Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest MattP
Posted
35 minutes ago, Buce said:

 

It ignored advice from (and subsequently disbanded) the body they themselves had tasked with assessing whether it should be legalised because they didn't like the answer that they were given. How is that any different?

 

And they sacked their own 'drugs tzar' when he concluded that alcohol was more dangerous:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/30/drugs-adviser-david-nutt-sacked

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/6470090/Three-more-drug-advisers-quit-over-sacking-of-Professor-David-Nutt.html

That was all the way back in 2009. Not really relevant to today I don't think.

Posted
2 minutes ago, MattP said:

That was all the way back in 2009. Not really relevant to today I don't think.

 

Why not?

 

The issue remains the same, so does the advice.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...