Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
lush

Political correctness is not the answer

Recommended Posts

Posted

Iain MacWhirter says it’s time to put away our liberal politeness and tackle head on the problem of Islamofascism brewing in Asian communities

I was phoned by a contact of mine last week. Won’t mention his name. He’s the director of a pressure group, prominent in the media, well-connected and desperately scared – and I really mean scared – that racial war is breaking out in Britain.

But wait: he wasn’t talking about white racism; he was talking about Asian racism, British Asian racism, which he believes is the greater threat. Hatred of white people (and black people) is, he insisted, rampant among Britain’s Asian community and Islamofascism poses a serious and imminent threat to public order.

But the women sound almost as bad. Shazia describes a visit to a Muslim swimming club in Birmingham where the women were dressed in black caps, black leggings, and black costumes – in the water. She turned out in a leopard-skin leotard and was barred for being dressed immorally. “Go and swim with the white women if you want to look like that,†she was told.

Hanif Kureshi, the writer, took up this theme last week. He said British-born children of Asian immigrants are becoming seduced by a religious separatism that is intolerant of whites.

hat Mirza, Kureshi and others, like Trevor Phillips of the Commission for Racial Equality, depict is a massive failure of integration.

Posted

Adolf Hitler made speeches abouit the Jews along these lines to recruit his supporters.

I hope nobody falls into the same trap that his followers did after reading this post.

Posted
Adolf Hitler made speeches abouit the Jews along these lines to recruit his supporters.

I hope nobody falls into the same trap that his followers did after reading this post.

151847[/snapback]

Get off your moral high horse, this is obviously a problem stop side stepping it.

He's not saying he wants to slit their throats or anything.

Posted
Get off your moral high horse, this is obviously a problem stop side stepping it.

He's not saying he wants to slit their throats or anything.

151858[/snapback]

Germany did not one morning wake-up and decide to slaughter 6 million Jews, Communists, Gypsies, etc. A clever group of people seized upon an ideology and ruthlessly exploited it. Even the most civilised nation in the world (Germany possessed the best scientists, engineers at that time, we were not talking semi-educated fools) was seduced through a series of clever believable notions (that in actual fact were absurdities, but appeared plausible).

There may well be a problem between certain groups, however it is not an issue of race or religion. It is an issue of an ideology rooted in religious beliefs.

There is a marked difference between Islam and Islamism. Islam is a religion. Islamism is a religious-political ideology, which is fascist in its nature. Thus a racial war is not breaking out, and Lush's post is in fact a misnomer. It is a battle of ideas. The biggest victims of islamism have been and continue to be muslims (e.g. in Iraq today - Who is harmed when "insurgents" bomb power stations, sewage stations, civil amenities, etc?).

Posted
Thus a racial war is not breaking out, and Lush's post is in fact a misnomer.

151879[/snapback]

Explain my debate on racial war in this thread?

Posted
Explain my debate on racial war in this thread?

151892[/snapback]

Sorry, I should clarify. Lush's contact and director of a pressure group (I would be interested to know the pressure group) has misunderstood the situation. However, posting of this fallacy provides a platform and tacit approval for this falsehood.

Posted
Sorry, I should clarify.  Lush's contact and director of a pressure group (I would be interested to know the pressure group) has misunderstood the situation.  However, posting of this fallacy provides a platform and tacit approval for this falsehood.

151896[/snapback]

What on earth are you smoking? :ermm:

What has any of the article got to do with a racial war?

Posted
Iain MacWhirter says it’s time to put away our liberal politeness and tackle head on the problem of Islamofascism brewing in Asian communities

I was phoned by a contact of mine last week. Won’t mention his name. He’s the director of a pressure group, prominent in the media, well-connected and desperately scared – and I really mean scared – that racial war is breaking out in Britain.

But wait: he wasn’t talking about white racism; he was talking about Asian racism, British Asian racism, which he believes is the greater threat. Hatred of white people (and black people) is, he insisted, rampant among Britain’s Asian community and Islamofascism poses a serious and imminent threat to public order.

But the women sound almost as bad. Shazia describes a visit to a Muslim swimming club in Birmingham where the women were dressed in black caps, black leggings, and black costumes – in the water. She turned out in a leopard-skin leotard and was barred for being dressed immorally. “Go and swim with the white women if you want to look like that,†she was told.

