Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

The Doctor

Member
  • Posts

    33,175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by The Doctor

  1. generally when they don't get the decision they're straight back up, daka wasn't.
  2. Unsurprising, imagine being a Plastic Argie.
  3. hallelujah, they finally get a booking.
  4. He's really not. McAllister took out I think Winks one working week after the pass went, ref signaled play on but didn't go back for the mandatory yellow. Van Dijk studs first into Daka having previously rugby tackled him to stop him being in a foot race with TAA.
  5. Studs straight into him, it's a clear foul, and if a player is lying not moving for 30+ seconds, there's clearly something wrong.
  6. They should definitely be down to 10 at this point between McAllister and Van Dijk, but not even a booking.
  7. Refs really having a shocker, we're down to 10 due to injury and he's just playing on.
  8. Now, is that not a foul on Soumare by McAllister? Just dives into him with the ball running out of play.
  9. Very very lucky, no way he knew anything about that.
  10. This fog is getting worse, no way this gets played all the way
  11. Go to the ball there Stephy. Know he got the assist but he's not really on it today
  12. Should have been two if Stephy hadn't made such a honking pass.
  13. oh, I was gonna say most men think they can do it but they really can't
  14. mean to quote someone else there?
  15. gonna go back and book McAllister for the tackle that arrived 3 business days after the ball went ref? No, thought no.
  16. Van Dijk just got both hands on Daka to stop him chasing against the last defender.
  17. that's a clear shirt pull on Daka ref?
  18. full time whistle now ref
  19. Honestly not convinced he was. He had a decent spell at Aberdeen, but then at Huddersfield, yes they won promotion, but with a negative goal difference and conceding more than relegated Wigan.
  20. Honestly if this is because wolves have appealed, then it's clearly abusing the appeals process to keep a player available, knowing 4 games will have passed before the appeal is heard. Points deduction should be the only punishment, anything else is rewarding those budget brummie twats for cheating like this.
  21. Some talent to commit GBH and get away with it.
  22. If wolves stay up at our expense, I genuinely think we should sue the FA for failing to get this ban implemented in a timely fashion. Their incompetence would clearly have caused severe financial detriment to us.
  23. no they haven't, we've gone through this before, you've had correct decisions made against you and act robbed as a result.
  24. yea it was, just like wolves aren't actually regularly hard done by by VAR, and yet you constantly play the victim about it
  25. and of course the man who should be suspended scores again.
×
×
  • Create New...