to be fookin retired and enjoying a life of leisure now , not spending hours trying to convince dyed in the wool tories about stuff i've got no chance of doing

Yeah they're lovely til they get to about 13 or 14 , then ..............well let's just say i'm glad when they got married

Do you really , i mean really really believe that ? Gordon Brown intended to turn all the desperate job seekers into wet nursed layabouts ???? As you said yourself in a previous post , we might as well leave it there , believe what you wanna believe matt

Of course there are some scroungers , but no more than there were before (% wise ) the point i'm trying to make ( pretty unsuccessfully) is that there isn't enough jobs for all those that really really want and desperately need work , But this government is using carpet bombing techniques on all the unemployed

and you accuse me of using " i know this bloke " reasoning edit; and even if this is ridiculous plucked out the air guesstimation is true it still leaves 1 and half million chasing a half million jobs. that leaves 2 out of 3 people who are trying but unsuccessfully getting a job

There you go again , Theres half a million vacancies , 3 million ( at least) unemployed , how the fook can that be a job for anyone who wants one , and why have the very same people who were previously depicted as victims of failed labour policies now layabouts not wanting work ? Did 2 MILLION + magically transform from desperate jobseekers into scrounging layabouts the minute Cameron was elected , there really isn't jobs for everyone, it's a scam

it's not a solution though , it's just a stupid politically motivated exercise in keeping the scum down . in the same way closing the mines wasn't about saving money or been good for the long term health of the nation. you said there were jobs for everyone , make you're mind up ,

if you wanna believe the figures fine , but they're bolstered and manipulated by bullshite statistics there are half a million job vacancies and at least 3 million job seekers even i can see that's not a job for everyone

no i'm not , i'm just trying to point out how the unemployed are depicted . victims when in opposition . problem when in power

maybe the people i know who can't , and haven't been able to get jobs for months must be all layabouts then , it's funny because its an affliction they've only just acquired .

when the tories are the opposition , the lack of jobs and unemployment is due to the government policies when they're in power it's because they are layabouts

its only a welfare dependency problem when the tories are in power , when labour are in power it's a shite government not providing the jobs

Maybe there's an element of truth in that , but politicians could spend more time and effort looking for real solutions to the problems the country is facing and not kicking the weakest and most vulnerable especially as they don't actually seem to be saving anything more than peanuts once the administration costs ATOS and Capita are counted. .

I'm pretty sure it's intentional and not a spelling mistake . It's a homophone isn't it ? They are using the normal term welfare rights , but substituting "writes" because it a template letter writing service. Lots of businesses etc do similar things, eg hairdressers are sometimes called things like "curl up and dye" , or a fish and chip shop might be called "john's plaice" etc etc

ah yes , it was just a first reading of the bill , there's a second reading on the 28th . http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/recap-labour-pass-bill-scrap-3137084

i read the other day that there was a parliamentary vote to scrap the whole idea of bedroom tax ( the tories all abstained or something) but I've not heard anything about it since . do you know what happened ?

Universal Credit: Government's welfare reform ‘may be scrapped after next election’ The future of the Government’s major £2bn welfare reform was thrown into fresh doubt on Wednesday night after it emerged that just a handful of claimants have been enrolled into the new system. The Department for Work and Pensions disclosed that only 3,200 people had been signed up to receive Universal Credit – a fraction of the original target – at a cost of nearly £200,000 per person. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/universal-credit-governments-welfare-reform-may-be-scrapped-after-next-election-9139458.html that'll be our taxes well spent then , well done ! anymore bright ideas?

i'm not spinning anything i'm trying to keep pointing out to you that in some sections of the media it's being reported as a "fall in unemployment" and in others its being reported as "a suprising rise in unemployment" . http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/02/19/uk-britain-jobs-idUKBREA1I0HI20140219 How is it me doing that ? I really don't have that sort of power

i notice you say they are "no longer unemployed" , rather than now in full time employment , but however , I'd called a it massive fall in unemployment when there was a significantly smaller percentage of the population unemployed , not a slightly bigger one.however it may be spun .

No I don't i think you're well to the right of him seriously though , you're right , it doesn't seem to add up at all