Hanif Kureshi, the writer, took up this theme last week. He said British-born children of Asian immigrants are becoming seduced by a religious separatism that is intolerant of whites.

hat Mirza, Kureshi and others, like Trevor Phillips of the Commission for Racial Equality, depict is a massive failure of integration.

151769[/snapback]

Forgive me for being so naive as to misunderstand a post that begins with an implication of a race war, before going on to talk about the racism within our society with its threat to you and I. Of all the ways to approach a highly sensitive topic such as this, you choose a writing style which plants an idea of a potential racial war, where we (I am assuming you are white) are the victims. How do you end a post like this? You leave nothing, no further analysis or exploration. It is irresponsible, for it is based on a misunderstanding of the situation today which is about political-facist ideologies (and not race or religion)

I am still intrigued as to who this pressure group is of your contact (I appreciate you can't name your contact).

Posted
Forgive me for being so naive as to misunderstand a post that begins with an implication of a race war, before going on to talk about the racism within our society with its threat to you and I. 

Of all the ways to approach a highly sensitive topic such as this, you choose a writing style which plants an idea of a potential racial war, where we (I am assuming you are white) are the victims

How do you end a post like this? You leave nothing, no further analysis or exploration.  It is irresponsible , for it is based on a misunderstanding of the situation today which is about political-facist ideologies (and not race or religion)

I am still intrigued as to who this pressure group is of your contact (I appreciate you can't name your contact).

151916[/snapback]

So you were paying attention, thats what i like to see :ermm:

White people are victims of racism. i dont care whether its sensitive or not, its the truth and this is a discussion forum, to discuss things like this, untill the producers say otherwise.

Was it irresponsible of our `news` organisations to tell us about stephen lawrence`s murder, but not gavin hopley? or to the extent, kriss donald?

Was it also irreseponsible for our news broadcasters to tell us about the then leeds utd players `racist` actions, but not tell us about the arsenal football (marcus artry) who raped a 14 year old white girl and got a NINE year jail sentence last november?

I give some of the genral public an insight into anti-white racism, and what it means in our society, and im bad compared to our news broadcasters???

I should be praised for leveling up the truth, which is why i got you to extend your stance with the `racial war` thing. ;)

If i had said all this at the time of thread production, many in here would call me `racist`. So i thought i`d just produce the publication, and see what happens, thanks.

I have no connection with this pressure group you mention.

Posted
So you were paying attention, thats what i like to see :ermm:

White people are victims of racism. i dont care whether its sensitive or not, its the truth and this is a discussion forum, to discuss things like this, untill the producers say otherwise.

Was it irresponsible of our `news` organisations to tell us about stephen lawrence`s murder, but not gavin hopley? or to the extent, kriss donald?

Was it also irreseponsible for our news broadcasters to tell us about the then leeds utd players `racist` actions, but not tell us about the arsenal football (marcus artry) who raped a 14 year old white girl and got a NINE year jail sentence last november?

I give some of the genral public an insight into anti-white racism, and what it means in our society, and im bad compared to our news broadcasters???

I should be praised for leveling up the truth, which is why i got you to extend your stance with the `racial war` thing. ;)

If i had said all this at the time of thread production, many in here would call me `racist`. So i thought i`d just produce the publication, and see what happens, thanks.

I have no connection with this pressure group you mention.

151954[/snapback]

Lush, I don't feel that you can portray yourself as some kind of moral crusader. True, a discussion forum is a place "to discuss things like this", however the most important and often forgotten aspect of free speech is the responsibility that comes with it.

Your posting on this topic is irresponsible and I do not "praise" you for it. To start a topic by planting an idea of a racial war is grossly irresponsible.

In answer to your questions:

Was it also irreseponsible for our news broadcasters to tell us about the then leeds utd players `racist` actions, but not tell us about the arsenal football (marcus artry) who raped a 14 year old white girl and got a NINE year jail sentence last november?

The Leeds players were (and are still in some quarters) role models who committed a violent act. So no, it is not irresponsible for the media to report this.

With regards Marcus Artry, I am suprised you pick this out as a cause for concern and fail to see your connection of this to racism. This nobody raped a 14 year old girl and was prosecuted. I am assuming Artry is black. Is that your only grounds for racial concern? I am a little troubled that you choose this to be a race incident.

With regards Stephen Lawrence, the police made mistakes and they were right to be publicised. However, both Hopley's and Lawrence's murders were printed by our media. The reason for the extra media attention of the Lawrence murder as oppose to the Hopley murder were the fact that arrests were made within 10 days for Hopley whilst a trial was held, with the jury reaching a recorded verdict. This did not occur for the murderers of Stephen Lawrence, until the media got involved.

