bigneville Posted 1 January 2007 Posted 1 January 2007 How many of those are as a sub for the last 10 minutes? There all starts....
lildave3 Posted 1 January 2007 Posted 1 January 2007 There all starts.... Fair enough then, didn't think they had played that much. But i still wouldn't mind them in my team, be it Leciester or someone like Boro.
bigneville Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 Fair enough then, didn't think they had played that much. But i still wouldn't mind them in my team, be it Leciester or someone like Boro. Neither did i until i looked. I wouldnt mind them here. Think there both good for the championship, just out of their depth for the premiership...
lcfc_jme Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 Neither did i until i looked. I wouldnt mind them here. Think there both good for the championship, just out of their depth for the premiership... Maybe so far this season they aren't playing as well as they should be. But they were awesome last term. I just think that if you can do it for one season, you can do it for any season you want to, it's just a question of applying yourself and the system suiting your style. Methinks they were doing fine until the two argies arrived... I could be wrong though
lildave3 Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 Maybe so far this season they aren't playing as well as they should be. But they were awesome last term. I just think that if you can do it for one season, you can do it for any season you want to, it's just a question of applying yourself and the system suiting your style. Methinks they were doing fine until the two argies arrived... I could be wrong though Hadn't they won 1 and lost 1? Don't hold me to it though.
RowlattsFox Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 what did zamora do last season?, harewood did well considering people thought he was crap in our league before last season. i don't remember zamora scoring many goals last season but i could be wrong.
lcfc_jme Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 Hadn't they won 1 and lost 1? Don't hold me to it though. Not gona hold you to it, I can't remember exactly how they were faring because it was too long ago And that is why I put I could be wrong at the end of my post Maybe a statto can clear it up for me
bigneville Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 Fact.. They had W1 L1 D1... Before the Argies arrived...
lcfc_jme Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 Fact.. They had W1 L1 D1... Before the Argies arrived... Mixed bag then. 4 points out of 9. How were Zamora and Harewood doing in terms of ratings/shots on target?? Or is that a bit much to ask ??
bigneville Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 Mixed bag then. 4 points out of 9. How were Zamora and Harewood doing in terms of ratings/shots on target?? Or is that a bit much to ask ?? Bit too much mate at this time of the evening. If i get a chance i'll look tomoro..
Leicester's 12th Man Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 Click this link to see how poor the Hammers were. It was like a bad dream for them, defensivley they had nothing and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th goals proved that. It just went through the defence/keeper everytime.
MC Prussian Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 Click this link to see how poor the Hammers were. It was like a bad dream for them, defensivley they had nothing and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th goals proved that. It just went through the defence/keeper everytime. All in all, an abysmal defensive display. Especially the long balls were West Ham's least favourite. From that short summary, it seems like the Hammers celebrated for too long over the New Year's break and Reading were all concentrated, focused and played wonderful combinations. Well deserved!
coale39 Posted 2 January 2007 Posted 2 January 2007 I think there going down. Before they were relegated last time, i thought they had too much quality etc but they still went down. This time i think the same thing so there pretty much DOOMED!
lookwhaticando Posted 3 January 2007 Posted 3 January 2007 I'd take Zamora or Harewood off their hands.
lildave3 Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 Shorey was on fire, at one point Reading fans were singing 'Shorey for England'
lcfc_jme Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 Shorey was on fire, at one point Reading fans were singing 'Shorey for England' I heard that I think it was before they scored their 5th and Shorey whipped in another great ball to set it up!
lildave3 Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 I heard that I think it was before they scored their 5th and Shorey whipped in another great ball to set it up! He had a hand in 4 of their goals, me thinks Thracian's a fan
lcfc_jme Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 He had a hand in 4 of their goals, me thinks Thracian's a fan I would like to think a performance such as that made many more people than Thracian (no disrespect meant) take notice of him and become a fan He's definitely worth keeping an eye on to see how he develops
lildave3 Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 How old is he? Can't see him displacing Cashley anytime soon, or Bridge for that matter.
lcfc_jme Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 How old is he? Can't see him displacing Cashley anytime soon, or Bridge for that matter. He's 26, so he isn't as young as I expected. Can't see him dislodging Cashley from the England set-up, though I wouldn't be suprised to see him remove Bridge.
lildave3 Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 He's 26, so he isn't as young as I expected. Can't see him dislodging Cashley from the England set-up, though I wouldn't be suprised to see him remove Bridge. Can't see it myself, there's always Konchesky and Baines aswell.
lcfc_jme Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 Can't see it myself, there's always Konchesky and Baines aswell. Baines is one for the future. Konchesky is playing for West Ham at the minute, so he'll be looked on less favourably than Shorey, who's playing for a team higher in the league
lildave3 Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 Baines is one for the future. Konchesky is playing for West Ham at the minute, so he'll be looked on less favourably than Shorey, who's playing for a team higher in the league I'd go for Baines becuase of his youth, he has a deadly shot on him aswell.
lcfc_jme Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 I'd go for Baines becuase of his youth, he has a deadly shot on him aswell. As I said, Baines is one for the future.. He'll develop faster as he plays for better teams when he gets older Shorey hasn't got the time on his side and would be a better bet for now methinks than Baines
lookwhaticando Posted 4 January 2007 Posted 4 January 2007 As I said, Baines is one for the future.. He'll develop faster as he plays for better teams when he gets older Shorey hasn't got the time on his side and would be a better bet for now methinks than Baines There's nobody better than Wigan. 'cept Bolton perhaps.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.