I've returned to Brand's statement to double-check my understanding of what he said: https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/russell-brands-statement-full-ahead-30954760 (video also available).
He wasn't saying that the different accusations were coordinated. He was saying that the two different media organisations (Times and Channel 4) were engaged in a coordinated MSM attack on him, on "these kind of spaces", his followers' voices etc.
In other words, absolutely classic conspiracy theory fear-mongering about powerful interests having a mysterious "agenda" against him as a tribune of the people.
Brand is an intelligent man who has worked in various forms of media for decades. He therefore knows that newspapers and TV channels sometimes conduct joint investigations. He is clearly dishonestly pretending that he doesn't know this in order to manipulate fearful, gullible people into seeing this as a conspiracy and supporting him in his hour of need.
People can make up their own minds on the credibility of the accusations made against him. I watched the programme and found them pretty credible - and backed by secondary research into the credibility of the accusations and more wide-ranging circumstantial evidence. As others have said, that might not be sufficient evidence for charges to be brought against him - it rarely is in such cases and I don't know what can be done about that. But for me the very fact that he is dishonestly peddling conspiracy theories and fears of mysterious powers and agendas is evidence of him acting in bad faith to protect his personal position.