Eitherway, your posting style is irresponsible and can not be construed as providing a balanced insight into a highly sensitive topic.

And I am still intrigued as to why you persistently refuse to answer my question as to which pressure group your contact is from (note: the one you mention in your first post, not me).

Posted

He doesn't know.

He's just reprinted an article which happens to fit his own narrow-minded xenophobic prejudice.

It's about time we tackled his bigotry head-on. Otherwise this website will be heading for the gutter!

Posted
Lush, I don't feel that you can portray yourself as some kind of moral crusader.

Why? Isnt it all our duty to tell the truth?

Your posting on this topic is irresponsible and I do not "praise" you for it.  To start a topic by planting an idea of a racial war is grossly irresponsible.

So your going to send a strongly worded letter to the writer then? because he gets paid to produce a `professional` article, and its law abidding.

If he gets the sack for it, i`ll appologise, ok.

With regards Marcus Artry, I am suprised you pick this out as a cause for concern and fail to see your connection of this to racism.  This nobody raped a 14 year old girl and was prosecuted.  I am assuming Artry is black.  Is that your only grounds for concern?  I am a little troubled that you choose this to be a race incident.

Dont you think its news worthy? i do, so why wasnt there level broadcasting?

I wrote to sky news, and asked them why they didnt tell us about it. They said prince charles stating he was not gay, was more news worthy. Fine i thought. I wrote back and asked them why they couldnt spare 10 seconds for it, they didnt respond.

This story was racial, aswell as sexual. It had all the hallmarks of `breaking news` flash, but the appressor was black, and the victim was white.

Had it been the opposite....

If your going to tell me that this wasnt news worthy, you need mental help.

With regards Stephen Lawrence, the police made mistakes and they were right to be publicised.  However, both Hopley's and Lawrence's murders were printed  by our media.  The reason for the extra media attention of the Lawrence murder as oppose to the Hopley murder were the fact that arrests were made within 10 days for Hopley whilst a trial was held, with the jury reaching a recorder verdict. This did not occur for the murderers of Stephen Lawrence, until the media got involved.

Printed in a local paper, and not by national coverage, both print and visual. Your diverting the truth from people who will read this. You are as bad as the media.

I seriously beg to differ about the hopley arrests coming so soon. it is my understanding that it took about 1 year for the police forces to even consider catching his asian murderers.

The media are in conjunction with our liberal and political masters. The stephen lawrence murder was deliberately staged over a period of time.

Your a fool if you think the media do things because they naturally happen.

And I am still intrigued as to why you persistently refuse to answer my question as to which pressure group your contact is from (note: the one you mention in your first post, not me).

The COMPLETE thread headline is the link story, ive not added anything to it.

Now STOP trying to make me out to be some sort of frenzied activist that society should stop. be sensible, or dont talk to me, this is a ```sensative``` subject, remember ;)

151997[/snapback]

Posted
He doesn't know. 

He's just reprinted an article which happens to fit his own narrow-minded xenophobic prejudice.

It's about time we tackled his bigotry head-on.  Otherwise this website will be heading for the gutter!

152015[/snapback]

And what about your narrow-minded prejudice ;)

I say we stop you abusing people for your own needs, how about that.

Posted

With regards Artry, I find your continuing racial link troubling. A rapist is an oppressor by definition, so it matters not if he is black, white, yellow. Had it been a white man raping a black girl, it would still be rape. Why does it make it anymore newsworthy? It doesn't, and you will see that if you watch the news. Furthermore your continuing pushing of this black man as oppressor seems to hint that a black man raping a white girl is more outrageous than a black man raping a black girl.

With regards, Hopley it is my understanding that an Asian family took the injured Hopley into their home to care for him until an ambulance arrived. By the way you are wrong about national coverage. This story was run both print and visual. Check your facts, it didn't take a year for the police "to consider catching his asian murderers", it took a week.

Once again, your continuing presentation of a whole host of topics is vitriolic and subjective based on half-truths and unknowns.

Posted
With regards Artry, I find your continuing racial link troubling.  A rapist is an oppressor by definition, so it matters not if he is black, white, yellow.  Had it been a white man raping a black girl, it would still be rape. 

Why does it make it anymore newsworthy? 

