sphericalfox Posted 11 December 2011 Posted 11 December 2011 Well here's another post/thread where I ask you to view my external bits and bobs. I promise to cough, just warm up your hands first. Fix Up-Look Sharp Of course, baiting, winding up, and ostracisation is always welcome.
sphericalfox Posted 11 December 2011 Author Posted 11 December 2011 I'm too scared to click on that link now It's ok, I've washed.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 11 December 2011 Posted 11 December 2011 It's long winded, but I do tend to agree with most of it.
sphericalfox Posted 11 December 2011 Author Posted 11 December 2011 It's long winded, but I do tend to agree with most of it. Aye, I hadn't written for a while so purged a bit.
Dan Posted 11 December 2011 Posted 11 December 2011 I thought this was going to be about how we should sign Billy Sharp.
Guest Col city fan Posted 11 December 2011 Posted 11 December 2011 I thought this was going to be about how we should sign Billy Sharp. Same here.. Shame
sphericalfox Posted 11 December 2011 Author Posted 11 December 2011 I thought this was going to be about how we should sign Billy Sharp. Shit, missed a trick there then!
sphericalfox Posted 17 December 2011 Author Posted 17 December 2011 I don't to say I tol.....Oh nevermind
phildw Posted 17 December 2011 Posted 17 December 2011 I stopped reading when you said Pearson has had a good start 'points wise'. 1 from the last 9 wtf!!
sphericalfox Posted 17 December 2011 Author Posted 17 December 2011 I stopped reading when you said Pearson has had a good start 'points wise'. 1 from the last 9 wtf!! I was referring to the first 4 games not the collective total. You may want to read it again. If you're not in mood I wouldn't blame you.
I am Rod Hull Posted 17 December 2011 Posted 17 December 2011 I stopped reading when you said Pearson has had a good start 'points wise'. 1 from the last 9 wtf!! But his first 3 games wielded 7 from 9.... So he did have a good start wtf....
sphericalfox Posted 17 December 2011 Author Posted 17 December 2011 But his first 3 games wielded 7 from 9.... So he did have a good start wtf.... If philwd cared to read the next paragraph he would have seen where I was heading, and the reason why I think we had a good start under Pearson. Today's and last week's performances compound a team who have nothing to prove to a manager who is happy to put them in the first team squad, cos he knows them implicitly. Some might argue that player power got him the position again, and he's paying them back. That would be pretty cynical, but if that was anywhere near the truth, then we have a very long slog ahead of us, full of disappointments.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.