Mark Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 This is not including the shit that we need to move on from, in my opinion and hopefully Leveins .......................Walker .........Heath Keown Stearman Canero.................................Stewart ........Gudjonsson Dawson Williams ...............Connolly Wright Subs: Pressman, Scowcroft, Porter, Petrescu, Nalis Love it
Mark Posted 31 October 2004 Author Posted 31 October 2004 I would rather have Elliott than Keown 31932[/snapback] Keown would be able to help Stearman and Heath more than Elliott through a game, alot more knowledgeable also.
Scarby Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 I would rather have Elliott than Keown 31932[/snapback] Keown would be able to help Stearman and Heath more than Elliott through a game. 31933[/snapback] Keown has more experience at a higher level so i can see your point but Elliott is no walk over he has done wonders for Matty Heath for has come on leaps and bounds in the past few years.
MON Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 This is not including the shit that we need to move on from, in my opinion and hopefully Leveins .......................Walker .........Heath Keown Stearman Canero.................................Stewart ........Gudjonsson Dawson Williams ...............Connolly Wright Subs: Pressman, Scowcroft, Porter, Petrescu, Nalis Love it 31929[/snapback] a very good team, scowy for wright, nalis for williams and tiatto for stewart and tiatto for dawson and that could be a real possibility in the next month or so.
Mark Posted 31 October 2004 Author Posted 31 October 2004 This is not including the shit that we need to move on from, in my opinion and hopefully Leveins .......................Walker .........Heath Keown Stearman Canero.................................Stewart ........Gudjonsson Dawson Williams ...............Connolly Wright Subs: Pressman, Scowcroft, Porter, Petrescu, Nalis Love it 31929[/snapback] a very good team, scowy for wright, nalis for williams and tiatto for stewart and tiatto for dawson and that could be a real possibility in the next month or so. 31935[/snapback] Ok, but that completely ruins the look of a team for the future Two Tiattos?
Durnerz Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 Wheres tiatto? hes better and more commited than stewart.
Mark Posted 31 October 2004 Author Posted 31 October 2004 Wheres tiatto? hes better and more commited than stewart. 31938[/snapback] Suspended.
SamuearlJackson Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 well we seem to have consensus that 3-5-2 is the way we'd like to see the team go i still don't reckon that is the best team we can put out right now and i'm not prepared to give up on the season. added to that team should be elliott and scowcroft at least. would like to see dawson and stearman blooded increasingly though. i'm afraid i don't think wright has what it takes at this level SamJ
Mark Posted 31 October 2004 Author Posted 31 October 2004 well we seem to have consensus that 3-5-2 is the way we'd like to see the team go i still don't reckon that is the best team we can put out right now and i'm not prepared to give up on the season. added to that team should be elliott and scowcroft at least. would like to see dawson and stearman blooded increasingly though. i'm afraid i don't think wright has what it takes at this level SamJ 31941[/snapback] Dublin, Blake, Benjamin dont have what it takes, but they have had many more chances than Wright to show how shit they are. Everyone deserves a chance, he hasnt done much for us because he's never had the chance to.
Guest Daniel Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 I would rather have Elliott than Keown 31932[/snapback] Must be crazy, Keown is one of the best players at this club, elliott about the worst now.
Scow Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 I would rather have Elliott than Keown 31932[/snapback] Must be crazy, Keown is one of the best players at this club, elliott about the worst now. 31946[/snapback] You must be joking - Not with the likes of Heath and Dabizas around.
MON Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 This is not including the shit that we need to move on from, in my opinion and hopefully Leveins .......................Walker .........Heath Keown Stearman Canero.................................Stewart ........Gudjonsson Dawson Williams ...............Connolly Wright Subs: Pressman, Scowcroft, Porter, Petrescu, Nalis Love it 31929[/snapback] a very good team, scowy for wright, nalis for williams and tiatto for stewart and tiatto for dawson and that could be a real possibility in the next month or so. 31935[/snapback] Ok, but that completely ruins the look of a team for the future Two Tiattos? 31937[/snapback] ok, i meant tiatto for stewart, then whished we had 2 tiattos. my team for the future that would do well would be gk walker stearman keown elliot canero stewart dawson nalis tiatto scowy Connoly.
Guest Daniel Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 Well, he's pretty useless and very slow. I suppose though, Heath and Dabizas are prize pillocks at the back.
Steven Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 well we seem to have consensus that 3-5-2 is the way we'd like to see the team go i still don't reckon that is the best team we can put out right now and i'm not prepared to give up on the season. added to that team should be elliott and scowcroft at least. would like to see dawson and stearman blooded increasingly though. i'm afraid i don't think wright has what it takes at this level SamJ 31941[/snapback] I would love 3-5-2 and I have said elsewhere that suits the squad.
Jonbluefox9 Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 I'd prefer Elliott to Keown. Keown isn't as used to this level of football as Elliott and when things aren't going our way he seems to start blaming everyone else. He's good when we're playing well but I think he isn't up for a battle.
Scow Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 Well, he's pretty useless and very slow.I suppose though, Heath and Dabizas are prize pillocks at the back. 31952[/snapback] When has Elliott ever had any pace? He's useless now? He was our best player yesterday.
Guest Daniel Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 I'd prefer Elliott to Keown. Keown isn't as used to this level of football as Elliott and when things aren't going our way he seems to start blaming everyone else. He's good when we're playing well but I think he isn't up for a battle. 31954[/snapback] Yeah i agree, keowns never up for a battle...
MON Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 I'd prefer Elliott to Keown. Keown isn't as used to this level of football as Elliott and when things aren't going our way he seems to start blaming everyone else. He's good when we're playing well but I think he isn't up for a battle. 31954[/snapback] Yeah i agree, keowns never up for a battle... 31956[/snapback] good pictures. He would scare the shit out of anyone.
King Kyle lcfc Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 Gordon GK Canero RWB Steaman CB Pressley CB Heath CB Stewart LWB Hamill RCM Dawson CM Webster LCM Wright RF Pereira LF that would make a good reserve team i suppose
Guest Daniel Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 Gordon GKCanero RWB Steaman CB Pressley CB Heath CB Stewart LWB Hamill RCM Dawson CM Webster LCM Wright RF Pereira LF that would make a good reserve team i suppose 31959[/snapback] Reserves? Why dont you follow Micky Adams? You dont want young and upcoming players in the squad, is there a reason for this?
King Kyle lcfc Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 it's not very realistic is it BM it was a joke ne way Why dont you follow Micky Adams? who do you think you are the chaiman of the club have i just been sacked as a leicester city fan Your a bleeding prat
Guest Daniel Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 Indeed i am. Ive been called worse things by alot better people. Im taking it 'ne' means 'any' ?
King Kyle lcfc Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 i would reply to that tosh but as i'm no longer a leicester city fan i lack the passion to do so
Guest Daniel Posted 31 October 2004 Posted 31 October 2004 Is that why you posted and then edited what you said?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.