Blue Arrow Posted 3 July 2005 Posted 3 July 2005 im gutted he was ok he tryed and was exciting at times but the boo boys were after him so i hope they are happy, who they gonna boo this season? im sure they will save there voices for devries, check the pattern akinbiyi, benjamin, jordan devries......hmmm! i would have him instead of tiatto anyday 131058[/snapback] You'd have an arrogant chav who plays when it suits him over someone whos committed and has drive and a will to win? Maybe the boo boys have done us a favour, Adams has gone, a newer, cleverer man has taken the reins. Stewarts gone De Vries is working his arse off in training 131244[/snapback] Yes but he signed him in the first place.
TrickyTrev Posted 3 July 2005 Posted 3 July 2005 He is not going to improve much more now he is 23, so it was about time one of our manmagers made a decsion with him. Is he good enough to play for Leicester ro could we get ina better player for the same money? Personally I think 125k is a lot in the current transfer climate, especially for a full back and I am sure there are better players out there witing to be snapped up. People complaints seem to be based on unrealistic expextations of transfer fees. He is an unwanted full back in a heavily deflated transfer market. 125k is a god fee in my opinion. I also suspect there is a certain loyalty because he sort of came through the youth system, which is ridiculous because we only picked up from Villa when he was 16 and youth players shoudl only get to play if they are good enough. Well done CL for making a decison one way or aother, if you sign a quality replacement then it will have been very good business.
Hitesh Posted 3 July 2005 Posted 3 July 2005 Ok, so i got got back on satuday mornin really pissed, read bout this then pissed myslef with laughter (not litteraly but it was close!). Dont know why i was laughing but i guess it was the drink! Anyway this was a bit of a shock but the money will hopefully help. I just hope the money is speant wisely!
Ric Flair Posted 4 July 2005 Posted 4 July 2005 Not sure about this. Jordan has been so frustrating over the past 3 years, atleast we won't have that to deal with anymore. I just hope Levein brings in a good left back with age on his side because although Stewart was inconsistent I think defensively he was quite solid. Levein has talked at length about the importance of having young and homegrown players in our team, yet he gets rid of two in Stewart and Heath who are our longest serving players. He's a brave man, because although I agree both of them ultimately aren't good enough for the premiership we need a settled side to build up continuity and taking those two out is contradicting alot of things that he has said. Pleased about that Blackburn chap arriving, he's impressed me when i've seen him.
NoStewartfan Posted 4 July 2005 Posted 4 July 2005 I am glad Mr 'Flatter to decive I am as good as a choclate fire guard' has gone 85 south, be it near me. He was our most over rated player with no end product.
Alexikokopops Posted 4 July 2005 Posted 4 July 2005 Just realised this is why Watford let Paul Mayo head back to Lincoln only 16 months after they signed him from Lincoln.
Frenzied Posted 5 July 2005 Posted 5 July 2005 Getting rid of Stewart is great news - Levein once again shows an astuteness that was distinctly lacking in his predecessor.
kirkwoodifa Posted 5 July 2005 Posted 5 July 2005 Jordan Stewart: For - Age Against - Can't cross a football, therefore no good on the wing going forward. Not solid enough to be a reliable defender. Never a central midfield player therefore simply not good enough, especially in the prem where we want to be. If he was any good, bearing in mind his age is right, why wern't the big boys of this world not scrambling for his signature? I think I know the answer. Watford for a season or two then the pontins league.
.png.0e7438f54a80a2f2566907f77fd7a32a.thumb.png.0ea5e31693d284629c473304eabd4568.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.