Matt Posted 13 June 2005 Posted 13 June 2005 Not Guilty on all counts! Told you...fuking liers the accusers!
Guest freund Posted 13 June 2005 Posted 13 June 2005 CONSPIRACY. PUBLICITY STUNT. HE WAS IN DEBT. THE WHOLE BASHIR AND THIS WAS A PUBLICITY STUNT FOR MONEY. I SHIT YOU NOT.
Fox Shagger Posted 14 June 2005 Posted 14 June 2005 I'm free. 123170[/snapback] loll that is some funny shit.
Guest Posted 14 June 2005 Posted 14 June 2005 One of the jurors has said he felt that Jackson was guilty, but the evidence against him was strong enough for a conviction, and if there is reasonable doubt, a verdict of 'not guilty' has to be passed. I know a lot of people think justice has prevailed, and that people feel vindicated by this result, but the bloke is not right. Any man who feels the need to invite young boys into his bed is either doing something he shouldn't, or is in dire need of help. I strongly suspect the latter. I would hope someone close enough to Jacko would sit him down and tell the bloke, but it will never happen. His 'posse' and the sycophants outside the courthouse will never admit it. I hope I don't sound too harsh, because I do feel sorry for the bloke, but I think a lot of his problems are of his own making.
Katy Posted 14 June 2005 Posted 14 June 2005 One of the jurors has said he felt that Jackson was guilty, but the evidence against him was strong enough for a conviction, and if there is reasonable doubt, a verdict of 'not guilty' has to be passed.I know a lot of people think justice has prevailed, and that people feel vindicated by this result, but the bloke is not right. Any man who feels the need to invite young boys into his bed is either doing something he shouldn't, or is in dire need of help. I strongly suspect the latter. I would hope someone close enough to Jacko would sit him down and tell the bloke, but it will never happen. His 'posse' and the sycophants outside the courthouse will never admit it. I hope I don't sound too harsh, because I do feel sorry for the bloke, but I think a lot of his problems are of his own making. 123232[/snapback] I dont think you are being harsh Lease, its something ive said all along, he needs some serious counselling. After the childhood (or lack of it) hes had its unsurprising that he feels the need to hang around with kids and buy them things to make them be his friend, im not condoning his behaviour just trying to make sense of it.
Guest Posted 14 June 2005 Posted 14 June 2005 One of the jurors has said he felt that Jackson was guilty, but the evidence against him was strong enough for a conviction, and if there is reasonable doubt, a verdict of 'not guilty' has to be passed.I know a lot of people think justice has prevailed, and that people feel vindicated by this result, but the bloke is not right. Any man who feels the need to invite young boys into his bed is either doing something he shouldn't, or is in dire need of help. I strongly suspect the latter. I would hope someone close enough to Jacko would sit him down and tell the bloke, but it will never happen. His 'posse' and the sycophants outside the courthouse will never admit it. I hope I don't sound too harsh, because I do feel sorry for the bloke, but I think a lot of his problems are of his own making. 123232[/snapback] I dont think you are being harsh Lease, its something ive said all along, he needs some serious counselling. After the childhood (or lack of it) hes had its unsurprising that he feels the need to hang around with kids and buy them things to make them be his friend, im not condoning his behaviour just trying to make sense of it. 123238[/snapback] Exacty! He's no concept of the real world, he probably doesn't think he's doing wrong. What makes it worse is his entourage - surely you'd put the money to one side and say something?