It doesn't, and you will see that if you watch the news.

Furthermore your continuing pushing of this black man as oppressor seems to hint that a black man raping a white girl is more outrageous than a black man raping a black girl.

With regards, Hopley it is my understanding that an Asian family took the injured Hopley into their home to care for him until an ambulance arrived. 

By the way you are wrong about national coverage.  This story was run both print and visual. 

Check your facts, it didn't take a year for the police "to consider catching his asian murderers", it took a week.

Once again, your continuing presentation of a whole host of topics is vitriolic and subjective based on half-truths and unknowns.

152052[/snapback]

The white girl in question told how he verbally, racially and sexually abused her.

oh come on mate, an arsenal youth player, who racially and sexually abuses a FOURTEEN year old GIRL, and it was SO bad he got NINE years, and its not news worthy? :S

Are you a failed comedian or something.

The `news` is about making money, its NOT about morality in terms of NEWS.

Furthermore....your assuming im saying that. talk about reality mate, not fantasy.

yes i read about the family who took him in. what has that to do with any of this?

What visual was this murder produced on?

At what date (approximately) did the murderers get convicted?

I dont get your last point, care to explain yourself? `topic(s)`?

Posted
The white girl in question told how he verbally, racially and sexually abused her.

oh come on mate, an arsenal youth player, who racially and sexually abuses a FOURTEEN year old GIRL, and it was SO bad he got NINE years, and its not news worthy? :S

Are you a failed comedian or something.

The `news` is about making money, its NOT about morality in terms of NEWS.

Furthermore....your assuming im saying that. talk about reality mate, not fantasy.

yes i read about the family who took him in. what has that to do with any of this?

What visual was this murder produced on?

At what date (approximately) did the murderers get convicted?

I dont get your last point, care to explain yourself? `topic(s)`?

152068[/snapback]

Artry may well have shouted abuse at this girl whilst raping her, some even racial, but once again, his attack was not motivated by racial prejudice. Rape is heinous crime, motivated by power. Artry is sick, yes, but this has nothing to do with race. It is troubling that you refuse to acknowledge this and is indicative of your flawed logic and reasoning.

With regards Hopley, it is important to mention an Asian family attempted to help so that political activists with their own agenda are unable to whip up hysteria about this crime. Indeed, Hopley's own family refuse to release photos of their loved one for fear of the BNP using him as a white martyr (which has happened in Oldham).

The suspects of Hopley's murder were not convicted. They were tried in a court of law and found not guilty. The suspects for Lawrence's murder equally were acquitted as well. On all counts, more evidence was needed. The media is one thing, but the legal system in this country deliberately attempts to puts itself above all hysteria so that a free trial can be heard, away from prejudice and bigotry.

The only point I agree on with you is that of the media. The media is a business. A journalist once told me the phrase, "News is not there to educate, it is there to encapture." So yes, news is a TV programme, up against other news programmes in the ratings. Thus a human interest story or sensationalist story will always take precedence. However, your attempts at "levelling up the truth" are appalling and do anything but. Instead, you become everything you despise about the news organisation in this country. I would be interested to know which news organisation you consider to give the most balanced coverage.

With regards my last point of your irresponsible nature of posting mirrored with its half-truths and unknowns, I think you know full well.

In one of your earlier posts, you asked me to stop trying to paint you as some sort of frenzied activist. I think you are doing a good job of that yourself.

Posted
With regards Artry, I find your continuing racial link troubling.  A rapist is an oppressor by definition, so it matters not if he is black, white, yellow.  Had it been a white man raping a black girl, it would still be rape.  Why does it make it anymore newsworthy?  It doesn't, and you will see that if you watch the news. Furthermore your continuing pushing of this black man as oppressor seems to hint that a black man raping a white girl is more outrageous than a black man raping a black girl.

With regards, Hopley it is my understanding that an Asian family took the injured Hopley into their home to care for him until an ambulance arrived.  By the way you are wrong about national coverage.  This story was run both print and visual.  Check your facts, it didn't take a year for the police "to consider catching his asian murderers", it took a week.

Once again, your continuing presentation of a whole host of topics is vitriolic and subjective based on half-truths and unknowns.

152052[/snapback]

And are you prepared to face the real truth?

I don't know the answers to the questions I'm going to pose because the authorities (doubtless) believe they would be inflamatory.