Matt Posted 14 June 2005 Posted 14 June 2005 Now all the music channels are playing MJ's music, and have got documentrys about him on htere channels, no doubt the same channels will be putting on adverts advertising these programmes saying someting like "The official Micheal Jackson supporter" e.t.c... The point i'm trying to make is as soon as he is made innocent the love MJ playing his music, e.t.c, but while the accusations were first made and while the court battles been going on where was all this support for him? Where were all these programmes being shown about him? Where was his music on the music channels? VH1 = Micheal Jackson's most shocking moments TMF = Micheal Jackson's secret childhood The Box = Who's Bad? Not Jacko ...as far as I know thats it, but no doubt in a few days time all the channel's will be jumping on the bandwagon
Guest Posted 15 June 2005 Posted 15 June 2005 Now all the music channels are playing MJ's music, and have got documentrys about him on htere channels, no doubt the same channels will be putting on adverts advertising these programmes saying someting like "The official Micheal Jackson supporter" e.t.c...The point i'm trying to make is as soon as he is made innocent the love MJ playing his music, e.t.c, but while the accusations were first made and while the court battles been going on where was all this support for him? Where were all these programmes being shown about him? Where was his music on the music channels? VH1 = Micheal Jackson's most shocking moments TMF = Micheal Jackson's secret childhood The Box = Who's Bad? Not Jacko ...as far as I know thats it, but no doubt in a few days time all the channel's will be jumping on the bandwagon 123405[/snapback] If he'd been found guilty, it would still be the same, except the programmes would be called 'The Rise and Fall of Michael Jackson' and 'Bad' or whatever. Cheap TV!
FNQ Posted 16 June 2005 Posted 16 June 2005 I feel disappointed... 123154[/snapback] You feel dissapointed that Michael Jackson is not a paedofile? You´re dissapointed that Arvizo was not sexually abused? Can´t work that one out.
Cat Burger Posted 16 June 2005 Posted 16 June 2005 I feel disappointed... 123154[/snapback] You feel dissapointed that Michael Jackson is not a paedofile? You´re dissapointed that Arvizo was not sexually abused? Can´t work that one out. 123868[/snapback] I guess I must've just wanted him to be one SOO bad. The man is mentally ill, and all that is going that happen that he gets lots and lots of publicity.
FNQ Posted 16 June 2005 Posted 16 June 2005 I feel disappointed... 123154[/snapback] You feel dissapointed that Michael Jackson is not a paedofile? You´re dissapointed that Arvizo was not sexually abused? Can´t work that one out. 123868[/snapback] I guess I must've just wanted him to be one SOO bad. The man is mentally ill, and all that is going that happen that he gets lots and lots of publicity. 123880[/snapback] Yes the man is obviously mantally Ill. I just don´t see why you wanted him to be a paedophile aswell.
Cat Burger Posted 16 June 2005 Posted 16 June 2005 I feel disappointed... 123154[/snapback] You feel dissapointed that Michael Jackson is not a paedofile? You´re dissapointed that Arvizo was not sexually abused? Can´t work that one out. 123868[/snapback] I guess I must've just wanted him to be one SOO bad. The man is mentally ill, and all that is going that happen that he gets lots and lots of publicity. 123880[/snapback] Yes the man is obviously mantally Ill. I just don´t see why you wanted him to be a paedophile aswell. 123895[/snapback] I was being sarcastic there I guess I was disappointed at the time because I wanted SOMETHING done.
FNQ Posted 16 June 2005 Posted 16 June 2005 I feel disappointed... 123154[/snapback] You feel dissapointed that Michael Jackson is not a paedofile? You´re dissapointed that Arvizo was not sexually abused? Can´t work that one out. 123868[/snapback] I guess I must've just wanted him to be one SOO bad. The man is mentally ill, and all that is going that happen that he gets lots and lots of publicity. 123880[/snapback] Yes the man is obviously mantally Ill. I just don´t see why you wanted him to be a paedophile aswell. 123895[/snapback] I was being sarcastic there I guess I was disappointed at the time because I wanted SOMETHING done. 123898[/snapback] For what? Him being ill. Have you no sympathy.
Cat Burger Posted 16 June 2005 Posted 16 June 2005 I feel disappointed... 123154[/snapback] You feel dissapointed that Michael Jackson is not a paedofile? You´re dissapointed that Arvizo was not sexually abused? Can´t work that one out. 123868[/snapback] I guess I must've just wanted him to be one SOO bad. The man is mentally ill, and all that is going that happen that he gets lots and lots of publicity. 123880[/snapback] Yes the man is obviously mantally Ill. I just don´t see why you wanted him to be a paedophile aswell. 123895[/snapback] I was being sarcastic there I guess I was disappointed at the time because I wanted SOMETHING done. 123898[/snapback] For what? Him being ill. Have you no sympathy. 123902[/snapback] Well someone has to make him get help! He's not exactly going to do it himself now is he? and it's been said before that neither will his entourage! And no I don't really have any sympathy.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.