But it would be interesting and would certainly give some basis to debate to know the following statistics (in the UK/in Europe):

The number of Muslim rapes of white women against the number of Muslim rapes of Muslim Women.

The number of black rapes of white women as against the number of black rapes of black women.

The number of rapes by non whites as an overall proportion of all rapes.

The number of white rapes as an overall proportionm.

The number of whites raping blacks.

The number of Christians raping anyone.

Does anyone dare reveal these facts?

Posted
And are you prepared to face the real truth?

I don't know the answers to the questions I'm going to pose because the authorities (doubtless) believe they would be inflamatory.

But it would be interesting and would certainly give some basis to debate to know the following statistics (in the UK/in Europe):

The number of Muslim rapes of white women against the number of Muslim rapes of Muslim Women.

The number of black rapes of white women as against the number of black rapes of black women.

The number of rapes by non whites as an overall proportion of all rapes.

The number of white rapes as an overall proportionm.

The number of whites raping blacks.

The number of Christians raping anyone.

Does anyone dare reveal these facts?

152227[/snapback]

For whatever reason, these statistics are either not recorded or not available. Consquently (and this is one of the arguments I must keep providing), we can not make an argument or reasoned point based on assumptions of unknown statistics.

As we all know, statistics show a trend without explaining the reasoning for such a trend. So to quote statistics without exploration of the data is again misleading.

For example, taking this absurd rape example further, a trend may or may not identify more rapes of non-whites on white women than non-whites on non-whites. To explain this as a racial divide or racial incident is again a failure to investigate the reasons behind this. For example, it may be that there are more white women in vulnerable situations (e.g. walking home drunk alone after a night out) than non-white.

The point I am making is that aspersions are being cast based on unknowns or half-truths, which is irresponsible.

In answer to your question, "Am I ready to face the truth?". Yes, I am, gladly, however, I have not yet been confronted by it from the evidence that has been presented in these posts.

Posted
Artry may well have shouted abuse at this girl whilst raping her, some even racial , but once again, his attack was not motivated by racial prejudice .  Rape is heinous crime, motivated by power.  Artry is sick, yes, but this has nothing to do with race .  It is troubling that you refuse to acknowledge this and is indicative of your flawed logic and reasoning.

With regards Hopley, it is important to mention an Asian family attempted to help so that political activists with their own agenda are unable to whip up hysteria about this crime .  Indeed, Hopley's own family refuse to release photos of their loved one for fear of the BNP using him as a white martyr (which has happened in Oldham).

However, your attempts at "levelling up the truth" are appalling and do anything but.

I would be interested to know which news organisation you consider to give the most balanced coverage.

In one of your earlier posts, you asked me to stop trying to paint you as some sort of frenzied activist.  I think you are doing a good job of that yourself.

152186[/snapback]

You contradict yourself, it is troubling that you fail miserably to ackowledge this. The actual rape was not racial (as far as we know), but he did commit racism towards that girl. The term `Occams razor` springs to mind here. You`d do well to understand that.

WHAT HAS THE ASIAN FAMILY, GOT TO DO WITH HOPLEY`S MURDER??? They had nothing to do with it. Why are you blaming someone else (political activists) and not his murderers? Are you defending the asian racist murderers, by attacking `political activists (who are white people)? because thats what it seems to me.

Leveling up. IF the media told the 40 odd million white community the TRUTH about their racial discriminatory society, what do you think they would think of all the anti-white murders, why exactly the riots in oldham started, the organisations that represent non whites, and that whites dont get the same fair treatment i.e the black and asian police association (BAPA), do you think the white community would be at all happy? I`d like to wager a bet that says the WC (white community) would be seriously pissed off.

Now tell me, do you think its good business for money making organisations to `upset` their main customers?

If the WC new the truth about racial discrimination against them, there would be uproar.

I expect your respone to that would be, but thats not good for society, uproar, no i totally agree, but the truth is, and the media dont tell it.

So, im levelling it up, because the truth MEANS something to me, and the WC have been lied to for far too long.

Most balanced view....i would say sky news, but even they are anti-truth.

Of course im a activist, so are you, but im not the frenzied anti-good activist your trying to imply i am. You attack me, but i dont call you bad, i`ll leave that to the others to make their own informed view.

Posted

Lush, I can't believe you've not been banned, and can only assume that you are using free speech as a justification for your inane bumblings.

I'm not going to argue any points because Bread & Cheese has tried and you aren't willing to see anything from another viewpoint (ironically if you think about it).

Posted

Just a point on your last post - try FOX News - they might be more to your liking.

And finally - as I always say, 5% of every race, religion, colour, creed, nationality etc etc are worthless scum. You can't portray the Islamic extremists/Muslims to be any worse than Christian extremists in America (KKK) and even George Bush and Tony Blair in my opinion use their devout religion as justification for invasions to a lesser or greater degree.

Fortunately this is a minority and we should condemn the racist bigots of every race/religion as one not as individual concerns to suit individual parties.

Incidentally, you appear to be the acting in the latter manner.

Posted
Just a point on your last post -  try FOX News - they might be more to your liking.

Fortunately this is a minority and we should condemn the racist bigots of every race/religion as one not as individual concerns to suit individual parties.

Incidentally, you appear to be the acting in the latter manner.

152311[/snapback]

I dont watch the `news`, well much anyway. I have veiwed fox news, and there boring.

SECONDED on your 2nd point.

I dont get your last point?

Posted

You don't seem to be of the belief that you shouldn't use individual cases of racism to promote your own ideology.

Posted
You don't seem to be of the belief that you shouldn't use individual cases of racism to promote your own ideology.

152328[/snapback]

What is my ideology?

Are you using my posts to promote your ideology?

Posted
You contradict yourself, it is troubling that you fail miserably to ackowledge this.  The actual rape was not racial (as far as we know), but he did commit racism towards that girl. The term `Occams razor` springs to mind here. You`d do well to understand that.

WHAT HAS THE ASIAN FAMILY, GOT TO DO WITH HOPLEY`S MURDER??? They had nothing to do with it. Why are you blaming someone else (political activists) and not his murderers? Are you defending the asian racist murderers, by attacking `political activists (who are white people)? because thats what it seems to me.

Leveling up. IF the media told the 40 odd million white community the TRUTH about their racial discriminatory society, what do you think they would think of all the anti-white murders, why exactly the riots in oldham started, the organisations that represent non whites, and that whites dont get the same fair treatment i.e the black and asian police association (BAPA), do you think the white community would be at all happy? I`d like to wager a bet that says the WC (white community) would be seriously pissed off.

Now tell me, do you think its good business for money making organisations to `upset` their main customers?

If the WC new the truth about racial discrimination against them, there would be uproar.

I expect your respone to that would be, but thats not good for society, uproar, no i totally agree, but the truth is, and the media dont tell it.

So, im levelling it up, because the truth MEANS something to me, and the WC have been lied to for far too long.

Most balanced view....i would say sky news, but even they are anti-truth.

Of course im a activist, so are you, but im not the frenzied anti-good activist your trying to imply i am. You attack me, but i dont call you bad, i`ll leave that to the others to make their own informed view.

152283[/snapback]

The actual rape was not motivated by racial prejudice, which is what you have continuously implied from the start. I am pleased that your stance is now beginning to soften in that you appreciate you cannot assert that this rape was racially motivated (although you still hint at such). Unfortunately, we do not know the mindset of this despicable man, but I suspect that it could have been any vulnerable girl that night (black, white or yellow). I am still deeply troubled that you would even consider linking this case as a racial crime in the first place.

With regards Hopley, do not deliberately misconstrue the point. My mentioning of the Asian family is precisely to stop groups such as the BNP from whipping up hysteria. That is not in anyway a defence of the action of his murderers. Your intellect is higher than that. His murderers should be brought to justice for their crime and in no way am I defending their actions.

As for your holier than thou crusader of justice in society point, here is the reality of society's responsibilities. The strong and more powerful elements have a duty to protect the weaker elements of society. History is littered with examples where the powerful and more numerous elements have abused their position. So here is the truth. The 40-odd million strong white community is the majority of the country.

Again (this is a recurring point), you cast an aspersion as to what the truth is based on nothing but a few editorials and commentaries (again, not based in fact).

Your posts and your "I am merely the messenger" style are irresponsible, precisely because they do not try to tackle or eradicate the discrimination you are so against. There is no ideas vs. ideas. Your posts are one-sided examples that merely seek to stir-up divides. If anything, they could be construed as inflammatory, stirring-up divides. As you yourself admit describing how there would be uproar, "If the WC new the truth about racial discrimination against them, there would be uproar", which you agree would be bad for society but are quite happy to stir up. At least, you are aware that if people believed your posts of half-truths and falsities, you would be encouraging racial tension rather than remidying it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...